Designing to Learn about Complex Systems

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 247-298

  Hmelo, Cindy E ^a   Holton, Douglas L ^b   Kolodner, Janet L ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034399627     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ADAM. (1994). ADAM interactive anatomy (CD-ROM for Macintosh). Glenwood, IL: Author.
2. Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3/4, 271-312.
3. Barrows, H. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.
4. Barrows, H., & Kelson, A. C. (1995). Problem-based learning in secondary education and the problem-based learning institute (Monograph 1). Springfield, IL: Problem- Based Learning Institute.
5. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
6. Chandrasekaran, B., & Josephson, J. (1996, August). Representing function as effect: Assigning functions to objects in context and out. Paper presented at the AAAI-96 Workshop on Modeling and Reasoning About Function, Portland, OR.
7. Chi, M., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
8. Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
9. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
10. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Feltovich, P., Coulsen, R., Spiro, R., & Adami, J. (1992). Conceptual understanding and stability and knowledge shield for fending off conceptual change. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
12. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulsen, R. L. (1993). Learning, teaching, and testing for complex conceptual understanding. In N. Frederiksen, R. Mislevy, & I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 181-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1231-1256.
14. Gertzman, A. D., & Kolodner, J. L. (1996). A case study of problem-based learning in a middle school science classroom: Lessons learned. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 96 (pp. 91-98). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
15. Goel, A., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989). Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1388-1394 ). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
16. Groothuis, S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Talmon, J. L. (1998). An analysis of the conceptual difficulties of the endocrinology domain and an empirical analysis of student and expert understanding of that domain. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 10, 207-216.
17. Hmelo, C. E. (1986). The visible chest [Unpublished computer software]. Stony Brook, NY.
18. Hmelo, C. E., & Ferrari, M. (1997). The problem-based learning tutorial: Cultivating higher order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 401-422.
19. Hmelo, C. E., & Guzdial, M. (1996). Of black and glass boxes: Scaffolding for learning and doing. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 96 (pp. 128-134). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
20. Hmelo, C., Narayanan, N. H., Hübscher, R., Newsletter, W., & Kolodner, J. L. (1996). A multiple-case-based approach to generative environments for learning. Vivek, 9, 2-18.
21. Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Scaffolding the development of an inquiry-based (science) classroom. To appear in Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2000.
22. Kafai, Y. (1996). Learning design by making games: Children's development of design strategies in the creation of a complex computational artifact. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 71-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
24. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52, 57-66.
25. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In A. S. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J. L. Kolodner, & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1998 (pp. 16-22). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
26. Kolodner, J. L., Hmelo, C., & Narayanan, H. (1996). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In D. Edelson & E. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 96 (pp. 189-195). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
27. Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 225-262.
28. Lehrer, R. ( 1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 103-126.
30. Linn, M. C., & Muilenberg, L. (1996). Creating lifelong science learners: What models form a firm foundation. Educational Researcher, 25, 18-24.
31. MacAuley, D. (1994). The way things work (CD-ROM, Version 1.0 for Macintosh). New York: Dorling.
32. Murayama, I. (1994). Role of agency in causal understanding of natural phenomena. Human Development, 37, 198-206.
33. Penner, D. E., Giles, N., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 125-143.
34. Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429-450.
35. Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Resnick, M. (1996). New paradigms for computing, new paradigms for thinking. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 255-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79, 475-502.
38. Roth, W.-M. (1996). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 129-166.
39. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
40. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
41. Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859-882.
43. SoftKey Multimedia. (1995). BodyWorks [CD-ROM]. Cambridge, MA: Author.
44. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3-19.