Prospects for distributive justice theory

Social Justice Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 45-59

  Markovsky, Barry ^a   Wesley Younts, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributive justice theory; Scientific subdiscipline; Theoretical progress

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842802767     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012523707712     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 267-299.
2. Alessio, J. C. (1980). Another folly for equity theory. Soc. Psychol. Q. 43: 336-340.
3. Anderson, N. H. (1976). Equity judgments as information integration. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 33: 291-299.
4. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory, Academic Press, New York.
5. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., and Wagner, D. G. ( 1983). The formation of reward expectations in status situations. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.), Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger Press, New York, pp. 127-168.
6. Berger, J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (eds.). (1993). Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
7. Berger, J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1997). Theoretical research programs: A reformulation. In Szmatka, J., Skvoretz, J., and Berger, J. (eds.), Status, Network and Structure: Theory Development in Group Processes, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 29-416.
8. Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., Anderson, B., and Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., and Anderson, B. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, Vol. 2, pp. 119-146.
9. Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., and Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Acad. Manag. J. 37(2): 397-409.
10. Brockner, J., and Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychol. Bull. 120: 189-208.
11. Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In Schupp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Book I, Open Court Press, La Salle, IL, pp. 413-463.
12. Cohen, B. P. (1989). Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method, 2ndedn., Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
13. Cole, S. (1994). Why sociology doesn't make progress like the natural sciences. Social. Forum 9: 133-154.
14. Cook, K. S., and Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annu. Rev. Social. 9:217-241.
15. Cook, K. S., and Hegtvedt, K. A. (1986). Justice and power: An exchange analysis. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 19-41.
16. Cropanzano, R., and Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. J. Appl. Psychol. 74(2): 293-299.
17. Crosby, F (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychol. Rev. 83: 85-113.
18. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, or need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? / Soc. Issues 31: 137-150.
19. Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
20. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A réfèrent cognitions model. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 145-160.
21. Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Acad. Manag. J. 32(1): 115-130.
22. Folger, R., and Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and réfèrent cognitions: Distributive and pro-cedural justice effects. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22: 531-546.
23. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Rheaume, K., and Martin, C. (1983b). Relative deprivation and réfèrent cognitions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19: 172-184.
24. Folger, R., Rosenfeld, D., and Robinson, T. (1983a). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 268-273.
25. Freese, L. (1980). The problem of cumulative knowledge. In Freese, L. (ed.), Theoretical Methods in Sociology: Seven Essays, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 13-69.
26. Harris, R. J. (1976). Handling negative inputs: On the plausibility of equity formulae. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 12: 194-209.
27. Hegtvedt, K. A., and Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In Cook, K. S., Fine, G. A., and House, J. S. (eds.), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 257-280.
28. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York.
29. Jasso, G. (1978). On the justice of earnings: A new specification of the justice evaluation function. Am. J. Social. 83: 1398-1419.
30. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. Am. Social. Rev. 45: 3-32.
31. Jasso, G. (1983). Fairness of individual rewards and fairness of the reward distribution: Specifying the conflict between the micro and macro principles of justice. Soc. Psychol. Q. 46: 185-199.
32. Jasso, G. (1986). A new representation of the just term in distributive justice theory: Its properties and operation in theoretical derivation and empirical estimation. J. Math. Social. 12(3): 251-274.
33. Jasso, G. (1993a). Building the theory of comparison processes: Construction of postulates and derivation of predictions. In Berger, J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (eds.), Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 213-264.
34. Jasso, G. (1993b). Analyzing conflict severity: Predictions of distributive-justice theory for the two subgroup case. Soc. Just. Res. 6: 357-382.
35. Jasso, G. (1994). Assessing individual and group differences in the sense of justice: Framework and application to gender differences in the justice of earnings. Soc. Sci. Res. 23: 368-4106.
36. Jasso, G. (1998). Exploring the justice of punishments: Framing, expressiveness, and the just prison sentence. Soc. Just. Res. 11(4): 397-422.
37. Jasso, G., and Webster, M., Jr. (1997). Double standards in just earnings for male and female workers. Soc. Psychol. Q. 60: 66-78.
38. Jasso, G., and Webster, M., Jr. (1999). Assessing the gender gap in just earnings and its underlying mechanisms. Soc. Psychol. Q. 62(4): 367-380.
39. Jasso, G., and Wegener, B. (1997). Methods for empirical justice analysis: Part 1. Framework, models, and quantities. Soc. Just. Res. 10(4): 393-4130.
40. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 201-208.
41. Lakatos, I. ( 1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 91-196.
42. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., Jr., and Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula, G. (ed.), Justice in Social Interaction, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 167-218.
43. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
44. Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory. Am. Social. Rev. 50: 822-839.
45. Markovsky, B. (1988). Injustice and arousal. Soc. Just. Res. 2: 223-233.
46. Markovsky, B. (1997a). Building and testing multilevel theories. In Szmatka, J., Skvoretz, J., and Berger, J. (eds.), Status, Network and Structure: Theory Development in Group Processes, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 13-28.
47. Markovsky, B. (1997b). Evolution and nebulousness in theories. Curr. Res. Soc. Psychol. 2(3): 24-29, http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc.
48. Markovsky, B., Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., Lovaglia, M. J., and Erger, J. (1993). The seeds of weak power: An extension of network exchange theory. Am. Social. Rev. 58: 197-209.
49. Markovsky, B., Willer, D., and Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. Am. Social. Rev. 53: 220-236.
50. Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In Olson, J. M., Herman, C. P., and Zanna, M. P. (eds.), Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 217-242.
51. Meilers, B. A. (1982). Equity judgment: A revision of Aristotelian views./ Exp. Psychol. Gen. 111(2): 242-270.
52. Merton, R. K., and Rossi, A. ( 1968). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In Merton, R. K. (ed.), Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, New York, pp. 279-334.
53. Mikula, G. (1980). Justice and Social Interaction, Springer-Verlag, New York.
54. Moschetti, G. J. (1979). Calculating equity: Ordinal and ratio criteria. Soc. Psychol. Q. 42: 172-176.
55. Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York.
56. Popper, K. R. (1968). Truth, rationality, and the growth of scientific knowledge. In Popper, K. R. (ed.), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 215-250.
57. Stouffer, S., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Starr, S., and Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American Soldier, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
58. Törnblom, K. (1977). Distributive justice: Typology and propositions. Hum. Rel. 31: 1-24.
59. Törnblom, K. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and model for conflicting justice principles. In Lawler, E. J., and Markovsky, B. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
60. Törnblom, K., and Vermunt, R. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Soc. Just. Res. 12(1): 39-64.
61. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Philosophy of Science, Hutchinson, London,
62. van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 95-104.
63. Wagner, D. G. (1984). The Growth of Sociological Theories, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
64. Wagner, D. G., and Berger, J. (1985). Do sociological theories grow? Am. J. Social. 90: 697-728.
65. Walker, H. A., Thye, S., Simpson, B., Lovaglia, M., Willer, D., and Markovsky, B. (2000). Network exchange theory: Recent developments and new directions. Soc. Psychol. Q. 63: 324-337.
66. Walster, E., Walster, G., and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity Theory and Research, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
67. Willer, D. (ed.). (1999a). Network Exchange Theory, Praeger, Westport, CT.
68. Willer, D. (1999b). The discovery of weak power. In Willer, D. (ed.), Network Exchange Theory, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 109-126.