Structural biology by NMR: Structure, dynamics, and interactions

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Markwick, Phineus R L ^a   Malliavin, Thérèse ^a   Nilges, Michael ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

3D STRUCTURE; BIOMACROMOLECULE; CONFORMATIONAL DYNAMICS; FLEXIBLE SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DATA; RESONANCE INTERACTION; RESONANCE STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY; STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS; STRUCTURE DYNAMICS;

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

NITROGEN 15; PROTEIN;

ENZYME KINETICS; MACROMOLECULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 52949121796     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000168     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Wishart DS (2005) NMR spectroscopy and protein structure determination: Applications to drug discovery and development. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 6: 105-120.
2. Liu HL, Hsu JP (2005) Recent developments in structural proteomics for protein structure determination. Proteomics 5: 2056-2068.
3. Altieri AS, Byrd RA (2004) Automation of NMR structure determination of proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14: 547-553.
4. Tugarinov V, Hwang PM, Kay LE (2004) Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of highmolecular-weight proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 107-146.
5. Bouvignies G, Markwick PRL, Blackledge MJ (2007) Simultaneous definition of high resolution protein structure and backbone conformational dynamics using NMR residual dipolar couplings. Chemphyschem 8: 1901-1909.
6. Wüthrich K (1986) NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. New York: John Wiley.
7. Iwahara J, Clore GM (2006) Detecting transient intermediates in macromolecular binding by paramagnetic NMR. Nature 440: 1227-1230.
8. Tolman JR, Flanagan JM, Kennedy MA, Prestegard JH (1997) NMR evidence for slow collective motions in cyanometmyoglobin. Nature Struct Biol 4: 292-297.
9. Tjandra N, Bax A (1997) Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278: 1111-1114.
10. Wishart DS, Case DA (2001) Use of chemical shifts in macromolecular structure determination. Methods Enzymol 338: 3-34.
11. Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M (2007) Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 9615-9620.
12. Shen Y, Lange O, Delaglio F, Rossi P, Aramini JM, et al. (2008) Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 4685-4690.
13. Castellani F, van Rossum B, Diehl A, Schubert M, Rehbein K, et al. (2002) Structure of a protein determined by solid-state magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy. Nature 420: 98-102.
14. Loquet A, Bardiaux B, Gardiennet C, Blancher C, Baldus M, et al. (2008) 3D structure determination of the crh protein from highly ambiguous solid-state NMR restraints. JACS. pp 3579-3589.
15. Yee A, Gutmanas A, Arrowsmith CH (2006) Solution NMR in structural genomics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006: 611-617.
16. Güntert P (2004) Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol Biol 278: 353-378.
17. Kainosho M, Torizawa T, Iwashita Y, Terauchi T, Ono AM, et al. (2006) Optimal isotope labelling for NMR protein structure determinations. Nature 440: 52-57.
18. Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, et al. (2005) The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59: 687-696.
19. Huang YJ, Moseley HN, Baran MC, Arrowsmith C, Powers R, et al. (2005) An integrated platform for automated analysis of protein NMR structures. Methods Enzymol 394: 111-141.
20. Kuszewski J, Schwieters CD, Garrett DS, Byrd RA, Tjandra N, et al. (2004) Completely automated, highly error-tolerant macromolecular structure determination from multidimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectra and chemical shift assignments. J Am Chem Soc 126: 6258-6273.
21. Rieping W, Habeck M, Bardiaux B, Bernard A, Malliavin TE, et al. (2007) ARIA2: Automated NOE assignment and data integration in NMR structure calculation. Bioinformatics 23: 381-382.
22. Herrmann T, Güntert P, Wüthrich K (2002) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J Mol Biol 319: 209-227.
23. Huang YJ, Tejero R, Powers R, Montelione GT (2006) A topology-constrained distance network algorithm for protein structure determination from NOESY data. Proteins 62: 587-603.
24. Jung YS, Zweckstetter M (2004) Mars - Robust automatic backbone assignment of proteins. J Biomol NMR 30: 11-23.
25. Lopez-Mendez B, Güntert P (2006) Automated protein structure determination from NMR spectra. J Am Chem Soc 128: 13112-13122.
26. Grishaev A, Llinas M (2005) Protein structure elucidation from minimal NMR data: The CLOUDS approach. Methods Enzymol 394: 261-295.
