Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 1825-1838

  Goodbody, Susan J ^a   Wolpert, Daniel M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; FORCE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINESIOLOGY; LEARNING; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY;

EID: 0031921078     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1825     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ABEND, W., BIZZI, E., AND MORASSO, P. Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105: 331-348, 1982.
2. ATKESON, C. G. AND HOLLERBACH, J. M. Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J. Neurosci. 5: 2318-2330, 1985.
3. BERNSTEIN, N. The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. London: Pergamon, 1967.
4. EFRON, B. The Jacknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Phildelphia: Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 1982.
5. FLANAGAN, J. R. AND RAO, A. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J. Neurophysiol. 5: 2174-2178, 1995.
6. FLASH, T. AND GUREVICH, I. Human motor adaptation to external loads. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf. 13: 885-886, 1991.
7. FLASH, T. AND GUREVICH, I. Models of motor adaptation and impedance control in human arm movements. In: Self-Organization, Computational Maps and Motor Control, edited by P. Morasso and V. Sanguineti. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997, p. 423-481.
8. FLASH, T. AND HOGAN, N. The co-ordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J. Neurosci. 5: 1688-1703, 1985.
9. GALLISTEL, C. R. The Organization of Action: A New Synthesis. Hilladale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
10. GANDOLFO, F., MUSSA-IVALDI, F. A., AND BIZZI, E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 3843-3846, 1996.
11. GEORGOPOULOS, A. P., KALASKA, J. F., CAMINITI, R., AND MASSEY, J. T. On the relation between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2: 1527-1537, 1982.
12. GEORGOPOULOS, A. P., SCHWARTZ, A. B., AND KETTNER, R. E. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233: 1416-1419, 1986.
13. GHAHRAMANI, Z. AND WOLPERT, D. M. Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 386: 392-395, 1997.
14. GHAHRAMANI, Z., WOLPERT, D. M., AND JORDAN, M. I. Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation. J. Neurosci. 16: 7085-7096, 1996.
15. GOMI, H. AND KAWATO, M. Neural network control for a closed-loop system using feedback-error-learning. Neural Networks 6: 933-946, 1993.
16. GUREVICH, I. Strategies Used by the Human Central Nervous System in the Control of Planar Two-Joint Movement in Response to a Change of External Conditions (PhD thesis). Revohot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science, 1993.
17. HOLLERBACH, J. M. Computers, brains and the control of movement. Trends Neurosci. 5: 189-192, 1982.
18. IMAMIZU, H., UNO, Y., AND KAWATO, M. Internal representations of the motor apparatus - implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. J. Exp. Psychol Hum. Percept. Perform. 21: 1174-1198, 1995.
19. ITO, M. The Cerebellum and Neural Control. New York: Raven Press, 1984.
20. JARIC, D., CORCOS, D. M., AGARWAL, G. C., AND GOTTLIEB, G. L. Principles for learning single joint movements. II. Generalizing a learned behavior. Exp. Brain Res. 94: 514-521, 1993.
21. JORDAN, M. I. Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In: Handbook of Perception and Action: Motor Skills, edited by H. Heuer and S. Keele. New York: Academic Press, 1995, p. 71.
22. JORDAN, M. I. AND RUMELHART, D. E. Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognit. Sci. 16: 307-354, 1992.
23. KAWATO, M. Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised learning. In: Advanced Neural Computers, edited by R. Eckmiller. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990, p. 365-372.
24. KAWATO, M. Trajectory formation in arm movements: minimization principles and procedures. In: Advances in Motor Learning and Control, edited by H. N. Zelaznik. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1996, p. 225-259.
25. KAWATO, M., FURAWAKA, K., AND SUZUKI, R. A hierarchical neural network model for the control and learning of voluntary movements. Biol. Cybern. 56: 1-17, 1987.
26. KELSO, J.A.S., SOUTHARD, D. L., AND GOODMAN, D. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science 203: 1029-1031, 1979.
27. KITAZAWA, S., KIMURA, T., AND UKA, T. Prism adaptation of reaching movements: specificity for the velocity of reaching. J. Neurosci. 17: 1481-1492, 1997.
28. LACKNER, J. R. AND DIZIO, P. Factors contributing to initial reaching errors and adaptation to coriolis force pertubations. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 19: 1595: 1993.
29. LACKNER, J. R. AND DIZIO, P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 72: 299-313, 1994.
30. LORDAHL, D. S. AND ARCHER, E. F. Transfer effects on a rotary pursuit task as a function of first-task difficulty. J. Exp. Psychol. 56: 5:421-426, 1958.
31. MIALL, R. C., WEIR, D. J., WOLPERT, D. M., AND STEIN, J. F. Is the cerebellum a Smith Predictor? J. Motor Behav. 25: 203-216, 1993.
32. MORASSO, P. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp. Brain Res. 42: 223-227, 1981.
33. NAMIKAS, G. AND ARCHER, E. F. Motor skill transfer as a function of intertask interval and pretransfer task difficulty. J. Exp. Psychol. 59: 2:109-112, 1960.
34. ROBINSON, D. A., GORDON, J. L., AND GORDON, S. E. A model of the smootl pursuit eye movement system. Biol. Cybern. 55: 43-57, 1986.
35. SABES, P. AND JORDAN, M. I. Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model for motor planning. J. Neurosci. 17: 7119-7128, 1997.
36. SAINBURG, R. L. AND GHEZ, C. Limitations in the learning and generalization of multijoint dynamics. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 21: 686, 1995.
37. SCHWARTZ, A. B. Direct cortical representation of drawing. Science 265: 540-542, 1994.
38. SCOTT, S. AND KALASKA, J. F. Motor cortical activity is altered by changes in arm posture for identical hand trajectories. J. Neurophysiol. 73: 2563-2567, 1995.
39. SCOTT, S. AND KALASKA, J. F. Reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm orientations. I. Activity of individual cells in motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 826-852, 1997.
40. SHADMEHR, R. AND MUSSA-IVALDI, F. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14: 5: 3208-3224, 1994.
41. SUTTON, R. S. AND BARTO, A. G. Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. Psychol. Rev. 88: 135-170, 1981.
42. TIKHONOV, A. N. AND ARSENIN, V. Y. Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. Washington, DC: W. H. Winston, 1977.
43. UNO, Y., KAWATO, M., AND SUZUKI, R. Formation and control of optimal trajectories in human multijoint arm movements: minimum torque-change model. Biol. Cybern. 61: 89-101, 1989.
44. WOLPERT, D. M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cognit. Sci. 1: 209-216, 1997.
45. WOLPERT, D. M., GHAHRAMANI, Z., AND JORDAN, M. I. Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Exp. Brain Res. 98: 153-156, 1994.
46. WOLPERT, D. M., GHAHRAMANI, Z., AND JORDAN, M. I. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp. Brain Res. 103: 460-470, 1995a.
47. WOLPERT, D. M., GHAHRAMANI, Z., AND JORDAN, M. I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882, 1995b.