Exploring designerly thinking of students as novice designers

Research in Science Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 91-116

  McRobbie, Campbell J ^a   Stein, Sarah J ^b   Ginns, Ian ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Design technology education; Designerly thinking; Novice designers; Preservice teacher knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037791877     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012693626534     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Altshuller, G. S. (1988). Creativity as an exact science. New York: Gordon and Breach.
2. Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 21-23.
3. Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1992). Technology capability. In R. McCormick, P. Murphy, & M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and learning technology (pp. 51-57). Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.
4. Curriculum Corporation. (1994). A statement on technology for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria: Author.
5. Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155-1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Faulkner, W. (1994). Conceptualising knowledge used in innovation: A second look at the science - technology distinction and industrial innovation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 19(4), 425-458.
7. Frey, R. E. (1989). A philosophical framework for understanding technology. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 27(1), 23-35.
8. Gooding, D. (1992). Putting agency back into experiment. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 65-112). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1998). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 137-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Johnsey, R. (1995). The design process - does it exist? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 199-217.
12. Jones, A. (1997). An analysis of student existing technological capability: Developing an initial framework. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 241-258
13. Jones, A., & Carr, M. D. (1993). Working papers from the Learning in Technology Education Project (Vols. 1, 2, 3). Hamilton, NZ: University of Waikato.
14. Jones, J. C. (1992). Design methods (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
15. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., & Green, R. (1996). Understanding practice in design and technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. th European conference for learning and instruction, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
17. McCormick, R. (1994). Learning through apprenticeship. In D. Blandow, & M. J. Dyrenfurth (Eds.), Technology education in school and industry. Emerging didactics for human resource development (pp. 16-36). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. McCormick, R., Murphy, P., Hennessy, S., & Davidson, M. (1996, April). Research on student learning of designing and problem solving in technology activity in schools in England. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
19. McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. S., & Stein, S. J. (2000). Preservice primary teachers' thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 81-101.
20. Open Access Support Centre. (1996). Senior multi-strand science. The science of toys. The State of Queensland (Department of Education): Author (Booklets 17 & 18 plus video).
21. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
22. Rennie, L. J., & Jarvis, T. (1994). Helping children understand technology. Adelaide, South Adelaide: Department for Education and Children's Services.
23. Roden, C. (1999). How children's problem solving strategies develop at key stage 1. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4(1), 21-27.
24. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science. Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Roth, W.-M., McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, K. B., & Boutonné, S. (1997). The local production of order in traditional science laboratories: A phenomenological analysis. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 107-136.
27. Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28. Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135-156.
29. Vincenti, W. G. (1984). Technological knowledge without science: The innovation of flush riveting in American airplanes, ca 1930-ca 1950. Technology and Culture, 25(3), 540-576.
30. Welch, M. (1999). Analyzing the tacit strategies of novice designers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), 19-34.