Towards an integration of distributive justice, procedural justice, and social resource theories

Social Justice Research

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 312-335

  Törnblom, Kjell Y ^a   Vermunt, Riël ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Congruence; Discrepancy; Distributive justice; Equity theory; Isomorphism; Procedural justice; Resource theory; Theoretical integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 36649014334     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-007-0054-8     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adams, S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2. Adams, S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
3. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296-304.
4. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewecki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, Vol. 1 (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Brockner, J., & Weisenfeld, B. M. (1996). The interactive impact of procedural and outcome fairness on reactions to a decision: The effects of wat you do depend on how you do it. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
6. Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1964). Delinquency and opportunity. New York: Free Press.
7. Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 119-151). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
9. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Donnenwerth, G. V., & Foa, U. G. (1974). Effect of resource class on retaliation to injustice in interpersonal exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 785-793.
11. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
12. Foa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171, 345-351.
13. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
14. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1976). Resource theory and social excahnge. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 99-131). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
15. Foa, U. G., Converse, J., Törnblom, K. Y., & Foa, E. B. (Eds.) (1993), Resource theory: Explorations and applications. New York: Academic Press.
16. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of 'voice' and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
17. Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 1, 143-160.
18. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
19. Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691-701.
20. Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 55-61.
21. Greenberg, J., & Cohen R. L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In J. Greenberg, & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 437-469). NY: Academic Press.
22. Hegtvedt, K. A., Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 257-280). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
23. Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.
24. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
25. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 447-458.
26. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. NY: Harcourt, Brace.
27. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. NY: Harcourt, Brace.
28. Jasso, G. (1990). Methods for the theoretical and empirical analysis of comparison processes. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 369-419). Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.
29. Jasso, G. (1998). Exploring the justice of punishments: Framing, expressiveness, and the just prison sentence. Social Justice Research, 11, 399-424.
30. Jasso, G., & Wegener, B. (1997). Methods for empirical justice analysis: Part I. Framework, models, and quantities. Social Justice Research, 10, 393-430.
31. Kayser, E., & Lamm, H. (1980). Input integration and input weighting in decisions on allocations of gains and losses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 1-15.
32. Kayser, E., & Schwinger, T. (1982). A theoretical analysis of the relationship among individual justice concepts, layman psychology and distribution decisions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 12, 47-51.
33. Lansberg, I. (1981). Distributive justice: A theoretical overview of fairness in organizations. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.
34. Lansberg, I. (1984). Hierarchy as a mediator of fairness: A contingency approach to distributive justice in organizations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 124-135.
35. Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1-20.
36. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
37. Lerner, M. J., & Whitehead, L. A. (1980). Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice in social interaction (pp. 219-256). New York: Springer Verlag.
38. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211-239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
39. Leventhal, G. S., & Michaels, J. W. (1969). Extending the equity model: Perceptions of inputs and allocations of reward as a function of duration and quantity of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 303-309.
40. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.) Social exchange. Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
41. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Meeker, B. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review, 36, 485-495.
44. Mikula, G., & Schwinger, T. (1978). Intermember relations and reward allocation: Theoretical considerations of affects. In H. Brandstätter, J. H. Davis, & H. Schuler (Eds.), Dynamics of group decisions (pp. 229-250). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Mowday, R. T. (1996). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In R. M. Steers, L. W. Porter, & G. A. Bigley (Eds.), Motivation and leadership at work (pp. 53-71). New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Opsahl, R. L., & Dunnette, M. (1966). The role of financial compensation in industrial motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 94-118.
47. Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: Life cycles of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Sabbagh, C., Dar, Y., & Resh, N. (1994). The structure of social justice judgments: A facet approach. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 244-261.
49. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25) (pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Törnblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In E. Lawler, & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 5, pp. 141-168). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
52. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. Scherer (Eds.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177-236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Törnblom, K. Y., & Ahlin, E. (1998). Mode of accomplishing positive and negative outcomes: Its affect on fairness evaluations. Social Justice Research, 11, 425-444.
54. Törnblom, K. Y., & Foa, U. G. (1983). Choice of a distribution principle: Crosscultural evidence on the effects of resources. Acta Sociologica, 26, 161-173.
55. Törnblom, K.Y., & Jonsson, D. R. (1985). Subrules of the equality and contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 249-261.
56. Törnblom, K. Y., Jonsson, D. R., & Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class, and preference among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 51-77.
57. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (1998a). Introduction: The relationship between positive and negative resource allocations and how they affect our justice conceptions. Social Justice Research, 11, 377-380.
58. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (Eds) (1998b) Special issue on "Fairness conceptions in the contexts of positive and negative resource allocations: Part I." Social Justice Research, 11, 377-442.
59. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12, 39-64.
60. Turner, J. H. (2007). Justice and emotions. Social Justice Research, doi: 10.1007/s11211-007-0043-y.
61. Vermunt, R., Wit, A., Vanden Bos, K., & Lind, A. (1996). The effects ofunfair procedure on negative affect and protest. Social Justice Research, 9, 109-121.
62. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
63. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. In L. Berkowitz, & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Equity theory: Toward a general theory of social interaction) (pp. 1-38). New York: Academic Press.
64. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
65. Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Younts, C. W. (1997). Justice, expectations, and procedural consequences: Toward an integrated theory of procedural and distributive justice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (Toronto, Canada).