Mapping research specialties

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue , 2008, Pages 213-295

  Morris, Steven A ^a,b   Van Der Veer Martens, Betsy ^c  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAKER HUGHES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349127656     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113     Document Type: Review

References (372)

1. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2004). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(9), 843.
2. Allen, B. (1997). Referring to schools of thought: An example of symbolic citations. Social Studies of Science, 27(4), 937-949.
3. Andrews, J. E. (2003). An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(1), 47-56.
4. Baldi, S., & Hargens, L. L. (1997). Re-examining Price's conjectures on the structure of reference networks: Results from the special relativity, spatial diffusing modeling and role analysis literature. Social Studies of Science, 27(6), 669-687.
5. Barber, B. (1952). Science and the social order. New York: Free Press.
6. Bar-Ilan, J. (2001). Data collection methods on the Web for informetric purposes: A review and analysis. Scientometrics, 50(1), 7-32.
7. Basu, A., & Lewison, G. (2006, January). Visualization of a scientific community of Indian origin in the US: A case study of bioinformatics and genomics. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting, Nancy, France.
8. Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. Retrieved February 13, 2007, from arxiv.org/PS_cache/cs/pdf/0309/ 0309023.pdf
9. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Analysis and visualization of large networks. In M. Jungar & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software (pp. 77-103). Berlin: Springer.
10. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. Bean, C. A., & Green, R. (2001). Relevance relationships. In C. A. Bean & R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 115-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
12. Beaver, D. D. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84.
13. Beaver, D. D. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite. Scientometrics, 1(2), 133-149.
14. Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(3), 231-245.
15. Beghtol, C. (2001). Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning. In C. A. Bean & R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 99-113). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
16. Beghtol, C. (2003). Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: Relationships between "professional" and "naïve" classifications. Knowledge Organization, 30(2), 64-73.
17. Bellardo, T. (1980). The use of co-citations to study science. Library Research, 2, 231-237.
18. Ben-David, J. (1960). Roles and innovation in medicine. American Journal of Sociology, 65(6), 557-568.
19. Ben-David, J., & Collins, R. (1966). Social factors in the origin of a new science: The case of psychology. American Sociological Review, 31(4), 451-465.
20. Bernal, J. D. (1939). The social function of science. London: Routledge.
21. Bertin, J. (2001). Matrix theory of graphics. Information Design Journal, 10(1), 5-19.
22. Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2006). Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 68, 377-393.
23. Bezdek, J. C. (1981). Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. New York: Plenum Press.
24. Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Bloor, D. (1997). Remember the strong program? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 22(3), 373-385.
26. Bonnevie-Nebelong, E. (2006). Methods for journal evaluation: Journal citation identity, journal citation image and internationalisation. Scientometrics, 66(2), 411.
27. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
28. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
29. Börner, K., Maru, J. T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States, 101(suppl. 1), 5266-5273.
30. Boyack, K. W., & Börner, K. (2003). Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 447-461.
31. Boyack, K. W., Wylie, B. N., & Davidson, G. S. (2002). Domain visualization using VxInsight® for science and technology management. Journal of the American Society for Information Society and Technology, 53(9), 764-774.
32. Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(4), 233-251.
33. Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229.
34. Brooks, T. A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36.
35. Brown, C. M. (1999). Information-seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 929-943.
36. Budd, J. M. (1999). Citation and knowledge claims: Sociology of knowledge as a case in point. Journal of Information Science, 25(4), 265-274.
37. Budd, J. M. (2001). Misreading science in the twentieth century. Science Communication, 22(3), 300-315.
38. Budd, J. M., & Hurt, C. D. (1991). Superstring theory: Information transfer in an emerging field. Scientometrics, 21(1), 87-98.
39. Burrell, Q. L. (2002a). The nth-citation distribution and obsolescence. Scientometrics, 53(3), 309-323.
40. Burrell, Q. L. (2002b). Will this paper ever be cited? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(3), 232-235.
41. Calero, C., Butler, R., Valdés, C. C., & Noyons, E. (2006). How to identify research groups using publication analysis: An example in the field of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 66(2), 365-376.
42. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.
43. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Sciences Information, 22, 191-235.
44. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Qualitative scientometrics. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology (pp. 103-123). London: Macmillan.
45. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Ethnocentricism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328-348). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
46. Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Case, D. O., & Higgins, G. M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 635-645.
48. Chen, C. (1999). Visualizing semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 35, 401-420.
49. Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive domain knowledge visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States, 101(suppl. 1), 5303-5310.
