Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-22

  Turner, John C ^a,b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11944266976     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.244     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Causes and consequences of delegitimization: Models of conflict and ethnocentrism, Journal of Social Issues, 46, 65-81.
2. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed., pp. 225-273). NY: The Free Press.
3. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
4. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. NY: Academic Press.
5. Cohen, E. A. (2003). Supreme command: Soldiers, statesmen and leadership in wartime. London: Simon & Schuster.
6. Craig, G. A. (1968). The politics of the Prussian Army 1640-1945. London: Oxford University Press.
7. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the outgroup an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
8. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The ingroup minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 115-134.
9. Dépret, E. (1995). Vicarious feelings of personal control and the social categorization of powerful others. Unpublished paper. University of Grenoble.
10. Dépret, E., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 461-480.
11. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
12. Ellemers, N., van Rijswik, W., Bruins, J., & de Gilder, D. (1998). Group commitment as a moderator of attributional and behavioural responses to power use. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 555-573.
13. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
14. Festinger, L. (1953). An analysis of compliant behaviour. In M. Sherif, & M. O. Wilson (Eds.), Group relations at the crossroads (pp. 232-256). NY: Harper & Bros.
15. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
16. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
17. Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 31-61.
18. Fraser, A. (1997). Cromwell: Our chief of men. London: Arrow Books.
19. French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Social Research.
20. French, J. R. P., Morrison, H. W., & Levinger, G. (1960). Coercive power and forces affecting conformity. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 61, 93-101.
21. Goldhagen, D. J. (1997). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. London: Abacus.
22. Hanson, V. D. (2001). Why the West has won: Carnage and culture from Salamis to Vietnam. London: Faber & Faber.
23. Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
24. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 203-239.
25. Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy. NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.
27. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
28. Kershaw, I. (2000). Hitler 1936-45: Nemesis. London: Penguin.
29. Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 24, 33-41.
30. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
31. Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The use and abuse of power. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
32. Lee-Chai, A. Y., Chen, S., & Chartrand, T. L. (2001). From Moses to Marcos: Individual differences in the use and abuse of power. In A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power (pp. 57-74). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
33. Leet-Pellegrini, H., & Rubin, J. Z. (1974). The effects of six bases of power upon compliance, identification, and internalization. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 68-70.
34. McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., David, B., & Wetherell, M. S. (1990). Group polarization as conformity to the prototypical group member. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 1-20.
35. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
36. Moscovici, S. (1980). Towards a theory of conversion behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). NY: Academic Press.
37. Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 549-565.
38. Pfeffer, J. (1977). Power and resource allocation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behaviour (pp. 235-265). Chicago, 111: St. Clair Press.
39. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
40. Raven, B. H. (2001). Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: Experimental investigations and case studies. In A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power (pp. 217-240). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
41. Raven, B. H., & French, J. R. P. (1958). Legitimate power, coercive power, and observability in social influence. Sociometry, 21, 83-97.
42. Reicher, S. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell, Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford: Blackwell.
43. Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny. University of St. Andrews. In submission.
44. Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (1996a). Constructing categories and mobilising masses: An Analysis of Thatcher's and Kinnock's speeches on the British miner's strike 1984-5. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 353-371.
45. Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (1996b). Seeking influence through characterising self-categories: An analysis of antiabortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 297-312.
46. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994a). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-163.
47. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994b). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511-524.
48. Reynolds, K. J., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., Nolan, M., & Dolnik, L. (2000). Responses to powerlessness: Stereotyping as an instrument of social conflict. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 275-290.
49. Rind, B., & Kipnis, D. (1999). Changes in self-perceptions as a result of successfully persuading others. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 141-156.
50. Roberts, A. (2003). Hitler and Churchill: Secrets of leadership. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
51. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415-434.
52. Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 623-645.
53. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
55. Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. Jost, & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 332-362). NY: Cambridge University Press.
56. Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2004). The importance of social structure and social interaction in stereotype consensus and content: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 11-23.
57. Stott, C., & Reicher, S. D. (1998). Crowd action as intergroup process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 509-530.
58. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). Moral solidarity, identification with the community, and the importance of procedural justice: The police as prototypical representatives of a group's moral values. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 153-165.
59. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.
60. Taylor, N. (2000). When disagreement strikes: Incorporating compliance, conversion, resistance and reactance into a model of social response. PhD thesis. Australian National University.
61. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77-122.
62. Turner, J. C. (1987). The analysis of social influence. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 68-88). Oxford: Blackwell.
63. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
64. Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
65. Turner, J. C., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Social identity, interdependence and the social group. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 25-63). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
66. Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 25-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. (1999). Social identity, personality and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 11-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
69. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. A. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
70. Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., Haslam, S. A., & Veenstra, K. (in press). Reconceptualizing personality: Producing individuality by defining the personal self. In T. Postmes, & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. London: Sage.
71. Tyler, T. R. (2001). Social justice. In R. Brown, & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (Vol. 4, pp. 344-364). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
72. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
73. Veenstra, K., Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., Haslam, S. A., & Burgess, N. M. (2004). Power and social identity: The differential effects of ingroup and outgroup leadership on power and compliance. Australian National University. In submission.
74. Weber, U., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2002). Perceived legitimacy of intergroup status differences: Its prediction by relative ingroup prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 449-470.