27. Ab E, Pugh DJ, Kaptein R, Boelens R, Bonvin AM (2006) Direct use of unassigned resonances in NMR structure calculations with proxy residues. J Am Chem Soc 128: 7566-7571.
28. Hus JC, Marion D, Blackledge M (2001) Determination of protein backbone structure using only residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 123: 1541-1542.
29. Kontaxis G, Delaglio F, Bax A (2005) Molecular fragment replacement approach to protein structure determination by chemical shift and dipolar homology database mining. Methods Enzymol 394: 42-78.
30. Wang L, Mettu RR, Donald BR (2006) A polynomial-time algorithm for de novo protein backbone structure determination from nuclear magnetic resonance data. J Comput Biol 13: 1267-1288.
31. Meiler J, Baker D (2003) Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15404-15409.
32. 15N chemical shift mapping and backbone 15n-1h residual dipolar couplings using conjoined rigid body/torsion angle dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 125: 2902-2912.
33. Grishaev A, Wu J, Trewhella J, Bax A (2005) Refinement of multidomain protein structures by combination of solution small-angle X-ray scattering and NMR data. J Am Chem Soc 127: 16621-16628.
34. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin A (2003) HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 125: 1731-1737.
35. Horst R, Wider G, Fiaux J, Bertelsen EB, Horwich AL, et al. (2006) Proton-proton Overhauser NMR spectroscopy with polypeptide chains in large structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 15445-15450.
36. Sprangers R, Kay LE (2007) Quantitative dynamics and binding studies of the 20S proteasome by NMR. Nature 445: 618-622.
37. Williams DC Jr, Cai M, Suh JY, Peterkofsky A, Clore GM (2005) Solution NMR structure of the 48-kda IIAMannose-HPr complex of the Escherichia coli mannose phosphotransferase system. J Biol Chem 280: 20775-20784.
38. Tang C, Iwahara J, Clore GM (2006) Visualization of transient encounter complexes in protein-protein association. Nature 444: 383-386.
39. Bhattacharya A, Tejero R, Montelione GT (2007) Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia. Proteins 66: 778-795.
40. Nabuurs SB, Spronk CA, Krieger E, Maassen H, Vriend G, et al. (2003) Quantitative evaluation of experimental NMR restraints. J Am Chem Soc 125: 12026-12034.
41. Rieping W, Habeck M, Nilges M (2005) Inferential structure determination. Science 309: 303-306.
42. Nicastro G, Habeck M, Masino L, Svergun DI, Pastore A (2006) Structure validation of the Josephin domain of ataxin-3: Conclusive evidence for an open conformation. J Biomol NMR 36: 267-277.
43. Huang YJ, Powers R, Montelione GT (2005) Protein NMR recall, precision, and f-measure scores (RPF scores): Structure quality assessment measures based on information retrieval statistics. J Am Chem Soc 127: 1665-1674.
44. Linge JP, Williams MA, Spronk CA, Bonvin AM, Nilges M (2003) Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent. Proteins 50: 496-506.
45. Nederveen AJ, Doreleijers JF, Vranken W, Miller Z, Spronk CA, et al. (2005) RECOORD: A recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank. Proteins 59: 662-672.
46. Jack A, Levitt M (1978) Refinement of large structures by simultaneous minimization of energy and R factor. Acta Cryst A34: 931-935.
47. Brunger AT, Nilges M (1993) Computational challenges for macromolecular structure determination by X-ray crystallography and solution NMR spectroscopy. Quart Rev BioPhys 26: 49-125.
48. Spronk CA, Nabuurs SB, Bonvin AM, Krieger E, Vuister GW, et al. (2003) The precision of NMR structure ensembles revisited. J Biomol NMR 25: 225-234.
49. Snyder DA, Montelione GT (2005) Clustering algorithms for identifying core atom sets and for assessing the precision of protein structure ensembles. Proteins 59: 673-686.
50. Nabuurs SB, Spronk CA, Vuister GW, Vriend G (2006) Traditional biomolecular structure determination by NMR spectroscopy allows for major errors. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e9. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020009.
51. Habeck M, Rieping W, Nilges M (2006) Weighting of experimental evidence in macromolecular structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 1756-1761.