50. Chen, C. (2006). Citespace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
51. Chen, C., Cribbin, T., Macredie, R., & Morar, S. (2002). Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms: Two case studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 678-689.
52. Chen, C., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199-211.
53. Chen, C., Paul, R. J., & Okeefe, B. (2001). Fitting the jigsaw of citation: Information visualization in domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 315-330.
54. Chen, C. M., & Morris, S. A. (2003, October). Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks. Paper presented at the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, Seattle, Washington.
55. Chen, P. (1976). The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36.
56. Chubin, D. E. (1976). The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociological Quarterly, 17(4), 448-476.
57. Chubin, D. E. (1985). Beyond invisible colleges: Inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 221-254.
58. Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5, 423-441.
59. Cole, J. R. (1989). The paradox of universal particularism and institutional universalism. Social Science Information, 28(1), 51-76.
60. Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1972). The Ortega hypothesis: Citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress. Science, 178(4059), 368-373.
61. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1975). The emergence of a scientific specialty: The self-exemplifying case of the sociology of science. In L. A. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 139-174). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
62. Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 286-306.
63. Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 111-139.
64. Cole, S. (1993). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Cole, S. (2000). The role of journals in the growth of scientific knowledge. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 109-142). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
66. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 377-390.
67. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Collins, H. M. (1974). The TEA-set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies, 4, 165-186.
69. Collins, H. M. (1998). The meaning of data: Open and closed evidential cultures in the search for gravitational waves. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 293-338.
70. Collins, R. (1968). Competition and social control in science: An essay in theory construction. Sociology of Education, 41(2), 123-140.
71. Collins, R. (1989). Toward a theory of intellectual change: The social causes of philosophies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 14(2), 107-140.
72. Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(13), 1206-1223.
74. Courtial, J. P. (1994). A co-word analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics, 31(3), 251-260.
75. Courtial, J. P. (1998). Comments on Leydesdorff's article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1), 98.
76. Courtial, J. P., & Law, J. (1989). A co-word study of artificial intelligence. Social Studies of Science, 19(2), 301-311.
77. Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comprehensive review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527-540.
78. Cozzens, S. E. (1985). Using the archive: Derek Price's theory of differences among the sciences. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 431-441.
79. Cozzens, S. E. (1989a). Social control and multiple discovery in science: The opiate receptor case. Albany: State University of New York Press.
80. Cozzens, S. E. (1989b). What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics, 15, 437-447.
81. Crane, D. (1969a). Fashion in science: Does it exist? Social Problems, 16(4), 433-441.
82. Crane, D. (1969b). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the "invisible college" hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34, 335-352.
83. Crane, D. (1970). The nature of scientific communication and influence. International Social Science Journal, 22(1), 28-41.
84. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Crane, D. (1976). Reward systems in art, science, and religion. American Behavioral Scientist, 19(6), 719-734.
86. Crane, D. (1980). An exploratory study of Kuhnian paradigms in theoretical high energy physics. Social Studies of Science, 10, 23-54.
87. Crawford, S. (1971). Informal communication among scientists in sleep research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22(5), 301-310.
88. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
89. Cronin, B. (2004). Normative shaping of scientific practice: The magic of Merton. Scientometrics, 60(1), 41-46.
90. Cronin, B. (2005). The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
91. De Mey, M. (1982). The cognitive paradigm. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
92. Diamond, A. M. (1984). An economic model of the life-cycle research productivity of scientists. Scientometrics, 6, 189-196.
93. Diamond, A. M. (1985). The money values of citations to single-authored and multiple-authored articles. Scientometrics, 8, 815-820.
94. Diamond, A. M. (1986). What is a citation worth? Journal of Human Resources, 21(2), 200-215.
95. Diamond, A. M. (2000). The complementarity of scientometrics and economics. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festchrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 321-336). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
96. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2000). Journals as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval area, 1987-1997. Scientometrics, 47(1), 55-73.
97. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37(6), 817-842.
98. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2001). Pattern classification (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
99. Edge, D. O. (1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science, 17(2), 102-134.
100. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
101. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth and utilization: Definitions and relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(11), 1004-1017.
102. Ennis, J. G. (1992). The social organization of sociological knowledge: Structural models of the intersections of specialties. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 259-265.
103. Eom, S. B. (1996). The contributions of organizational science to the development of decision support systems research subspecialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 941-952.
104. Eom, S. B. (2003). Author co-citation analysis using custom bibliographic databases: An introduction to the SAS approach. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
105. Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21, 198-233.
