A polynomial-time algorithm for de novo protein backbone structure determination from nuclear magnetic resonance data

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1267-1288

  Wang, Lincong ^a   Mettu, Ramgopal R ^b   Donald, Bruce Randall ^c,d  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Massachusetts   (United States)

^c Duke University   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Computational molecular biology; NP completeness; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance; Protein structure; Residual dipolar couplings; Structural biology

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE QUALITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS; TIME PERCEPTION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 33846263054     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.1267     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andrec, M., Du, P., and Levy, R.M. 2001. Protein backbone structure determination using only residual dipolar couplings from one ordering medium. J. Biomol. NMR 21, 335-347.
2. Bailey-Kellogg, C., Widge, A., Kelley, J.J., et al. 2000a. The NOESY jigsaw: automated protein secondary structure and main-chain assignment from sparse, unassigned NMR data. J. Comput. Biol. 7, 537-558.
3. Bailey-Kellogg, C., Widge, A., Kelley, III, J.J., et al. 2000b. The NOESY jigsaw: automated protein secondary structure and main-chain assignment from sparse, unassigned NMR data. 4th Ann. Int. Conf. Comput. Mol. Biol. 33-44.
4. Basu, S., Pollack, R., and Roy, M.-F. 2003. Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York.
5. Berger, B., Kleinberg, J., and Leighton, F.T. 1999. Reconstructing a three-dimensional model with arbitrary errors. J. ACM 46, 212-235.
6. Böhringer, K.-F., Donald, B.R., and MacDonald, N. 1996. Upper and lower bounds for programmable vector fields with applications to MEMS and vibratory plate parts feeders. Proc. Int. Workshop Algorithmic Found. Robot. (WAFR).
7. Brown, R.G., and Donald, B.R. 2000. Mobile robot self-localization without explicit landmarks. Algorithmica 26, 515-559.
8. Brünger, A.T. 1993. XPLOR: A system for X-ray crystallography and NMR. Yale University Press, New Haven.
9. Canny, J. 1987. A new algebraic method for robot motion planning and real geometry. Proc. 28th IEEE Conf. Found. Comput. Sci. 39-48.
10. Canny, J. 1993. Improved algorithms for sign determination and existential quantifier elimination. Comput. J. 36, 409-418.
11. Canny, J., and Donald, B.R. 1988. Simplified Voronoi diagrams. Discrete Comput. Geom. 3, 219-236.
12. Canny, J., Donald, B.R., and Ressler, G. 1992. A rational rotation method for robust geometric algorithms. Proc. 8th ACM Symp. Comput. Geom. 251-260.
13. Cavanagh, J., Fairbrother, W.J., Palmer, III, A.G., et al. 1995. Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Practice. Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Clore, G.M. 2000. Accurate and rapid docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of intermolecular nuclear Overhauser enhancement data and dipolar couplings by rigid body minimization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9021-9025.
15. Collins, G.E. 1975. Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 33, 515-532.
16. Cordier, F., Rogowski, M., Grzesiek, S., et al. 1999. Observation of through-hydrogen-bond 2hJHC′ in a perdeuterated protein. J. Magnet. Reson. 40, 510-512.
17. Crippen, G. 1991. Chemical distance geometry: current realization and future projection. J. Math. Chem. 6, 307-324.
18. Crippen, G.M., and Havel, T.F. 1988. Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformations. Wiley, New York, del Rio-Portílla, F., Blechta, V., and Freeman, R. 1994. Measurement of poorly-resolved splittings by J-doubling in the frequency domain. J. Magnet. Reson. 111a, 132-135.
19. Delaglio, F., Kontaxis, G., and Bax, A. 2000. Protein structure determination using molecular fragment replacement and NMR dipolar couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 2142-2143.
20. Donald, B.R. 1990. The complexity of planar compliant motion planning with uncertainty. Algorithmica 5, 353-382.
21. Donald, B.R. 1992. Robot motion planning. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 8.
22. Donald, B.R. 1993. Computational robotics: manipulation, planning, and control. Algorithmica 10, 91-101.
23. Donald, B.R., Kapur, D., and Mundy, J.L. 1992. Symbolic and Numerical Computation for Artificial Intelligence. Academic Press, Boston.
24. Donald, B.R., and Xavier, P. 1995a. Provably good approximation algorithms for optimal kinodynamic planning for Cartesian robots and open chain manipulators. Algorithmica 14, 443-479.
25. Donald, B.R., and Xavier, P. 1995b Provably good approximation algorithms for optimal kinodynamic planning: robots with decoupled dynamics bounds. Algorithmica 14, 480-530.
26. Dong, Q., and Wu, Z. 2002. A linear-time algorithm for solving the molecular distance geometry problem with exact inter-atomic distances. J. Global Optim. 22, 365-375.
27. Erdmann, M.A. 2004. Protein similarity from knot theory and geometric convolution. Proc. 8th Annu. Int. Conf. Comput. Mol. Biol 195-204.
28. Erdmann, M.A., and Lozano-Perez, T. 1987. On multiple moving objects. Algorithmica 2, 477-521.
29. Fowler, A.C., Tian, F., Al-Hashimi, H.M., et al. 2000. Rapid determination of protein folds using residual dipolar couplings. J. Mol. Biol. 304, 447-460.
30. 1H-δ1 methyl) isoleucine into proteins for multidimensional NMR studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7599-7600.
31. Giesen, A.W., Homans, S.W., and Brown, J.M. 2003. Determination of protein global folds using backbone residual dipolar coupling and long-range NOE restraints. J. Biomol. NMR 25, 63-71.
32. Grigor'ev, D.Y. 1988. Complexity of deciding Tarski algebra. J. Symbolic Comput. 5, 65-108.
