Exploring the structure of positive and negative justice judgments

Social Justice Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 381-396

  Sabbagh, Clara ^a   Schmitt, Manfred ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Framing; Justice; Outcome valence

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042568846     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022119223102     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, S. J. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psych. 67(5):422-436.
2. Berger, J., Zelditch, M. Jr., Anderson, B., Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status-value formulation. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M. Jr., and Anderson, B. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp. 119-246.
3. Borg, I., and Shye, S. (1995). Facet Theory: The Method and Its Applications, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
4. Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.). The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173-202.
5. Cohen, R. L. (1987). Distributive justice: Theory and research. So. Just. Res. 1(1): 19-40.
6. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
7. Elster, J. (1989). Solomonic Judgements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Elster, J. ( 1992). Local Justice :How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Nece ssary Burdens, Russell Sage, New York.
9. Goodwin, B. (1992). Justice by Lottery, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Griffith, W. I. (1989). The allocation of negative outcomes. In Lawler, E. J. and Markovsky, B. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 6, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 107-137.
11. Hamilton, L. V., and Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
12. Hogan, R., and Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In Lerner, M. J. and Lemer, S. C. (eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 125-143.
13. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt Brace Janovich, New York.
14. Jasso, G. (1978). On the justice of earning: A new specification of the justice evaluation function. Am. J. Social. 83(6): 1398-1419.
15. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. Am. Social. Rev. 45:3-32.
16. Jasso, G. (1993). Choice and emotion in comparison theory. Rational. Soc. 5(2):231-274.
17. Kayser, E., and Lamm, H. (1980). Input integration and input weighting in decisions on allocations of gains and losses. Euro. J. Soc. Psych. 10:1-15.
18. Lamm, H., and Kayser, E. (1978). The allocation of monetary gain and loss following dyadic performance: The weight given to effort and ability under conditions of low and high intra-dyadic attraction. Euro. J. Soc. Psych. 8:275-278.
19. Lamm, H., Kayser, E., and Schanz, V. ( 1983). An attributional analysis of interpersonal justice: Ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gain and loss. J. Soc. Psych. 119:269-281.
20. Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Person. Soc. Psych. Bull. 13:524-536.
21. Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. J. Soc. Iss. 31:1-20.
22. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. J. Spence, J. J., and Carson, R. C. (eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ, pp. 211-239.
23. Levy, S. (Ed.) (1994). Louis Gunman on Theory and Methodology: Selected Writings, Dartmouth, Hampshire, England.
24. Meeker, B. F., and Elliot, G. C. (1987). Counting the costs: Equity and the allocation of negative group products. Soc. Psych. Quart. 50(1):7-15.
25. Mikula, G., and Mueller, G. R (1983). Procedural preferences in the allocations of jointly produced gains and losses. J. Soc. Psych. 121:117-124.
26. Mummendey, A., and Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. Euro. Rev. Soc. Psych. 9:107-144.
27. Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J. J., Purnima, S., Pachauri, A., and Kumar, P. (1984). Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 46(6): 1267-1272.
28. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Sabbagh, C. (1998). Theoretical Structures of Justice Judgments and Their Empirical Examination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew).
30. Sabbagh, C., Dar, Y., and Resh, N. (1994). The structure of social justice judgments: A facet approach. Soc. Psych. Quart. 57(3): 244-261.
31. Schmitt, M. (1996). Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice. Person. Individ. Diff. 21:3-20.
32. Schmitt, M., and Montada, L. (1982). Determination erlebter Gerechtichkeit. (Determinants of Experienced Justice). Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 13:32-44.
33. Schoekkaert, E., and Overlaet, B. (1989). Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justice. Soc. Choice welfare 6:19-31.
34. Shklar, J. M. (1990). The Faces of Injustice, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
35. Törnblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In Lawler, E. J., and Markovsky, B. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141-168.
36. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In Scherer, K. R. (ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 177-285.
37. Törnblom, K. Y., and Foa, U. G. (1983). Choice of a distribution principle: Crosscultural evidence on the effects of resources. Acta Sociologica 26(2):161-173.
38. Törnblom, K. Y, and Jonsson, D. R. (1985). Subrules of the equality of contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Soc. Psych. Quart. 48 (3):249-261.
39. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1987). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In Hogarth, R. M., and Reder, M. W. (eds.), Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 67-94.
40. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., and Walster, W. G. (1973). New directions in equity research. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 25(2): 151-176.
41. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, Basic Books, New York.