Researching cognition and technology: How we learn across the lifespan

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 375-396

  Petrina, Stephen ^a   Feng, Franc ^a   Kim, Juyun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Distributed cognition; Learning theory; Lifelong learning; New media and technology; Technological literacy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

DISTRIBUTED COGNITION; LEARNING THEORY; LIFELONG LEARNING; NEW MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 51149092589     PISSN: 09577572     EISSN: 15731804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-007-9033-5     Document Type: Article

References (168)

1. Ahmed, S., & Wallace, K. (2004). Understanding the knowledge needs of novice designers in the aerospace industry. Design Studies, 25(2), 155-173.
2. Ardeldt, M. (2000). Intellectual versus wisdom-related knowledge. Educational Gerontology, 26(6), 771-789.
3. Baird, F., Moore, C. J., & Jagodzinski, A. P. (2000). An ethnographic study of engineering design teams at Rolls-Royce Aerospace. Design Studies, 21(4), 333-355.
4. Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2000). Putting ethnography to work: The case for a cognitive ethnography of design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 147-168.
5. Barab, S., & Kirshner, D. (2001). Guest editors' introduction: Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 5-15.
6. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
7. Barak, M. (2002). Learning good electronics ort coping with challenging tasks: The priorities of excellent students. Journal of Technology Education, 14(1), 20-27.
8. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballentine Books.
9. Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth in design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243-253.
10. Bers, M. U. (2001). Identity construction environments: Developing personal and moral values through design of a virtual city. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(4), 365-415.
11. Boshier, R., & Onn, C. M. (2000). Discursive constructions of web learning and education. Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 1-16.
12. Bosworth, K., Espelage, D., & DuBay, T. (1998). A computer-based violence intervention for young adolescents: A pilot study. Adolescence, 33(8), 785-885.
13. Bransford J. D., Brown A. L., Cocking R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington DC: National Research Council.
14. Braundy, M., O'Riley, P., & Petrina, S. with Dalley, S. & Paxton, A. (2000). Missing XX chromosomes or gender in/equity in design and technology education? The case of British Columbia. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(3), 54-92.
15. Brennan, K., Feng, F., Hall, L. & Petrina, S. (2007). On the complexity of technology and the technology of complexity. In B. Davis & D. Sumara (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth complexity science and educational research conference, 18-20 February, Vancouver, BC.
16. Brosnan, M. (1998). Technophobia. New York: Routledge.
17. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
18. Brown, C. A. (1991). What are little girls made of? A study of technology in the early years. Educational Studies, 17(1), 107-113.
19. Brunken, R. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53-61.
20. Bryson, M., & de Castell, S. (1996). Learning to make a difference: Gender, new technologies, and in/equity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(2), 119-135.
21. Bryson, M., Petrina, S., Braundy, M., & de Castell, S. (2003). "Conditions for Success?" Gender in technology-intensive courses in British Columbia secondary schools. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(2). 185-193.
22. Burnam, B., & Kafai, Y. (2001). Ethics and the computer: Children's development of moral reasoning about computer and internet use. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 111-127.
23. Carr, M. (2000). Technological affordance, social practice and learning narratives in an early childhood setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 61-79.
24. Chaiklin S., Lave J. (Eds.) (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Chatfield, C. (1996). The analysis of time series: An introduction. London: Chapman and Hall.
26. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Clark, A. (2003). Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Darr, A. (2000). Technical labour in an engineering boutique: Interpretive frameworks of sales and R&D engineers. Work, Employment and Society, 14(2), 205-222.
29. Darr, A. (2002). The technicization of sales work: An ethnographic study in the US electronics industry. Work, Employment and Society, 16(1), 47-65.
30. Darrah, C. (1996). Learning and work: An exploration in industrial ethnography. New York: Garland.
31. Davies, T., & Elmer, R. (2001). Learning in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(2), 163-180.
32. Davis, R. S., Ginns, I. S., & McRobbie, C. J. (2002). Elementary school students' understandings of technology concepts. Journal of Technology Education, 14(1), 35-50.
33. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Kieren, T. (1996). Cognition, co-emergence, curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 151-169.
35. Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2002). Constructivist discourses and the field of education: problems and possibilities. Educational Theory, 52(4), 409-428.
37. de Castell, & S., Bryson, M. (1998). Retooling play: Dystopia, dysphoria, and difference. In J. J. Cassell, Henry (Ed.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 232-261). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
38. DeMiranda, M. (2004). The grounding of a discipline: Cognition and instruction in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 61-77.
