Learning to make a difference: Gender, new technologies, and in/equity

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 119-135

  Bryson, Mary ^a   De Castell, Suzanne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047697593     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca0302_4     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Acker, S., & Oatley, K. (1993). Gender issues in education for science and technology: Current situations and prospects for change. Canadian Journal of Education, 18(31), 255-272
2. Allen, C. (1992). Multimedia learning environments designed with organized principles from non-school settings. Golem, 2, 9-18
3. Apple, M., & Jungck, S. (1990). "You don't have to be a teacher to teach this unit:" Teaching, Technology, and gender in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 227-251
4. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press
5. Becker, H. (1986). Our national report card: Preliminary results from the new John's Hopkin's survey. Classroom Computer Learning, 6, 30-33
6. Benston, M. (1985). The myth of computer literacy. Canadian Women's Studies, 5, 20-22
7. Bettelheim, B. (1955). Truants from life: The rehabilitation of emotionally disturbed children. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
8. Bryson, M. (1993). New technologies/New practices?: Teachers, machines, and the cultures of Primary schooling. Final Report Submitted to the Educational Technology Center, Victoria, BC: Ministry of Education
9. Bryson, M., & de Castell, S. (1993a). En/Gendering equity: On some paradoxical consequences of institutionalized programs of emancipation. Educational Theory, 43, 341-355
10. Bryson, M., & de Castell, S. (1993b). Queer pedagogy: Praxis makes im/perfect. Canadian Journal of Education, 18(3), 285-305
11. Bryson, M., & de Castell, S. (1994). Telling tales out of school: Modernist, critical, and postmodern "true stories" about educational computing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(3), 199-221
12. Bryson, M., & de Castell, S. (1995). So we've got a chip on our shoulder: Sexing the texts of educational technology, In J. Gaskell and J. Willinsky (Eds.), Gender in/forms curriculum: From enrichment to transformation (pp. 21-42). New York: Teachers College Press
13. Bush, C. (1983). Women and the assessment of technology: to Think, to Be, to Unthink, to Free. In J. Rothschild (Ed.), Machina ex dea: Feminist perspectives on technology. New York: Pergammon Press
14. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge
15. Chafetz, J. (1990). Gender equity. London: Sage Publications
16. Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men, and technological know-how. London: Pluto Press
17. Cole, M., & Griffin, P. (1986). A sociohistorical appraoch to remediation. In S. de Castell, A. Luke, & K. Egan (Eds.), Literacy, society and schooling: A reader. New York: Cambridge University Press
18. Collis, B. (1985). Sex-related differences in attitudes toward computers: Implications for counselors. The School Counselor, 33, 121-130
19. Collis, B., Kass, H., & Kieran, T. (1989). National trends in computer use among Canadian secondary school students: Implications for cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Research in Education, Fall, 77-89
20. Damarin, S. (1991). Feminist unthinking and educational technology. Educational Technology, 28 (2), 111-119
21. Damarin, S. (1993). School and situated knowledge: Travel or tourism? Educational Technology, 33, 27-32
22. de Castell, S., & Haig-Brown, C. (1993). Imagining ethnography. Anthropology and-Education Quarterly, 24, 83-92
23. de Lauretis, T. (1987). Technologies of gender. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press
24. Elkjaer, B. (1992) Girls and information technology in Denmark: An account of a socially constructed problem. Gender and Education, 4, 25-40
25. Franklin, U. (1992). The real world of technology. Concord, ONT: House of Anansi Press
26. Gaskell, P. J., McLaren, A., Oberg, A., & Eyre, L. (1992). British Columbia mathematics assessment: Gender issues in student choices in mathematics and science. Report submitted to the Minister of Education. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Education
27. Goodson, I., & Mangan, M. (1991). Qualitative educational research studies: Methodologies in transition (Vol.1). Ruccus Occasional Papers, London, ONT: Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario
28. Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1987). New technologies, basic skills and the underside of education. What's to be done? In J. A. Langer (Ed.), Language, literacy, and culture: Issues of society and schooling (pp. 110-131). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
29. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
30. Hacker, S. (1989). Pleasure, power, and technology. Boston: Unwin Hyman
31. Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980's. In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge
32. , F. (1987). Female sexualization. London, GB: Verso
33. Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
34. Horsman, J. (1990). Something in my mind beside the everyday: Women and literacy. Toronto, ONT: Women's Press
35. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC). (1989). Kids and computers: A positive vision of the future. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 73-86
36. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. New York: Routledge
37. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press
38. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new. New York: Oxford University Press
39. Mohanty, C. (1990). On race and voice. Cultural Critique, 2, 179-208
40. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research. Boston: Routledge
41. Pea, R. (1991). Multimedia Works: Student learning through multimedia tools. Golem, 3, 2-8
42. Penley, C., & Ross, A. (1991). Introduction. In C. Penley & A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
43. Rabinow, P. (1986). Representations are social facts. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture (pp. 234-261). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
44. Rockhill,K. (1987). Gender, language, and the politicsofliteracy. BritishJounialofSociologyofEducation,8(2), 81-101
45. Rothschild, J. (1983). Introduction: Why Machina Ex Dea? In J. Rothschild (Ed.), Machina Ex Dea. New York: Pergammon Press
46. Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. Toronto, ONT: University of Toronto Press
47. Sutton, R. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61, 475-503
48. Textor, R., Bayardo, B., Daly, H., Dietrich, J., Eilers, M., Ellis, N., Fleischman, R., Frau, D., Hoffman, D., Ko, C., Leechor, C., Leitz, S., Miller, D., Pradubhanitisarn, S., Short, K., Smith, R., Starbuck, J., Thapa, M., Turner, M. (1985). Anticipatory anthropology and the telemicroelectronic revolution. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 16 (1), 3-30
49. Weiler, K. (1988). Women teaching for change. New York: Bergin & Garvey
50. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
51. Whyte, J. (1986). Girls into science and technology: The story of a project. Boston: Routledge
52. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Oxford University Press
53. Wittig, M. (1969). Les guerilleres. Boston: Beacon Press