How Much Backbone Motion in Ubiquitin Is Required to Account for Dipolar Coupling Data Measured in Multiple Alignment Media as Assessed by Independent Cross-Validation?

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 2923-2938

  Clore, G Marius ^a   Schwieters, Charles D ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CHEMICAL BONDS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SIMULATED ANNEALING; TENSORS; TORSIONAL STRESS; VECTORS;

DIPOLAR COUPLINGS; TORSION ANGLE;

PROTEINS;

CARBON; HYDROGEN; NITROGEN; UBIQUITIN;

ACCURACY; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ATOM; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; THERMODYNAMICS; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 1542317796     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0386804     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. (a) Wagner, G. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1983, 16, 1-57.
2. (b) Torchia, D. A. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 1984, 13, 125-144.
3. (c) Ringe, D.; Petsko, G. A. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 1985, 45, 197-235.
4. (d) Petsko, G. A.; Karplus, M. Nature 1990, 347, 631-639.
5. (e) Englander, S. W.; Sosnick, T. R.; Englander, J. J.; Mayne, L. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996, 6, 18-23.
6. (f) Kay, L. E. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, S513-S517.
7. (g) Ishima, R.; Torchia, D. A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7, 740-743.
8. (h) Wand, A. J. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 926-931.
9. (i) Palmer, A. G., III. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30, 129-1551.
10. (j) Karplus, M.; McCammon, J. A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 646-652.
11. (k) Frauenfleder, H.; McMahon, B. H.; Fenimore, B. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 8615-8617.
12. (a) Tjandra, N.; Bax, A. Science 1997, 278, 1111-1114.
13. (b) Clore, G. M.; Starich, M. R.; Gronenborn, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10571-10572.
14. (c) Hansen, M. R.; Mueller, L.; Pardi, A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 1065-1074.
15. (d) Prestegard, J. H.; Al-Hashimi, H. M.; Tolman, J. R. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2000, 33, 371-424.
16. (e) Bax, A.; Kontaxis, G.; Tjandra, N. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 339, 127-174.
17. (a) Tjandra, N.; Omichinski, J. G.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Clore, G. M.; Bax, A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 4, 732-739.
18. (b) Bewley, C. A.; Gustfason, K. R.; Boyd, M. R.; Covell, D. G.; Bax, A. ; Clore, G. M.; Gronenborn, A. M. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 571-578.
19. (c) Clore, G. M.; Starich, M. R.; Bewley, C. A.; Cai, M.; Kuszewski, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6513-6514.
20. (d) Clore, G. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 97, 9021-9025.
21. (e) Skrynnikov, N. R.; Goto, N. K.; Yang, D.; Choi, W. Y.; Tolman, J. R. ; Mueller, G. A.; Kay, L. E. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 1265-1273.
22. (f) Goto, N. K.; Skrynnikov, N. R.; Dalhquist, F. W.; Kay, L. E. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 308, 745-764.
23. (g) Clore, G. M.; Schwieters, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2902-2912.
24. Tolman, J. R.; Flanagan, J. M.; Kennedy, M. A.; Prestegard, J. H. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 292-297.
25. (a) Tolman, J. R.; Al-Hashimi, H. M.; Kay, L. E.; Prestegard, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1416-1424.
26. (b) Tolman, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12020-12030.
27. (c) Briggman, K. B.; Tolman, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10164-10165.
28. Meiler, J.; Prompers, J. J.; Peti, W.; Griesinger, C.; Brüschweiler, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6098-6107.
29. (a) Peti, W.; Meiler, J.; Brüschweiler, R.; Griesinger, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5822-5833.
30. (b) Meiler, J.; Peti, W.; Griesinger, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8072-8073.
31. Hus, J.-C.; Peti, W.; Griesinger, C.; Brüschweiler, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5596-5597.
32. Bax, A.; Tjandra, N. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 254-256.
33. Vijay-Kumar, S.; Bugg, C. E.; Cook, W. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 194, 531-544.
34. Ulmer, T. S.; Ramirez, B. E.; Delaglio, F.; Bax, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9179-9191.
35. Cornilescu, G.; Marquardt, J. L.; Ottiger, M.; Bax, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6836-6837.
36. Zweckstetter, M.; Bax, A. J. Biomol. NMR 2002, 23, 127-137.
37. Schwieters, C. D.; Clore, G. M. J. Magn. Reson. 2001, 152, 288-302.
38. Clore, G. M.; Garrett, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9008-9012.
39. Tjandra, N.; Marquardt, J. L.; Clore, G. M. J. Magn. Reson. 2000, 142, 393-396.
40. Hu, J.-S.; Bax, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6360-6368.
41. Schwieters, C. D.; Kuszewski, J.; Tjandra, N.; Clore, G. M. J. Magn. Reson. 2003, 160, 66-74.
42. Schwieters, C. D.; Clore, G. M. J. Magn. Reson. 2001, 139, 239-244.
43. Zwecketetter, M.; Bax, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3791-3792.
44. Berardi, R.; Fava, C.; Zannoni, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 236, 462-468.
45. Karplus, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2870-2871.
46. Sass, J.; Cordier, F.; Hoffman, A.; Rogowski, M.; Cousin, A.; Omichinski, J. G.; Löwen, H.; Grzesiek, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2047-2055.
47. Karplus, P. A. Protein Sci. 1996, 5, 1406-1420.
48. 2(jump) order parameters are essentially unaffected by the NOE restraints list employed.
49. 3J coupling measurements.12
50. Nilges, M.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Brünger, A. T.; Clore, G. M. Protein Eng. 1988, 2, 27-38.
51. Clore, G. M.; Kuszewski, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2866-2867.
52. Lipsitz, R. S.; Sharma, Y.; Brooks, B. R.; Tjandra, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10261-10266.
53. Kuszewski, J.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Clore, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2337-2338.
54. The covalent geometry restraints ensure that deviations from tetrahedral geometry about the Cα atom are extremely small in accordance with recent experimental results that indicate that the average angular deviations of the Cα-Ha vectors from their idealized covalent geometry are less than 1°.11
55. dip(work) refers to the dipolar coupling R-factors for the working set of dipolar couplings; that is, those dipolar couplings that are included in the target function employed for refinement.
56. e = 1 to 2 to be statistically significant when the decrease in the mean Rdip values (averaged over 100 calculated ensembles) is greater than the sum of their standard deviations.
57. Lipari G.; Szabo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4559-4570.
58. 2(jump) is strictly a calculated quantity derived from the N-H vector orientations in the structure ensembles. This term should not be confused with the generalized order parameter S for small isotropic internal motions which is the order parameter that linearly scales the magnitude of the dipolar couplings.
59. Laskowski, R. A.; MacArthur, M. W.; Moss, D. S.; Thornton, J. M. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 283-291.
60. Fushman, D.; Tjandra, N.; Cowburn, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8577-8522.