33. Grigor'ev, D.Y., and Vorobjov, Jr., N.N. 1988. Solving systems of polynomial inequalities in sub-exponential time. J. Symbolic Comput. 5, 65-108.
34. Güntert, P., Mumenthaler, C., and Wüthrich, K. 1997. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 283-298.
35. Heintz, J., Roy, M.-F, and Solemò, P. 1990. Sur la complexité du principe de Tarski-Seidenberg. Bull. Soc. Math France 118, 101-126.
36. Hendrickson, B. 1992. Conditions for unique graph realizations. SIAM J. Comput. 21, 65-84.
37. Hendrickson, B. 1995. The molecule problem: exploiting structures in global optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 5, 835-857.
38. Herrmann, T., Güntert, P., and Wüthrich, K. 2002. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 209-227.
39. Hooft, R.W.W, Sander, C., and Vriend, G. 1996. The PDBFINDER database: a summary of PDB, DSSP and HSSP information with added value. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12, 525-529.
40. Huang, Y.J., Swapna, G.V., Rajan, P.K., et al. 2003. Solution NMR structure of ribosome-binding factor a (RbfA), a cold-shock adaptation protein from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 327, 521-536.
41. Hus, J.C., Marion, D., and Blackledge, M. 2001. Determination of protein backbone using only residual dipolar couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 1541-1542.
42. Juszewski, K., Schwieters, C.D.S., Garrett, D.S., et al. 2004. Completely automated, highly error-tolerant macromolecular structure determination from multidimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectra and chemical shift assignments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 6258-6273.
43. Losonczi, J.A., Andrec, M., Fischer, M.W., et al. 1999. Order matrix analysis of residual dipolar couplings using singular value decomposition. J. Magnet. Resort. 138, 334-342.
44. Marin, A., Malliavin, T.E., Nicolas, P., et al. 2004. From NMR chemical shifts to amino acid types: investigation of the predictive power carried by nuclei. J. Biomol, NMR 30, 47-60.
45. Nilges, M., Macias, M., Odonoghue, S., et al. 1997. Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: the refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from β-spectrin. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 408-422.
46. Ponce, J., and Kriegman, D.J. 1992. Elimination theory and computer vision: recognition and positioning of 3D objects from range, intensity, or contours. In Donald, B.R., Kapur, D., and Mundy, J.L., eds. Symbolic and Numerical Computation for Artificial Intelligence. Academic Press, Boston.
47. Prestegard, J.H., Bougault, C.M., and Kishore, A.I. 2004. Residual dipolar couplings in structure determination of biomolecules. Chem. Rev. 104, 3519-3540.
48. Renegar, J. 1992. On the computational complexity and geometry of the first-order theory of reals. J. Symbolic Comput. 13, 255-352.
49. Rieping, W., Habeck, M., and Nilges, M. 2005. Inferential structure determination. Science 209, 303-306.
50. Rohl, C.A., and Baker, D. 2002. De novo determination of protein backbone structure from residual dipolar couplings using Rosetta. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 2723-2729.
51. Saupe, A. 1968. Recent results in the field of liquid crystals. Angew. Chem. 7, 97-112.
52. Saxe, J.B. 1979. Embeddability of weighted graphs in k-space is strongly NP-hard. Proc. 17th Allerton Conf. Comm. Control Comput. 480-489.
53. Skrynnikov, N.R., and Kay, L.E. 2000. Assessment of molecular structure using frame-independent orientational restraints derived from residual dipolar couplings. J. Biomol. NMR 18, 239-252.
54. Tarski, A. 1951. A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry. University of California Press, Berkeley.
55. Tian, F., Valafar, H., and Prestegard, J.H. 2001. A dipolar coupling based strategy for simultaneous resonance assignment and structure determination of protein backbones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 11791-11796.
56. Tjandra, N., and Bax, A. 1997. Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278, 1111-1114.
57. Tolman, J.R., Flanagan, J.M., Kennedy, M.A., et al. 1995. Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: information for structure determination in solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9279-9283.
58. Vijay-Kumar, S., Bugg, C.E., and Cook, W.J. 1987. Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 194, 531-544.
59. Wang, L., and Donald, B.R. 2004a. Analysis of a systematic search-based algorithm for determining protein backbone structure from a minimal number of residual dipolar couplings. IEEE Comput. Sys. Bioinform. Conf. 319-330.
60. Wang, L., and Donald, B.R. 2004b. Exact solutions for internuclear vectors and backbone dihedral angles from nh residual dipolar couplings in two media, and their application in a systematic search algorithm for determining protein backbone structure. J. Biomol. NMR 29, 223-242.
61. Wang, Y.X., Jacob, J., Cordier, F., et al. 1999. Measurement of ShJNC′ connectivities across hydrogen bonds in a 30-kDa protein. J. Biomol. NMR 14, 181-184.
62. Wedemeyer, W.J., Rohl, C.A., and Scheraga, H.A. 2002. Exact solutions for chemical bond orientations from residual dipolar couplings. J. Biomol. NMR 22, 137-151.
63. Wishart, D.S., and Sykes, B.D. 1994. The 13C chemical shift index: a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical shift data. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 171-180.
64. Wishart, D.S., Sykes, B.D., and Richards, F.M. 1991. Relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift and protein secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 222, 311-333.
65. Wishart, D.S., Sykes, B.D., and Richards, F.M. 1992. The 13C chemical shift index: A fast and simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical shift data. Biochemistry 31, 1647-1651.