52. Habeck M, Nilges M, Rieping W (2005) Replica-exchange Monte Carlo scheme for Bayesian data analysis. Phys Rev Lett 94: 018105.
53. Kim Y, Prestegard JH (1989) A dynamic model for the structure of acyl carrier protein in solution. Biochemistry 28: 8792-8797.
54. Torda AE, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF (1990) Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat. J Mol Biol 214: 223-235.
55. Lindorff-Larsen K, Best RB, Depristo MA, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M (2005) Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 433: 128-132.
56. Henzler-Wildman KA, Lei M, Thai V, Kerns SJ, Karplus M, et al. (2007) A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis. Nature 450: 913-916.
57. Lipari G, Szabo A (1982) Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J Am Chem Soc 104: 4546-4559.
58. Woessner DE (1965) Nuclear magnetic dipole-dipole relaxation in molecules with internal motion. J Chem Phys 42: 1855-1859.
59. Daragan VA, Mayo KH (1997) Motional model analyses of protein and peptide dynamics using 13C and 15N NMR relaxation. Prog NMR Spectrosc 31: 63-105.
60. Chang SL, Tiandra N (2001) Molecular dynamics and NMR spin relaxation in proteins. J Am Chem Soc 123: 11484-11485.
61. Bremi T, Bruschweiler R (1997) Locally anisotropic internal polypeptide backbone dynamics by NMR relaxation. J Am Chem Soc 119: 6672-6673.
62. Zhang F, Brüschweiler R (2002) Contact model for the prediction of NMR NH order parameters in globular proteins. J Am Chem Soc 124: 12654-12655.
63. Abergel D, Bodenhausen G (2005) Predicting internal protein dynamics from structures using coupled networks of hindered rotators. J Chem Phys 123: 204901.
64. Bruschweiler R (2003) New approaches to the dynamic interpretation and prediction of NMR relaxation data from proteins. Curr Opion Struct Biol 13: 175-183.
65. Markwick PRL, Sattler M (2004) Site-specific variations of cabonyl chemical shift anisotropies in proteins. J Am Chem Soc 126: 11424-11425.
66. Markwick PRL, Sprangers R, Sattler M (2005) Local structure and anisotropic backbone dynamics from cross-correlated NMR relaxation in proteins. Ang Chem Int Ed 44: 3232-3237.
67. Case DA (2002) Molecular dynamics and NMR spin relaxation in proteins. Acc Chem Res 35: 325-331.
68. Mackerell AD Jr (2004) Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues. J Comput Chem 25: 1584-1604.
69. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, et al. (2006) Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 65: 712-725.
70. Markwick PR, Bouvignies G, Blackledge M (2007) Exploring multiple timescale motions in protein GB3 using accelerated molecular dynamics and NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 129: 4724-4730.
71. Loth K, Pelupessy P, Bodenhausen G (2005) Chemical shift anisotropy tensors of carbonyl, nitrogen and amide proton nuclei in proteins through cross-correlated relaxation in NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 127: 6062-6068.
72. Tugarinov V, Liang Z, Shapiro YE, Freed JH, Meirovitch E (2001) A structural mode-coupling approach to 15N NMR relaxation in proteins. J Am Chem Soc 123: 3055-3063.
73. Ulmer TA, Ramirez BE, Delaglio F, Bax A (2003) Evaluation of backbone proton postions and dynamics in a small protein by liquid crystal NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 125: 9179-9191.
74. Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2004) How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation? J Am Chem Soc 126: 2923-2938.
75. Peti W, Meiler J, Bruschweiler R, Griesinger C (2002) Model-free analysis of protein backbone motion from residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 124: 5822-5833.
76. Lakomek NA, Carlomagno T, Becker S, Griesinger C (2006) A thorough dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in ubiquitin. J Biomol NMR 34: 101-115.
77. Briggman KB, Tolman JR (2003) De novo determination of bond orientations and order parameters from residual dipolar couplings with high accuracy. J Am Chem Soc 125: 10164-10165.
78. Bouvignies G, Bernado P, Meier S, Cho K, Grzesiek S, et al. (2005) Identification of slow correlated motions in proteins using residual dipolar couplings and hydrogen-bond scaler couplings. Proc Nat Acad Sci 102: 13885-13890.
