Clustering algorithms for identifying core atom sets and for assessing the precision of protein structure ensembles

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 673-686

  Snyder, David A ^a   Montelione, Gaetano T ^a,b,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomolecular NMR; Hierarchical clustering; RMSD stable domains; Superimposition

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ATOMIC PARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CALCULATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 18844415920     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20402     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Taylor JR. An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books; 1982. 270 p.
2. García, A.E., Krumhansl, J.A., Frauenfelder, H. Variations on a theme by Debye and Waller: from simple crystals to proteins. Proteins 1997;29:153-160.
3. Wüthrich K. NMR - this other method for protein and nucleic acid structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D 1995;51:249-270.
4. Kelley LA, Gardner SP, Sutcliffe MJ. An automated approach for defining core atoms and domains in an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures. Protein Eng 1997;10:737-741.
5. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
6. Patthy L. Protein evolution by exon-shuffling. Austin, Texas: R.G. Landes Company; 1995. 136 p.
7. Dietmann S, Park J, Notredame C, Heger A, Lappe M, Holm L. A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: Dali Domain Dictionary version 3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:55-57.
8. Spronk CAEM, Nabuurs SB, Bonvin AMJJ, Krieger E, Vuister GW, Vriend G. The precision NMR structure ensembles revisited. J Biomol NMR 2003;25:225-234.
9. Kelley LA, Gardner SP, Sutcliffe MJ. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally-related subfamilies. Protein Eng 1996;9:1063-1065.
10. Hyberts SG, Goldberg MS, Havel TF, Wagner G. The solution structure of eglin c based on measurements of many NOEs and coupling constants and its comparison with X-ray structures. Protein Sci 1992;1:736-751.
11. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
12. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1995. 887 p.
13. Bock, H-H. Probability models and hypothesis testing in partitioning cluster analysis. In: Arabie P, Hubert LJ, De Soete G, editors. Clustering and classification. New Jersey: World Scientific; 1996. p 377-453.
14. Gordon AD. Hierarchical classification. In: Arabie P, Hubert LJ, De Soete G, editor. Clustering and classification. New Jersey: World Scientific; 1996. p 65-121.
15. Milligan GW. Clustering validation: results and implications for applied analysis. In: Arabie P, Hubert LJ, De Soete G, editors. Clustering and classification. New Jersey: World Scientific; 1996. p 341-375.
16. Zelen M, Severo NC. Probability functions. In: Abramowitz M, Stegun IA, editors. Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.; 1965. p 925-995.
17. Mojena R, Wishart D. Stopping rules for Ward's clustering method. In: Barritt MM, Wishart D, editors. COMPSTAT 1980: Proceedings in computational statistics. Vienna: Physica-Verlag; 1980. p 426-432.
18. Westfall PH, Johnson WO, Utts JM. A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika 1997;84:419-427.
19. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr Sec A 1976;32:922-923.
20. Kabsch W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr Sec A 1978;34:827-828.
21. Tejero R, Montelione GT. PDBStat, Version 3.12. 1999.
22. Molmol, Version 2.6. Switzerland: Spectrospin AG.; 1998.
23. Brzustowski J. Qclust. 1997.
24. Williams T, Kelley C. Gnuplot, Version 3.5. 1993.
25. Excel. Microsoft Corporation, 1998.
26. Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (SISA). http://home.clara. net/sisa/; 2004
27. Institute of Phonetic Sciences (Universiteit van Amsterdam), Statistical Tests. http://fonsg3.let.uva.nl/Service/Statistics.html; 2004.
28. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
29. Gerstein M, Altman RB, Using a measure of structural variation to define a core for the globins. CABIOS 1995;11:633-644.
30. H domains of immunoglobin molecules. Protein Eng 1998;11:1015-1025.
31. Rossmann MG, Liljas A. Recognition of structural domains in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1974;85:177-181.
32. Kelley LA, Sutcliffe MJ. OLDERADO: on-line database of ensemble representatives and domains. Protein Sci 1997;6:2628-2630.
33. Prestegard JH. New techniques in structural NMR-anisotropic interactions. Nat Struct Biol NMR Supplement 1998;5:517-522.
34. a coarse graining. J Mol Graph Model 2004;22:183-193.