The interplay between greed, efficiency, and fairness in public-goods dilemmas

Social Justice Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 195-215

  Eek, Daniel ^a,b   Biel, Anders ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Distributive justice; Efficiency; Fairness; Greed; Social dilemmas

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043114773     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025984611796     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Au, W. T., and Kwong, J. Y. Y. (in press). Measurements and effects of social value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In Suleiman, R., Budescu, D., Fischer, I., and Messick, D. (eds.), Contemporary Psychological Research on Social Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Biel, A., Eek, D., and Gärling, T. (1997). Distributive justice and willingness to pay for municipality child care. Soc. Justice Res. 10: 63-80.
3. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31: 169-193.
4. De Cremer, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. Eur. J. Pers. 15: 5-18.
5. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? J. Soc. Issu. 31: 137-149.
6. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
7. De Vries, S., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Constrained egoism and resource management under uncertainty. In Liebrand, W., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H., (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings Pergamon, Oxford, England, pp. 81-99.
8. Eek, D., Biel, A., and Gärling, T. (1998). The effect of distributive justice on willingness to pay for municipality child care: An extension of the GEF hypothesis. Soc. Justice Res. 11: 121-142.
9. Eek, D., Biel, A., and Gärling, T. (2000). Willingness to contribute to the finance of public social services. In Van Vugt, M., Snyder, M., Tyler, T., and Biel, A. (eds.), Cooperation in Modern Society: Promoting the Welfare of Communities, States and Organizations Routledge, London, (pp. 195-209).
10. Eek, D., Biel, A., and Gärling, T. (2001). Cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas when equality is perceived as unfair. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 31: 649-666.
11. Joireman, J. A., Kuhlman, D. M., and Okuda, H. (1994). Fairness judgements in an asymmetric public goods dilemma. In Shulz, U., Albers, W., and Mueller, U. (eds.), Social Dilemmas and Cooperation Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 99-116.
12. Kerr, N. L. (1995). Norms in social dilemmas. In Schroeder, D. (ed.), Social Dilemmas: Perspectives on Individuals and Groups, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 31-47.
13. Kerr, N. L., and Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66: 513-529.
14. Komorita, S. S., and Parks, C. D. (1994). Social Dilemmas, Brown & Benchmark, Madison, WI.
15. Kramer, R. M., and Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 1044-1057.
16. Marwell, G., and Ames, R. E. (1979). Experiments on provision of public goods. I. Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem. Am. J. Sociol. 84: 1335-1360.
17. Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., and Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 294-309.
18. Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., and Ordóñez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 629-639.
19. Roch, S. G., and Samuelson, C. D. (1997). Effects of environmental uncertainty and social value orientation in resource dilemmas. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70: 221-235.
20. Rutte, C. G., Messick, D., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1987). Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 23: 208-216.
21. Samuelson, C. D., and Messick, D. M. (1986). Alternative structural solutions to resource dilemmas. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37: 139-155.
22. Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Rutte, C. G., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47: 94-104.
23. Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. M., and Rutte, C. G. (1986). Individual restraint and structural change as a solution to social dilemmas. In Wilke, H., Messick, D., and Rutte, C. (eds.), Experimental Social Dilemmas, Verlag Peter Lang, New York, pp. 29-53.
24. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1993). Differential interests, equity, and public good provision. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 29: 1-16.
25. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1995). Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 31: 1-27.
26. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. (1997). Is it mine or is it ours? Framing property rights and decision making in social dilemmas. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 71: 195-209.
27. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. (2000). Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: Give-some, keep-some, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78: 92-104.
28. Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., Wilke, M., and Metman, L. (1999). What information do we use in social dilemmas? Environmental uncertainty and the employment of coordination rules. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 109-135.
29. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77: 337-349.
30. Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In Liebrand, W., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon, Oxford, England, pp. 3-28.
31. Van Lange, P. A. M., and Messick, D. M. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cooperation in social dilemmas. In Gasparski, W., Mlicki, M., and Banathy, B. (eds.), Social Agency: Dilemmas and Educational Praxiology, Transaction, New Brunswick, Canada pp. 93-112.
32. Wilke, H. A. M. (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. In Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M. (eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Wiley, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 165-187.
33. Wilke, H. A. M., Rutte, C. G., Wit, A. P., Messick, D. M., and Samuelson, C. D. (1986). Leadership in social dilemmas: Efficiency and equity. In Wilke, H. A. M., Messick, D. M., and Rutte, C. G. (eds.), Experimental Social Dilemmas, Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp. 55-76.
34. Wit, A., Wilke, H., and Oppewal, H. (1992). Fairness in asymmetric social dilemmas. In Liebrand, W., Messick, D., and Wilke, H. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon, Oxford, England, pp. 183-197.