39. DeMiranda, M. A., & Folkestad, J. E. (2000). Linking cognitive science theory and technology education practice: A powerful connection not fully realized. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(4), 5-23.
40. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
41. Downey, G. L. (1998). The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge.
42. Druin, A. (Ed.) (1999). The design of children's technology. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
43. Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), 1-25.
44. Druin, A., Hendler, J. (Eds.) (2001). Robots for kids: Exploring new technologies for learning experiences. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
45. Druin, A., & Fast, C. (2002). The child as learner, critic, inventor, and technology design partner: An analysis of three years of Swedish student journals International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 189-213.
46. Eastman C., McCracken W. M., Newstetter W. (Eds.) (2001). Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. New York: Elsevier.
47. Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960-974.
48. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
49. Feng, F. (2003). Between immediacy and reification: Quotidian pedagogy, and the recovery of language and meaning in nature. (Ph.D. diss., University of British Columbia).
50. Field, J. (2002). Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Sterling: Trentham.
51. Field, J., & Leicester, M. (Eds.) (2000). Lifelong learning: Education across the lifespan. New York: Routledge.
52. Fleer, M. (1999). The science of Technology: Young children working technologically. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(3), 261-269.
53. Flor, N., & Hutchins, E. (1991). Analyzing distributed cognition in software teams. In J. Koenemann-Belliveau et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth annual workshop of empirical studies of programmers (pp. 36-59).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. Folkman, K., & Berge, Z. (2002). Learning from home: Implementing technical infrastructure for distributed learning via home PC within Telenor. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(1), 51-66.
55. Foster, P., & Wright, M. (2001). How children think and feel about design and technology: Two case studies. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 38(2), 40-64.
56. Freudenthal, D. (2001). The role of age, foreknowledge and complexity in learning to operate a complex device. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20(1), 23-35.
57. Funk, J. B., Baldacci, H. B., Pasold, T., & Baumgardner, J. (2004). Violence exposure in real-life, video games, television, movies and the internet: Is there desensitization? Journal of Adolescence, 27(1), 23-39.
58. Gardenfors, P., & Johansson, P. (2005). Cognition, education, and communication technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Ginns, I. S., Stein, S. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). Female students' learning in design and technology projects. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology, 3(3), 304-321.
60. Goldman-Segall, R. (1998). Points of viewing children's thinking: A digital ethnographer's journey. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Gorard, S., & Selwyn, N. (2005). Towards a le@rning society? The impact of technology on patterns of participation in lifelong learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(1), 71-89.
62. Gorayska, B., & Mey, J. L. (2002). Pragmatics of technology. International Journal of Cognition and Technology 1(1), 1-20.
63. Grifffiths, M. (1999). Violent video games and aggression: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4(2), 203-212.
64. Gunther, J., & Ehrlenspiel, K. (1999). Comparing designers from practice and designers with systematic design education. Design Studies, 20(4), 439-451.
65. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women. New York: Routledge.
66. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.) (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
67. Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The Potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1-36.
68. Hill, A. M., & Anning, A. (2001a). Comparisons and contrasts between elementary/primary 'school situated design' and 'workplace design' in Canada and England. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(2), 111-136.
69. Hill, A. M., & Anning, A. (2001b). Primary teachers' and students' understanding of school situated design in Canada and England. Research in Science Education, 31(1), 117-135.
70. Hmelo, C., Holton, D., & Kolodner, J. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.
71. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-196.
72. Hutchby I., Moran-Elles J. (Eds.) (2001). Children, culture and technology: The impacts of technologies in children's everyday lives. New York: Routledge.
73. Hultsch, D., Hertzog, C., Small, B., & Dixon, R. (1999). Use it or lose it: Lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging?. Psychology and Aging, 14(2), 245-263.
74. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Hutchins, E. (2000). Distributed cognition. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/Anthro179a/DistributedCognition.pdf.
76. Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555-1577.
77. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. New York: Routledge.
78. Jarvinen, E.-M. (1998). The Lego/Logo learning environment in technology education: An experiment in a Finnish context. Journal of Technology Education, 9(2), 47-59.
79. Jarvinen, E.-M., & Hiltunen, J. (2001). Automation technology in elementary education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(4), 51-76.
80. Jarvinen, E. -M., & Twyford, J. (2000). The influences of socio-cultural interaction upon children's thinking and actions in prescribed and open-ended problem solving situations. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 21-41.
81. Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1996). Understanding technology: The development of a concept. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 979-992.
82. Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1998). Factors that influence children's developing perceptions of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(3), 261-279.
83. Jenson, J., de Castell, S., & Bryson, M. (2003). 'Girl talk': Gender equity and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture. Women's Studies International Forum, 26(6), 561-573.
84. Joseph, D. (2004). The practice of design-based research: Uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 235-242.
85. Kafai, Y., Ching, C. C., & Marshall, S. (1997). Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Computers in Education, 29(2-3), 117-126.
86. Kafai, Y., Resnick, M. (Eds.) (1996). Constructionism in action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Kavakli, M., & Gero, J. (2002). The structure of concurrent actions: A case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies, 23(1), 25-40.
88. Khazanchi, D. (1994). Does pedagogy make a difference? An experimental study of unethical behavior in information systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 34(1), 54-58.
89. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., & Kelley, V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design and technology. London: Schools Examination and Assessment Authority.
90. Kirsh, D. (2001). A few thoughts on cognitive overload. Intellectica, 30, 19-51.
91. Kittleson, J., & Southerland, S. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267-293.
92. Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1-30.
93. Kokotovich, V., & Purcell, T. (2000). Mental synthesis and creativity in design. An experimental examination. Design Studies, 21(5), 437-449.
94. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow engineers and scientists through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95. Latour, B. (1996a). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(4), 228-245.
96. Latour, B. (1996b). Cogito Ergo Sumus! Or psychology swept inside out by the fresh air of the upper deck. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(1), 54-63.
97. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
98. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Lavonen, J., Meisalo, V., & Lattu, M. (2002). Collaborative problem solving in a control technology environment: A pilot study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(2), 139-160.
100. Legold, A., Ljoie, S., Logan, D., & Eggan, G. (1990). Applying cognitive task analysis and research methods to assessment. In N. Frederickson, R. Glaser. A. Legold & M. G. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 325-350). Hillesdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
101. Lemke, J. (2001). The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 17-26.
102. Lewis, T. (1997). Impact of technology on work and jobs in the printing industry. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(2), 7-28.
103. Maturana, F., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 42, 1-92.
104. McDonald C., Ginns I., McRobbie C., & Stein S. (2002). "It's just computers and electrical stuff": Changes in students' views of technology in a year 7 classroom. In H. Middleton, M. Pavlova, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Learning in Technology Education Conference (pp. 35-42). Queensland: Griffith University.
105. McRobbie, C., Stein, S., & Ginns, I. (2001). Exploring designerly thinking of students as novice designers. Research in Science Education, 31(1), 91-116.
106. Meszaros, P. (2004). The wired family: Living digitally in the postinformation age. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 377-390.
107. Middleton, H. (2005). Changing practice and changing lenses: The evolution of ways of researching technology education. In. M. de Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education: reviewing the past twenty years (pp. 53-64). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
108. Mioduser, D., & Kipperman, D. (2002). Evaluation/modification cycles in junior high students: Technological problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(2), 123-138.
109. Munro, A., & Rainbird, H. (2002). Job change and workplace learning in the public sector: The significance of new technology for unskilled work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 17(3), 224-235.
110. Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (2001). Realising the potential-and lost opportunities-for peer collaboration in a D and T setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 203-237.
111. Mutch, A. (1998). The impact of information technology on 'traditional occupations': The case of welding. New Technology, Work and Employment, 13(2), 140-149.
112. Nardi B. (Ed.) (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
113. Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
114. Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
115. Nowak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
116. Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development. (2000). Learning to bridge the digital divide. Paris: OECD.
117. Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism vs technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 21-30.
118. Papert, S. (1992). The children's machine. New York: Basic Books.
119. Pea, R. (1987). The aims of software criticism: Reply to Professor Papert. Educational Researcher, 16(4), 4-8.
120. Pea, R., & Kurland, D. M. (1987). On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. In R. Pea, K. Sheingold (Eds.), Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing (pp. 147-177). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
121. Pea, R., Kurland, D. M., & Hawkins, J. (1987). LOGO and the development of thinking skills. In R. Pea, K. Sheingold (Eds.), Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing (pp. 178-197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
122. Perkins, D. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14(7), 11-17.
123. Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12(3), 269-293.
124. Petrina, S. (1998). The politics of research in technology education: A critical analysis of the Journal of Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 27-57.
125. Petrina, S. (2000). The political ecology of design and technology education: An inquiry into methods. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 207-237.
