Solution NMR in structural genomics

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 611-617

  Yee, Adelinda ^a   Gutmanas, Aleksandras ^a   Arrowsmith, Cheryl H ^a,b  

^a PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AUTOMATION; GENOMICS; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS;

ANIMALS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEINS; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 33749044819     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.08.002     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Yee A., Chang X., Pineda-Lucena A., Wu B., Semesi A., Le B., Ramelot T., Lee G.M., Bhattacharyya S., Gutierrez P., et al. An NMR approach to structural proteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 (2002) 1825-1830
2. Acton T.B., Gunsalus K.C., Xiao R., Ma L.C., Aramini J., Baran M.C., Chiang Y.W., Climent T., Cooper B., Denissova N.G., et al. Robotic cloning and protein production platform of the northeast structural genomics consortium. Methods Enzymol 394 (2005) 210-243
3. Tyler R.C., Aceti D.J., Bingman C.A., Cornilescu C.C., Fox B.G., Frederick R.O., Jeon W.B., Lee M.S., Newman C.S., Peterson F.C., et al. Comparison of cell-based and cell-free protocols for producing target proteins from the Arabidopsis thaliana genome for structural studies. Proteins 59 (2005) 633-643. Good comparison of methodologies, in terms of protein production and success rates for NMR versus X-ray crystallography.
4. Peti W., Etezady-Esfarjani T., Herrmann T., Klock H.E., Lesley S.A., and Wüthrich K. NMR for structural proteomics of Thermotoga maritima: screening and structure determination. J Struct Funct Genomics 5 (2004) 205-215
5. Kigawa T., Yabuki T., Matsuda N., Matsuda T., Nakajima R., Tanaka A., and Yokoyama S. Preparation of Escherichia coli cell extract for highly productive cell-free protein expression. J Struct Funct Genomics 5 (2004) 63-68. Detailed description of the protocol and solutions used in the cell-free preparation. Particularly useful are the authors' comments and annotations on different commercial suppliers of the materials used.
6. Endo Y., and Sawasaki T. High-throughput, genome-scale protein production method based on the wheat germ cell-free expression system. Biotechnol Adv 21 (2003) 695-713
7. Studier F.W. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif 41 (2005) 207-234. Explanation of the media components and their effects on growth and protein induction are very helpful for implementation in the laboratory.
8. Torizawa T., Shimizu M., Taoka M., Miyano H., and Kainosho M. Efficient production of isotopically labeled proteins by cell-free synthesis: a practical protocol. J Biomol NMR 30 (2004) 311-325
9. Vinarov D.A., and Markley J.L. High-throughput automated platform for nuclear magnetic resonance-based structural proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 2 (2005) 49-55
10. Woestenenk E.A., Hammarström M., van den Berg S., Härd T., and Berglund H. His tag effect on solubility of human proteins produced in Escherichia coli: a comparison between four expression vectors. J Struct Funct Genomics 5 (2004) 217-229
11. Hammarström M., Hellgren N., van den Berg S., Berglund H., and Härd T. Rapid screening for improved solubility of small human proteins produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci 11 (2002) 313-321
12. Hunt I. From gene to protein: a review of new and enabling technologies for multi-parallel protein expression. Protein Expr Purif 40 (2005) 1-22
13. Card P.B., and Gardner K.H. Identification and optimization of protein domains for NMR studies. Methods Enzymol 394 (2005) 3-16. Comprehensive review of strategies for domain mapping.
14. Ishibashi M., Tsumoto K., Tokunaga M., Ejima D., Kita Y., and Arakawa T. Is arginine a protein-denaturant?. Protein Expr Purif 42 (2005) 1-6
15. Chae Y.K., Im H., Zhao Q., Doelling J.H., Vierstra R.D., and Markley J.L. Prevention of aggregation after refolding by balanced stabilization-destabilization: production of the Arabidopsis thaliana protein APG8a (At4g21980) for NMR structure determination. Protein Expr Purif 34 (2004) 280-283
16. Atreya H.S., and Szyperski T. Rapid NMR data collection. Methods Enzymol 394 (2005) 78-108. Comprehensive review of newer methods in fast NMR data collection.
