Social psychology of justice: Origins, central issues, recent developments, and future directions

Nordic Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 209-234

  Kazemi, Ali ^a   TÖrnblom, Kjell ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56149103860     PISSN: 19012276     EISSN: 19040016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1901-2276.60.3.209     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (red), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
3. Ambrose, M.L. & Arnaud, A. (2005). Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 85-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Anderson, B., & Cohen, B.P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 119-46). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
5. Bies, R.J., & Moag, J.S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6. Blumstein, P. & Weinstein, E. (1969). The redress of distributive injustice. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 408-418.
7. Brickman, P. (1977). Crime and punishment in sports and society. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 140-164.
8. Brockner, J. & Wiesenfeld, B. (1996). The interactive impact of procedural and distributive justice: The effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
9. Cohen-Charash Y., & Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
10. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H., & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
11. Colquitt, J.A., Greenberg, J. & Scott, B.A. (2005). Organizational justice: Where do we stand? In J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 589-619). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Cook, K. S. & Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 217-41.
13. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z.S., Bobocel, D.R., & Rupp, D.E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-209.
14. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113. Dawes, R.M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
15. Dawes, R.M., & Thaler, R.H. (1988). Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 187-197.
16. De Cremer, D. & van den Bos, K. (2007). Justice and Feelings: Toward a new era in justice research. Social Justice Research, 20, 1-9.
17. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
18. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Eckhoff, T. (1974). Justice: Its determinants in social interaction. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
20. Eek, D., & Biel, A. (2003). The interplay between greed, efficiency, and fairness in public-goods dilemmas. Social Justice Research, 16, 195-215.
21. Foa, U.G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 71, 345-351.
22. Foa, E.B., & Foa, U.G. (1976). Resource theory of social exchange. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R.C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 99-131). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
23. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Beirhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). New York: Plenum Press.
24. Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation (pp. 183-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1-55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Gamliel, E. & Peer, E. (2006). Positive versus negative framing affects justice judgments. Social Justice Research, 19, 307-322.
27. Goode, W.J. (1978). The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a control system. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28. Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
29. Greenberg, J. (1981). The justice of distributing scarce and abundant resources. In M.J. Lerner and S.C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 289-316). New York: Plenum Press.
30. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
31. Greenberg, J. (2001). Studying organizational justice cross-culturally: Fundamental challenges. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 366-376.
32. Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Hafer, C.L., & Olson, J.M. (2003). An analysis of empirical research on the scope of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 311-323.
34. Hegtvedt, K.A. (2005). Doing justice to the group: Examining the roles of the group in justice research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 25-45.
35. Hegtvedt, K.A. (2006). Justice frameworks. In P. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 46-69). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. Hegtvedt, K.A. & Cook, K.S. (2001). Distributive justice: Recent theoretical developments and applications. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 93-132). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
37. Hegtvedt, K.A. & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K.S. Cook, A. Fine & J. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 257-280). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behavior. Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.
40. Homans, G.C. (1982). Foreword. In J. Greenberg & R.L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (pp. xi-xviii). New York: Academic Press.
41. Horai, J. (1977). Attributional conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 88-100.
42. Kazemi, A. (2007). Distributive and procedural fairness promote cooperative conflict management. In K. Törnblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice: Research and social applications (pp. 143-157). Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Company.
43. Kazemi, A., & Eek, D. (2008). Promoting cooperation in social dilemmas via fairness norms and group goals. In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Gärling & M. Gustafsson (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social Dilemmas (pp. 72-92). New York: Springer.
44. Kazemi, A., & Eek, D. (2007). Effects of group goal and resource valence on allocation preferences in public good dilemmas. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 803-818.
45. Kazemi, A., Eek, D., & Gärling, T. (2006). The interplay between greed, fairness, and group goal in allocation of public goods (Göteborg Psychological Reports, 36, No. 2). Sweden: Göteborg University, Department of Psychology.
46. Lazarus, R. (1982). Thoughts on the relationship between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019-1024.
47. Lerner, M.J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1-20.
48. Lerner, M. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
49. Leung, K., & Bond, M.H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 739-804.
50. Leventhal, G.S. (1976a). Fairness in social relations. In J.W. Thibaut, J.T. Spence, & R.C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211-239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
51. Leventhal, G.S. (1976b). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz and E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York: Academic Press.
52. Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
53. Lewicki, R.J., Wiethoff, C. & Tomlinson, E.C. (2005). What is the role of trust in organizational justice? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 247-270). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
54. Lind, E.A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Lind, E.A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P.C. (1990). Voice, control and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
56. Lind, E.A., Kulik, C.T., Ambrose, M., & de Vera Park, M.V (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
57. Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
58. Lind, E.A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In B.M. Staw & R.M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp.181-224). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
59. Markovsky, B. & Younts, C.W. (2001). Prospects for distributive justice theory. Social Justice Research, 14, 45-59.
60. Merton, R. & Rossi, A.S. (1957). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 3-19). New York: Free Press.
61. Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (pp. 127-166). New York: Springer-Verlag.
62. Mikula, G. & Schwinger, T. (1978). Intermember relations and reward allocation: Theoretical considerations of affects. In H. Brandstatter, J.H. Davis and H. Schuler (Eds.), Dynamics of group decisions (pp. 229-250). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
63. Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
64. Morris, M.W., & Leung, K. (2000). Justice for all? Progress in research on cultural variation in the psychology of distributive and procedural justice. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 100-132.
65. Mullen, E. (2007). The reciprocal relationship between affect and perceptions of fairness. In K. Tornblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice: Research and social applications (pp. 15-37). Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Company.
66. Reis, H.T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum Press.
67. Sabbagh, C. & Schmitt, M. (1998). Exploring the structure of positive and negative justice judgments. Social Justice Research, 11, 381-396.
68. Schachter, S. & Singer, J.E. (1962). Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379-399.
69. Shaver, K.G. (1985). The attribution of blame. New York: Springer-Verlag.
70. Skarlicki, D.P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
71. Skitka, L. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286-297.
72. Stouffer, S.A., Suchman, E.A., DeVinney, L.C., Star, S.A., & Williams, R.A. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustments during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
74. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75. Tornblom, K.Y. (1977). Distributive justice: Typology and propositions. Human Relations, 30, 1-24.
76. Tornblom, K.Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In E. Lawler, & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 5, pp. 141-168). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77. Tornblom, K.Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K.R. Scherer (Ed.), Distributive justice from an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 177-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Tornblom, K.Y. & Ahlin, E. (1998). Mode of accomplishing positive and negative outcomes: Its affect on fairness evaluations. Social Justice Research, 11, 425-444.
79. Tornblom, K.Y., & Foa, U.G. (1983). Choice of a distribution principle: Cross-cultural evidence on the effects of resources. Acta Sociologica, 26, 161-173.
80. Tornblom, K.Y., & Jonsson, D.R. (1985). Subrules of the equality and contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 249-261.
81. Tornblom, K.Y., & Jonsson, D.R. (1987). Distribution vs. retribution: The perceived justice of the contribution and equality principles for cooperative and competitive relationships. Acta Sociologica, 30, 25-52.
82. Tornblom K Y., Jonsson, D.R., & Foa, U.G. (1985). Nationality, resource class, and preference among three allocation rules: Sweden versus USA. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 51-77
83. Tornblom, K.Y. & Kazemi, A. (2007). Toward a resource production theory of distributive justice. In K. Tornblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice: Research and social applications (pp. 39-66). Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Company.
84. Tornblom, K.Y. & Vermunt, R. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12, 39-64.
85. Tornblom, K.Y. & Vermunt, R. (2007). Towards an integration of distributive justice, procedural justice, and social resource theories. Social Justice Research, 20, 312-335.
86. Tornblom, K.Y., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Social Justice Research (SpecialIssue), Vol. 11, No. 4.
87. Tornblom, K.Y., & Vermunt, R. (1999). Social Justice Research (SpecialIssue), Vol. 12, No. 1.
88. Tyler, T.R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
89. Tyler, T.R. (2005). Managing conflicts of interest within organizations: Does activating social values change the impact of self-interest on behavior? In D.A. Moore, D.M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M.H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 13-35). New York: Cambridge University Press.
90. Tyler, T.R., & Bies, R.J. (1990). Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology in business settings. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
91. Tyler, T.R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
92. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego: Academic Press.
93. Tyler, T.R., & Smith, H.J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 595-629). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
94. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E.A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046.
95. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 95-104.
96. Walster, E., Berscheid, E. & Walster, G.W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
97. Walster, E., Walster, G.W. And Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
98. Wilke, H.A.M. (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 165-187). New York: Wiley & Sons.
99. Younts, C.W. (1997). Justice, Expectations, and Procedural Consequences: Toward an Integrated Theory of Procedural and Distributive Justice. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meetings in Toronto, Canada.
100. Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175