Functional magnetic resonance imaging in stroke recovery

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Volumn 14, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Cramer, Steven C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD OXYGENATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR CORTEX; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; POSTSYNAPTIC MEMBRANE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

BRAIN; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 0037328110     PISSN: 10479651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-9651(02)00053-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Gresham G, Duncan P, Stason W, et al. Post-stroke rehabilitation. Rockville, (MD), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1995.
2. Duncan P, Goldstein L, Matchar D, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 1992;23:1084-9.
3. Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394-8.
4. Cohen M, Bookheimer S. Localization of brain function using magnetic resonance imaging. Trends Neurosci 1995;17:268-77.
5. Heeger D, Ress D. What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002;3:142-51.
6. Logothetis N, Pauls J, Augath M, et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 2001;412:150-7.
7. Cao Y, D'Olhaberriague L, Vikingstad E, et al. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke 1998;29:112-22.
8. Cramer S, Nelles G, Benson R, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997;28:2518-27.
9. Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise R, et al. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1991;29:63-71.
10. Honda M, Nagamine T, Fukuyama H, et al. Movement-related cortical potentials and regional cerebral blood flow change in patients with stroke after motor recovery. J Neurol Sci 1997;146:117-26.
11. Seitz R, Hoflich P, Binkofski F, et al. Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol 1998;55:1081-8.
12. Weiller C, Ramsay S, Wise R, et al. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol 1993;33:181-9.
13. Green J, Bialy Y, Sora E, et al. High-resolution EEG in poststroke hemiparesis can identify ipsilateral generators during motor tasks. Stroke 1999;30:2659-65.
14. Kim S-G, Ashe J, Hendrich K, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. Science 1993;261:615-7.
15. Cramer S, Chopp M. Recovery recapitulates ontogeny. Trends Neurosci 2000;23:265-71.
16. Nudo R. Recovery after damage to motor cortical areas. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999;9: 740-7.
17. Nudo R, Wise B, SiFuentes F, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996;272:1791-4.
18. Xerri C, Merzenich M, Peterson B, et al. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1998;79:2119-48.
19. Cramer S, Moore C, Finklestein S, et al. A pilot study of somatotopic mapping after cortical infarct. Stroke 2000;31:668-71.
20. Pineiro R, Pendlebury S, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Functional MRI detects posterior shifts in primary sensorimotor cortex activation after stroke: evidence of local adaptive reorganization? Stroke 2001;32:1134-9.
21. Rossini P, Caltagirone C, Castriota-Scanderbeg A, et al. Hand motor cortical area reorganization in stroke: a study with fMRI, MEG and TCS maps. Neuroreport 1998;9: 2141-6.
22. Alagona G, Delvaux V, Gerard P, et al. Ipsilateral motor responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and acute-stroke patients. Stroke 2001;32: 1304-9.
23. Escudero J, Sancho J, Bautista D, et al. Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1998;29:1854-9.
24. Netz J, Lammers T, Homberg V. Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain 1997; 120:1579-86.
25. Turton A, Wroe S, Trepte N, et al. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogy Clin Neurophysiol 1996;101:316-28.
26. Zemke A, Cramer S. A functional MRI study of motor recovery patterns after stroke. Stroke 2002;33:351.
27. Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre J, et al. Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke 2001;32:2534-42.
28. Cramer S, Bastings E. Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology 2000;39:842-51.
29. Heiss W, Kessler J, Thiel A, et al. Differential capacity of left and right hemispheric areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol 1999;45:430-8.
30. Marshall R, Perera G, Lazar R, et al. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000;31:656-61.
31. Nelles G, Spiekermann G, Jueptner M, et al. Evolution of functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke: a serial positron emission tomographic activation study. Ann Neurol 1999;46:901-9.
32. Jones T, Schallert T. Overgrowth and pruning of dendrites in adult rats recovering from neocortical damage. Brain Res 1992;581:156-60.
33. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A, et al. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 1997;28:110-7.
34. Poldrack R. Imaging brain plasticity: conceptual and methodological issues - a theoretical review. Neuroimage 2000;12:1-3.
35. Powers W, Fox P, Raichle M. The effect of carotid artery disease on the cerebrovascular response to physiologic stimulation. Neurology 1988;38:1475-8.
36. Cramer S, Mark A, Maravilla K. Preserved cortical function with reduced cerebral blood flow after stroke, Stroke 2002;33:418.
37. Cramer S, Stegbauer K, Mark A, et al. Motor cortex activation in hemiparetic stroke patients. Stroke 2001;32:334.
38. Mima T, Sadato N, Yazawa S, et al. Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain 1999;122:1989-97.
39. Weiller C, Juptner M, Fellows S, et al. Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage 1996;4:105-10.
40. Kastner S, Ungerleider L. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000;23:315-41.
41. Carey J, Kimberley T, Lewis S, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain 2002;125:773-88.
42. Kondziolka D, Wechsler L, Goldstein S, et al. Transplantation of cultured human neuronal cells for patients with stroke. Neurology 2000;55:565-9.
43. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang H, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31:1210-6.
44. Nelles G, Jentzen W, Jueptner M, et al. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 2001;13:1146-54.
45. Pariente J, Loubinoux I, Carel C, et al. Fluoxetine modulates motor performance and cerebral activation of patients recovering from stroke. Ann Neurol 2001;50:718-29.
46. Walker-Batson D, Smith P, Curtis S, et al. Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Further evidence. Stroke 1995;26:2254-9.
47. Bucher H, Guyatt G, Cook D, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XIX. Applying clinical trial results. A. How to use an article measuring the effect of an intervention on surrogate end points. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1999;282:771-8.
48. Fleming T, DeMets D. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med 1996;125:605-13.