17. Kim S., and Szyperski T. GFT NMR, a new approach to rapidly obtain precise high-dimensional NMR spectral information. J Am Chem Soc 125 (2003) 1385-1393
18. Kupče E., and Freeman R. Fast multi-dimensional NMR of proteins. J Biomol NMR 25 (2003) 349-354
19. Hoch J.C., and Stern A.S. NMR Data Processing (1996), Wiley-Liss, Inc, New York
20. Orekhov V.Y., Ibraghimov I., and Billeter M. Optimizing resolution in multidimensional NMR by three-way decomposition. J Biomol NMR 27 (2003) 165-173
21. Szyperski T., and Atreya H.S. Principles and applications of GFT projection NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Chem 44 (2006) 51-60
22. Moseley H.N., Riaz N., Aramini J.M., Szyperski T., and Montelione G.T. A generalized approach to automated NMR peak list editing: application to reduced dimensionality triple resonance spectra. J Magn Reson 170 (2004) 263-277
23. Shen Y., Atreya H.S., Liu G., and Szyperski T. G-matrix Fourier transform NOESY-based protocol for high-quality protein structure determination. J Am Chem Soc 127 (2005) 9085-9099. First application of GFT to NOESY spectra, leading to a PDB structure.
24. Kupče E., and Freeman R. Hyperdimensional NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 128 (2006) 6020-6021
25. Venters R.A., Coggins B.E., Kojetin D., Cavanagh J., and Zhou P. (4,2)D Projection-reconstruction experiments for protein backbone assignment: application to human carbonic anhydrase II and calbindin D(28K). J Am Chem Soc 127 (2005) 8785-8795
26. Hiller S., Fiorito F., Wüthrich K., and Wider G. Automated projection spectroscopy (APSY). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 10876-10881
27. Eghbalnia H.R., Bahrami A., Tonelli M., Hallenga K., and Markley J.L. High-resolution iterative frequency identification for NMR as a general strategy for multidimensional data collection. J Am Chem Soc 127 (2005) 12528-12536
28. Rovnyak D., Frueh D.P., Sastry M., Sun Z.Y., Stern A.S., Hoch J.C., and Wagner G. Accelerated acquisition of high resolution triple-resonance spectra using non-uniform sampling and maximum entropy reconstruction. J Magn Reson 170 (2004) 15-21
29. Frueh D.P., Sun Z.Y., Vosburg D.A., Walsh C.T., Hoch J.C., and Wagner G. Non-uniformly sampled double-TROSY HNCANH experiments for NMR sequential assignments of large proteins. J Am Chem Soc 128 (2006) 5757-5763
30. Sun Z.Y., Hyberts S.G., Rovnyak D., Park S., Stern A.S., Hoch J.C., and Wagner G. High-resolution aliphatic side-chain assignments in 3D HCCONH experiments with joint H-C evolution and non-uniform sampling. J Biomol NMR 32 (2005) 55-60. Combination of GFT and MaxEnt methods applied on a small protein.
31. 15N-NOESY-HSQC. J Biomol NMR 24 (2002) 191-201
32. Gutmanas A., Tu L., Orekhov V.Y., and Billeter M. Accurate relaxation parameters for large proteins. J Magn Reson 167 (2004) 107-113
33. Luan T., Jaravine V., Yee A., Arrowsmith C.H., and Orekhov V.Y. Optimization of resolution and sensitivity of 4D NOESY using multi-dimensional decomposition. J Biomol NMR 33 (2005) 1-14. A thorough evaluation of Multiway decomposition applied to a 4D NOESY spectrum. In particular, robustness with respect to calculation parameters is proven.
34. Güntert P. Automated NMR protein structure calculation. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 43 (2003) 105-125. A comprehensive and well-balanced review of different assignment strategies and structure calculation methods and available software.