79. Bouvignies G, Markwick PRL, Bruschweiler R, Blackledge M (2006) Simultaneous determination of protein backbone structure and dynamics from residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 128: 15100-15101.
80. Vallurupalli P, Hansen DF, Stollar E, Meirovitch E, Kay LE (2007) Measurement of bond vector orientations in invisible excited states of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 18473-18477.
81. Loria JP, Rance M, Palmer AG (1999) A relaxation-compensated carr-purcell-meilboomgill sequence for characterizing chemical exchange by NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 121: 2331-2332.
82. Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wüthrich K (1997) Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 94: 12366-12371.
83. Osborne MJ, Schnell J, Benkovic SJ, Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2001) Backbone dynamics in dihydrofolate reductase complexes: Role of loop flexibility in the catalytic mechanism. Biochemistry 40: 9846-9859.
84. Cole R, Loria JP (2002) Evidence for flexibility in the function of ribonuclease A. Biochemistry 41: 6072-6081.
85. Eisenmesser EZ, Bosco DA, Akke M, Kern D (2002) Enzyme dynamics during catalysis. Science 295: 1520-1523.
86. Feher VA, Cavanagh J (1999) Millisecond-timescale motions contribute to the function of the bacterial response regulator protein SpoOF. Nature 400: 289-293.
87. Mulder FAA, Mittermaier AA, Hon B, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE (2001) Studying excited states of proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Nat Struct Biol 8: 932-935.
88. Volkman BF, Lipson D, Wemmer D, Kern D (2001) Two-state allosteric behaviour in a single-domain signaling protein. Science 291: 2429-2433.
89. Korzhnev DM, Salvatella X, Vendruscolo M, Nardo AAD, Davidson AR, et al. (2004) Lowpopulated folding intermediates of fyn sh3 characterized by relaxation dispersion NMR. Nature 430: 586-590.
90. Eisenmesser EZ, Millet O, Labeikovsky W, Korzhnev DM, Wolf-Watz M, et al. (2005) Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis. Nature 438: 117-121.
91. Vallurupalli P, Hansen DF, Kay LE (2008) Probing structure in invisible protein states with anisotropic NMR chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 130: 2734-2735.
92. Wang L, Pang Y, Holder T, Brender JR, Kurochkin AV, et al. (2001) Functional dynamics in the active site of the ribonuclease binase. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 98: 7684-7689.
93. Grubmüller H (1995) Predicting slow structural transistions in macromolecular systems: Conformational flooding. Phys Rev E 52: 2893-2907.
94. Hamelberg D, Mongan J, McCammon JA (2004) Fast peptidyl cis-trans isomerization within the flexible Gly-rich flaps of HIV-1 protease. J Chem Phys 120: 11919-11929.
95. Elber R (2005) Long-timescale simulation methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15: 151-156.
96. Schulze BG, Grubmüller H, Evanseck JD (2000) Functional significance of hierachical tiers in carbonmonoxy myoglobin: Conformational substates and transitions studied by conformational flooding simulations. J Am Chem Soc 122: 8700-8711.
97. Hamelberg D, McCammon JA (2005) Accelerated molecular dynamics: A promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. J Am Chem Soc 127: 13778-13779.
98. Nederveen AJ, Bonvin AMJJ (2005) NMR relaxation and internal dynamics of ubiquitin from a 0.2 μs MD simulation. J Chem Theory and Comput 1: 363-374.
99. Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 197-208.
100. Shortle D, Ackerman MS (2001) Persistence of native-like topology in a denatured protein in 8 m urea. Science 293: 487-489.
101. Bernardo P, Blanchard L, Timmins P, Marion D, Ruigrok WH, et al. (2005) A structural model for unfolded proteins from residual dipolar couplings and small-angle x-ray scattering. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 102: 17002-17007.
102. Jha AK, Colubri A, Freed K, Sosnick T (2005) Statistical coil model of the unfolded state: Resolving the reconciliation problem. Proc Nat Acad Sci 102: 13099-13104.
103. Mukrasch MD, Markwick PRL, Biernat J, von Bergen M, Bernado P, et al. (2007) Highly populated turn conformations in natively unfolded tau protein identified from residual dipolar couplings and molecular simulation. J Am Chem Soc 129: 5235-5243.