Mode of accomplishing positive and negative outcomes: Its effect on fairness evaluations

Social Justice Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 423-442

  Törnblom, Kjell ^a   Ahlin, Elva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Justice; Outcome valence; Resource allocation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346544414     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022123324011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abelson, R. P., and Kanouse, D. E. (1966). Subjective acceptance of verbal generalizations. In Feldman S. (ed.), Cognitive Consistency, Academic Press, New York.
2. Brockner, J., Tyler, T., and Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher thay are, the harder they fall. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37:241-261.
3. Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B. M., Reed, T., Grover, S., and Martin, C. (1993). Interactive effect of job content and context on the reactions of layoff survivors. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 64:187-197.
4. Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 38:889-906.
5. Foa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science 71:345-351.
6. von Grumbkow, J. (1977). Verdeling van positieve en negatieve beloningen. Mens en Onderneming 31:285-294.
7. Hamilton, D., and Zanna, M. (1972). Differential weighting of favorable and unfavorable attributes in impression of personality. J. Exper. Res. Person. 6:204-212.
8. Hassebrauck, M. (1985). Retributive und distributive Gerechtigkeit im Aufteilungsverhalten von Kindern. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 17:164-171.
9. Hodges, B. (1974). Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 30:378-381.
10. Jasso, G. (1998). Exploring the justice of punishments: Framing, expressiveness, and the just prison sentence. Soc. Just. Res. 11:399-424.
11. Kayser, E. (n.d.). Laymen's social psychologies: The inference from social behaviors to group type. Universitat Mannheim, Germany, Undated manuscript.
12. Kayser, E., and Lamm, H. (1980). Input integration and input weighting in decisions on allocations of gains and losses. Euro. J. Soc. Psych. 10:1-15.
13. Kayser, E., and Schwinger, T. ( 1982). A theoretical analysis of the relationship among individual justice concepts, layman psychology and distribution decisions. J. Theor. Soc. Behav. 12:47-51.
14. Kayser, E., Schwinger, T., and Cohen, R. L. (1984). Laypersons' conceptions of social relationships: A test of contract theory. J. Soc. Person. Rel. 1:433-548.
15. van Kreveld, D., and van Beemen, E. (1978). Distributing goods and benefits: A framework and review of research. Cedrag. Tijdschrift voor Psychologie 6:361-401.
16. Lamm, H., and Kayser, E. (1978a). The allocation of monetary gain and loss following dyadic performance: The weight given to effort and ability under conditions of low and high intra-dyadic attraction. Euro. J. Soc. Psych. 8:275-278.
17. Lamm, H., and Kayser, E. (1978b). An analysis of negotiation concerning the allocation of jointly produced profit or loss: The roles of justice norms, politeness, profit maximization, and tactics. Intern. J. Croup Tens. 8:64-80.
18. Lamm, H., Kayser, E., and Schanz, V. (1983). An attributional analysis of interperpersonal justice: Ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gain and loss. J. Soc. Psych. 119:269-281.
19. Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Person. Soc. Psych. Bull. 13:524-536.
20. Meeker, B. F., and Elliott, G. C. (1987). Counting the costs: Equity and the allocation of negative group products. Soc. Psych. Quart. 50:7-15.
21. Pastore, N. A. (1960). A note on the changing toward liked and disliked persons. J. Soc. Psych. 52:173-175.
22. Richey, M., McClelland, L., and Shimkunas, A. (1967). Relative influence of positive and negative information in impression formation and persistence. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 6:322-327.
23. Rook, K. S. (1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological wellbeing. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 46:1097-1108.
24. Schmitt, M., and Montada, L. (1982). Determinanten erlebter Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 13:32-44.
25. Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. (1968). Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. J. Exper. Psych. 78:(PART 2).
26. Steensma, H., von Grumbkow, J., and Wilke, H. (1977). Boete, beloning en billijkheid. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 32:519-526.
27. Törnblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In Lawler, E., and Markovsky, B. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 5. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
28. Törnblom, K. Y., and Foa, U. G. (1983). Choice of a distribution principle: Crosscultural evidence on the effects of resources. Acta Sociologica 26:161-173.
29. Törnblom, K. Y., and Jonsson, D. R. (1985). Subrules of the equality and contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Soc. Psych. Quart. 48:249-261.
30. Törnblom, K. Y, and Jonsson, D. R. (1987). Distribution vs. retribution: The perceived justice of the contribution and equality principles for cooperative and competitive relationships. Acta Sociologica 30:25-52.
31. Törnblom, K. Y., Jonsson, D. R., and Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class, and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA. Intern. J. Intercult. Rel. 9:51-77.