35. Liu G., Shen Y., Atreya H.S., Parish D., Shao Y., Sukumaran D.K., Xiao R., Yee A., Lemak A., Bhattacharya A., et al. NMR data collection and analysis protocol for high-throughput protein structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 10487-10492
36. Brünger A.T., Adams P.D., Clore G.M., DeLano W.L., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Jiang J.S., Kuszewski J., Nilges M., Pannu N.S., et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 54 (1998) 905-921
37. Güntert P. Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol Biol 278 (2004) 353-378
38. Zheng D., Huang Y.J., Moseley H.N., Xiao R., Aramini J., Swapna G.V., and Montelione G.T. Automated protein fold determination using a minimal NMR constraint strategy. Protein Sci 12 (2003) 1232-1246
39. Habeck M., Rieping W., Linge J.P., and Nilges M. NOE assignment with ARIA 2.0: 0: the nuts and bolts. Methods Mol Biol 278 (2004) 379-402
40. Linge J.P., O'Donoghue S.I., and Nilges M. Automated assignment of ambiguous nuclear Overhauser effects with ARIA. Methods Enzymol 339 (2001) 71-90
41. Herrmann T., Güntert P., and Wüthrich K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J Mol Biol 319 (2002) 209-227
42. Herrmann T., Güntert P., and Wüthrich K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE-identification in the NOESY spectra using the new software ATNOS. J Biomol NMR 24 (2002) 171-189
43. Etezady-Esfarjani T., Herrmann T., Peti W., Klock H.E., Lesley S.A., and Wüthrich K. NMR structure determination of the hypothetical protein TM1290 from Thermotoga maritima using automated NOESY analysis. J Biomol NMR 29 (2004) 403-406
44. Kuszewski J., Schwieters C.D., Garrett D.S., Byrd R.A., Tjandra N., and Clore G.M. Completely automated, highly error-tolerant macromolecular structure determination from multidimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectra and chemical shift assignments. J Am Chem Soc 126 (2004) 6258-6273
45. Grishaev A., and Llinas M. BACUS: a Bayesian protocol for the identification of protein NOESY spectra via unassigned spin systems. J Biomol NMR 28 (2004) 1-10
46. Grishaev A., and Llinas M. Protein structure elucidation from minimal NMR data: the CLOUDS approach. Methods Enzymol 394 (2005) 261-295
47. Grishaev A., Steren C.A., Wu B., Pineda-Lucena A., Arrowsmith C., and Llinas M. ABACUS, a direct method for protein NMR structure computation via assembly of fragments. Proteins 61 (2005) 36-43
48. Page R., Peti W., Wilson I.A., Stevens R.C., and Wüthrich K. NMR screening and crystal quality of bacterially expressed prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins in a structural genomics pipeline. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 1901-1905. This study demonstrates the use of NMR as a screening tool to predict which proteins can generate crystals that diffract to high resolution.
49. Yee A.A., Savchenko A., Ignachenko A., Lukin J., Xu X., Skarina T., Evdokimova E., Liu C.S., Semesi A., Guido V., et al. NMR and X-ray crystallography, complementary tools in structural proteomics of small proteins. J Am Chem Soc 127 (2005) 16512-16517. A comparison of 263 proteins targeted for both NMR analysis and X-ray crystallography. The authors found no correlation between those proteins that were 'solvable' by NMR versus those that crystallized. The combination of both methods yielded a greater number of structures in total.
50. Snyder D.A., Chen Y., Denissova N.G., Acton T., Aramini J.M., Ciano M., Karlin R., Liu J., Manor P., Rajan P.A., et al. Comparisons of NMR spectral quality and success in crystallization demonstrate that NMR and X-ray crystallography are complementary methods for small protein structure determination. J Am Chem Soc 127 (2005) 16505-16511. A comparison of 159 proteins targeted for both NMR analysis and X-ray crystallography. The authors found no correlation between those proteins that yielded NMR structures versus those that could be solved by X-ray crystallography. The combination of both methods yielded a greater number of structures in total.
51. Nabuurs S.B., Spronk C.A., Vuister G.W., and Vriend G. Traditional biomolecular structure determination by NMR spectroscopy allows for major errors. PLoS Comput Biol 2 (2006) e9
52. Nabuurs S.B., Krieger E., Spronk C.A., Nederveen A.J., Vriend G., and Vuister G.W. Definition of a new information-based per-residue quality parameter. J Biomol NMR 33 (2005) 123-134
53. Snyder D.A., Bhattacharya A., Huang Y.J., and Montelione G.T. Assessing precision and accuracy of protein structures derived from NMR data. Proteins 59 (2005) 655-661
54. Snyder D.A., and Montelione G.T. Clustering algorithms for identifying core atom sets and for assessing the precision of protein structure ensembles. Proteins 59 (2005) 673-686
55. Prestegard J.H., Mayer K.L., Valafar H., and Benison G.C. Determination of protein backbone structures from residual dipolar couplings. Methods Enzymol 394 (2005) 175-209
56. Bax A., and Grishaev A. Weak alignment NMR: a hawk-eyed view of biomolecular structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15 (2005) 563-570
57. Linge J.P., Williams M.A., Spronk C.A., Bonvin A.M., and Nilges M. Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent. Proteins 50 (2003) 496-506
58. 13C labeling. Biochemistry 28 (1989) 7510-7516
59. Goddard TD, Kneller DG: SPARKY 3. University of Califonia, San Francisco.
60. Delaglio F., Grzesiek S., Vuister G.W., Zhu G., Pfeifer J., and Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6 (1995) 277-293
61. Bhattacharya A, Montelione GT: Protein structure validation suite - PSVS 1.2. Rutgers University, New Jersey.