Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics

Nature

Volumn 433, Issue 7022, 2005, Pages 128-132

  Lindorff Larsen, Kresten ^a,b   Best, Robert B ^a,c   DePristo, Mark A ^a,d   Dobson, Christopher M ^a   Vendruscolo, Michele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

ATOMIC LEVEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATIONS; PROTEIN STRUCTURES;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; LIQUID; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLUTIONS; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 12744263121     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature03199     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Frauenfelder, H., Sligar, S. G. & Wolynes, P. G. The energy landscapes and motions on proteins. Science 254, 1598-1603 (1991).
2. Rasmussen, B. F., Stock, A. M., Ringe, D. & Petsko, G. A. Crystalline ribonuclease A loses function below the dynamical transition at 220 K. Nature 357, 423-424 (1992).
3. Karplus, M. & McCammon, J. A. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nature Struct. Biol. 9, 646-652 (2002).
4. Eisenmesser, E. Z., Bosco, D. A., Akke, M. & Kern, D. Enzyme dynamics during catalysis. Science 295, 1520-1523 (2002).
5. Wong, C. F. & McCammon, J. A. Protein flexibility and computer-aided drug design. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 43, 31-45 (2003).
6. Benkovic, S. J. & Hammes-Schiffer, S. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 301, 1196-1202 (2003).
7. Kay, L. E. Protein dynamics from NMR. Nature Struct. Biol. 5, 513-517 (1998).
8. Best, R. B. & Vendruscolo, M. Determination of ensembles of structures consistent with NMR order parameters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 8090-8091 (2004).
9. 15N NMR relaxation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 12562-12566 (1995).
10. Tjandra, N. & Bax, A. Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278, 1111-1114 (1997).
11. Cornilescu, G., Marquardt, J. L., Ottiger, M. & Bax, A. Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 6836-6837 (1998).
12. Ottiger, M. & Bax, A. How tetrahedral are methyl groups in proteins? A liquid crystal NMR study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 4690-4695 (1999).
13. 13C NMR relaxation techniques for the study of protein methyl group dynamics in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 2891-2902 (1999).
14. Peti, W., Meiler, J., Brüschweiler, R. & Griesinger, C. Model-free analysis of protein backbone motion from residual dipolar couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 5822-5833 (2002).
15. CN couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 8959-8966 (2003).
16. Clore, G. M. & Schwieters, C. D. How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 2923-2938 (2004).
17. Kitao, A. & Wagner, G. A space-time structure determination of human CD2 reveals the CD58-binding mode. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2064-2068 (2000).
18. Scheck, R. M., Torda, A. E., Kemmink, J. & van Gunsteren, W. F. in Computational Aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (eds Hoch, J. C., Redfield, C. & Poulsen, F. M.) 209-217 (Plenum, New York, 1991).
19. Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Rullmann, J. A. C., Lamerichs, R. M. J. N., Boelens, R. & Kaptein, R. 'Ensemble' iterative relaxation matrix approach: A new NMR refinement protocol applied to the solution structure of crambin. Proteins 15, 385-400 (1993).
20. Choy, W. Y. & Forman-Kay, J. D. Calculation of ensembles of structures representing the unfolded state of an SH3 domain. J. Mol. Biol. 308, 1011-1032 (2001).
21. Vijay-Kumar, S., Bugg, C. E. & Cook, W. J. Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 194, 531-544 (1987).
22. Mierke, D. F., Scheck, R. M. & Kessler, H. Coupling constants as restraints in ensemble driven dynamics. Biopolymers 34, 559-563 (1994).
23. Stillinger, F. H. & Stillinger, D. K. Computational study of transition dynamics in 55-atom clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 93, 6013-6024 (1990).
24. Zhou, Y., Vitkup, D. & Karplus, M. Native proteins are surface-molten solids: Application of the Lindemann criterion for the solid versus liquid state. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1371-1375 (1999).
25. DePristo, M. A., de Bakker, P. I. & Blundell, T. L. Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography. Structure 12, 831-838 (2004).
26. Hoch, J. C., Dobson, C. M. & Karplus, M. Vicinal coupling constants and protein dynamics. Biochemistry 24, 3831-3841 (1984).
27. Best, R. B., Clarke, J. & Karplus, M. The origin of protein sidechain order parameter distributions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 7734-7735 (2004).
28. Markley, J. L. et al. Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids. J. Mol. Biol. 280, 933-952 (1998).
29. Richards, F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: Total volume, group volume distribution and packing density. J. Mol. Biol. 82, 1-14 (1974).
30. Pontius, J., Richelle, J. & Wodak, S. J. Deviation from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structure. J. Mol. Biol. 264, 121-136 (1996).
31. Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E. & Serrano, L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 320, 369-387 (2002).
32. Buck, M. & Karplus, M. Internal and overall peptide group motion in proteins: Molecular dynamics simulations for lysozyme compared with results from X-ray and NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 9645-9658 (1999).
33. Vendruscolo, M., Paci, E., Dobson, C. M. & Karplus, M. Rare fluctuations of native proteins sampled by equilibrium hydrogen exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 15686-15687 (2003).
34. Lee, A. L. & Wand, A. J. Microscopic origins of entropy, heat capacity and the glass transition in proteins. Nature 411, 501-504 (2001).
35. Yang, D. & Kay, L. E. Contributions to conformational entropy arising from bond vector fluctuations measured from NMR-derived order parameters: Application to protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 263, 369-382 (1996).
36. Johnson, E. C., Lazar, G. A., Desjarlais, J. R. & Handel, T. M. Solution structure and dynamics of a designed hydrophobic core variant of ubiquitin. Struct. Fold. Des. 7, 967-976 (1999).
37. Benitez-Cardoza, C. G. et al. Exploring sequence/folding space: Folding studies on multiple hydrophobic core mutants of ubiquitin. Biochemistry 43, 5195-5203 (2004).
38. Lindorff-Larsen, K. et al. Determination of a broad structural ensemble representing the denatured state of the bovine acyl-coenzyme A binding protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3291-3299 (2004).
39. Korzhnev, D. M. et al. Low-populated folding intermediates of Fyn SH3 characterized by relaxation dispersion NMR. Nature 430, 586-590 (2004).
40. Vendruscolo, M., Paci, E., Dobson, C. M. & Karplus, M. Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature 409, 641-645 (2001).
41. Lindorff-Larsen, K., Paci, E., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. Transition states for protein folding have native topologies despite high structural variability. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 443-449 (2004).
42. Schwieters, C. D. & Clore, G. M. Reweighted atomic densities to represent ensembles of NMR structures. J. Biomol. NMR 23, 221-225 (2002).
43. Jorgensen, W. J., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926-935 (1983).
44. Brooks, B. R. et al. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4, 187-217 (1983).
45. Paci, E. & Karplus, M. Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: An analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 288, 441-459 (1999).
46. Fox, T. & Kollman, P. A. The application of different solvation and electrostatic models in molecular dynamics simulations of ubiquitin: How well is the X-ray structure 'maintained'? Proteins 25, 315-334 (1995).