126. Petrina, S. (2003). 'Two cultures' of technical courses and discourses: The case of computer-aided design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(1), 47-73.
127. Petrina, S., & Dalley, S. (2003). The politics of curriculum reform in Canada: The case of technology education in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(1), 117-144.
128. Petrina, S., & Feng, F. (2005). Primer for (learning in) cyberspace. Vancouver: Tech no-Printing Press.
129. Petrina, S., Bryson, M., Dobson, T., & Fels, L. (2004). Technology and emotion(s). UBC: Hampton Fund.
130. Petrina, S., Feng, F., & Kim, J. (2004). How we learn (about, through and for technology). Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.
131. Roden, C. (1997). Young children's problem-solving in design and technology: Towards a taxonomy of strategies. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 2(1), 14-19.
132. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101.
133. Poynton, T. (2005). Computer literacy across the lifespan: A review with implications for educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 861-872.
134. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. One the Horizon, October, 1-4.
135. Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, pt. II. One the Horizon, December, 1-45.
136. Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2003). The learning needs of older adults, Educational Gerontology, 29(2), 129-149.
137. Rennie, L., & Jarvis, T. (1995). Three approaches to measuring children's perceptions about technology. International Journal of Science Education, 17(6), 755-774.
138. Roth, W. -M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
139. Rowell, P. M. (2004). Developing technological stance: Children's learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 45-59.
140. Royer, J. M., Cisero, C. A., & Carlo, M. S. (1993). Techniques and procedures for assessing cognitive skills. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 201-243.
141. Ryan, E. B., Szechtman, B., & Bodkin, J. (1992). Attitudes toward younger and older adults learning to use computers. Journal of Gerontology, 47(1), 96-101.
142. Saloman, G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
143. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
144. Schallies, M., Wellensiek, A., & Lembens, A. (2002). The development of mature capabilities for understanding and valuing in technology through school project work: Individual and structural preconditions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(1), 41-58.
145. Selwyn, N., & Gorard, S. (2003). Exploring the 'new' imperatives of technology-based lifelong learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 8(1), 73-91.
146. Shaffer, D. W., & Clinton, K. A. (under review). Toolsforthought: Re-examining thinking in the digital age. Mind, Culture, and Activity.
147. Sherer, M. (1998). The effect of computerized simulation games on the moral development of junior and senior high-school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(2), 375-386.
148. Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams: An analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23(5), 473-496.
149. Sternberg, R., & Price, D. D. (Eds.) (2005). Intelligence and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
150. Sumara, D. J., & Davis, B. (1997). Enactivist theory and community learning. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 403-422.
151. Tapscott, D. (1999). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw Hill.
152. Taxen, G., Druin, A., Fast, C., & Kjellin, M. (2001). KidStory: A technology design partnership with children. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20(2), 119-125.
153. Tully, C. (2003). Growing up in technological worlds. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(6), 444-456.
154. Twyford, J., & Jarvinen, E.-M. (Fall, 2000). The Formation of children's technological concepts: A study of what it means to do technology from a child's perspective. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 32-48.
155. Upitis, R. (1998). From hackers to luddites, game players to game creators: Profiles of adolescent students using technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(3), 293-318.
156. van der Linden, D., Sonnentag, S., Frese, M., & van Dyck, C. (2001). Exploration strategies, performance, and error consequences when learning a complex computer task. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20(3), 189-198.
157. van Oostendorp, H. (Ed.) (2003). Cognition in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
158. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
159. Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artefacts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101.
160. Wahl, H., Oswald, F., & Zimprich, D. (1999). Everyday competence in visually impaired older adults: A case for person-environment perspectives. The Gerontologist, 39(2), 140-149.
161. Wajcman, J. (2002). Addressing technological change: The challenge to social theory. Current Sociology, 50(3), 347-363.
162. Weil, M. W., & Rosen, L. (1997). Technostress: Coping with technology @work @home @play. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
163. Welch, M. (1999). Analyzing the tacit strategies of novice designers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), 19-34.
164. Welch, M., Barlex, D., & Lim, H. S. (2000). The strategic thinking of novice designers: Discontinuity between theory and practice. Journal of Technology Studies, 25(2), 34-44.
165. White, J., & Weatherall, A. (2000). A grounded theory analysis of adults and information technology. Educational Gerontology, 26(4), 371-386.
166. Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
167. Winograd, T., & Flores, C. F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
168. Winograd, T., & Flores, C. F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.