Introduction: The relationship between positive and negative resource allocations and how they affect our justice conceptions

Social Justice Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 377-380

  Tornblom, Kjell ^a   Vermunt, Riël ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649085066     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022138306264     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Otten, S., and Mummenday, A. (1999). To our benefit or at your expense: Justice considerations in intergroup allocations of positive and negative resources. Social Justice Research, 12(1).
2. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1987). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In Hogarth, R. M., and Reder, M. W. (eds.), Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Törnblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In Lawler, E., and Markovsky, B. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 5, Jai Press, Greenwich, CT.
4. Törnblom, K. Y., and Vermunt, R. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12(1).
5. van Dijk, E., Engelen, van Leeuwen, Monden, and Sluijter (1999). Distributive justice and the allocation of costs, losses, and profits. Social Justice Research, 12(1).