106. Etzkowitz, H. (1989). Entrepreneurial science in the academy: A case of the transformation of norms. Social Problems, 36(1), 14-29.
107. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
108. Feitelson, D. G., & Yovel, U. (2004). Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data. Journal of Documentation, 60(1), 44-61.
109. Fisher, C. S. (1966). The death of a mathematical theory: A study in the sociology of knowledge. Archive of the History of Exact Sciences, 3, 137-159.
110. Fisher, C. S. (1967). The last invariant theorists: A sociological study of the collective biographies of mathematical specialists. European Journal of Sociology, 8(2), 216-244.
111. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
112. Forrest, B. C., & Gross, P. R. (2003). Creationism's Trojan horse: The wedge of intelligent design. New York: Oxford University Press.
113. Freudenthal, G. (1984). The role of shared knowledge in science: The failure of the constructivist programme in the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 14, 285-295.
114. Fuchs, S. (1986). The social organization of scientific knowledge. Sociological Theory, 4, 126-142.
115. Fuchs, S. (1993). A sociological theory of scientific change. Social Forces, 71(4), 933-953.
116. Fuchs, S., & Spear, J. H. (1999). The social conditions of cumulation. American Sociologist, 30, 21-40.
117. Fuller, S., De Mey, M., Shinn, T., & Woolgar, S. (1989). The cognitive turn: Sociological and psychological perspectives on science. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
118. Furner, J. (2003). Bibliographic relationships, citation relations, relevance relationships, and bibliographic classification: An integrative view. Proceedings of the 13th ASIST SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, 42-52.
119. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation index for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.
120. Garfield, E. (1968). World brain or "Memex": Mechanical and intellectual requirements for universal bibliographic control. In E. B. Montgomery (Ed.), The foundations of access to knowledge: A symposium (pp. 169-196). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
121. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
122. Garfield, E. (1994). Research fronts. Current Contents, 41, 3-7.
123. Garfield, E. (2004a). The intended consequences of Robert K. Merton. Scientometrics, 60(1), 51-61.
124. Garfield, E. (2004b). The unintended and unanticipated consequences of Robert K. Merton. Social Studies of Science, 34(6), 845-853.
125. Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., & Istomin, V. S. (2003). Mapping the output of topical searches in the Web of Knowledge and the case of Watson-Crick. Information Technology and Libraries, 22(4), 183-187.
126. Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
127. Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1967). Scientific communication as a social system. Science, 157(3792), 1011-1016.
128. Gaston, J. (1970). The reward system in British science. American Sociological Review, 35(4), 718-732.
129. Gaston, J. (1973). Originality and competition in science: A study of the British high energy physics community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
130. Geison, G. L. (1993). Research schools and new directions in the historiography of science. Osiris, 8, 226-238.
131. Ghoniem, M., Fekete, J., & Castagliola, P. (2005). On the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations: A controlled experiment and statistical analysis. Information Visualization, 4, 114-135.
132. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary society. London: Sage.
133. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795.
134. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
135. Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113-122.
136. Gordon, A. D. (1999). Classification (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
137. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 778(6), 1360-1380.
138. Green, R. (2001). Relations in the organization of knowledge: An overview. In C. A. Bean & R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 3-18). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
139. Griffith, B. C., & Mullins, N. C. (1972). Coherent social groups in scientific change. Science, 177(4053), 959-964.
140. Griffith, B. C., Small, H. G., Stonehill, J. A., & Dey, S. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro- and microstructure of science. Science Studies, 4, 339-365.
141. Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
142. Hargens, L. L. (2000). Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 846-865.
143. Hargens, L. L. (2004). What is Mertonian sociology of science? Scientometrics, 60(1), 63-70.
144. Hargens, L. L., & Felmlee, D. H. (1984). Structural determinants of stratification in science. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 685-697.
145. Hargens, L. L., Mullins, N. C., & Hecht, P. K. (1980). Research areas and stratification processes in science. Social Studies of Science, 10(1), 56-74.
146. Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?: The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist, 42, 443-455.
147. He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 131-159.
148. Hetzler, E., & Turner, A. (2004). Analysis experiences using information visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(5), 22-26.
149. Hjørland, B., & Nielsen, L. K. (2001). Subject access points in electronic retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 249-298.
150. Hjørland, B., & Pedersen, K. N. (2005). A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 61(5), 582-597.
151. Holloway, T., Bozicevic, M., & Börner, K. (2007). Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity, 12(3), 30-40.
152. Holton, G. (1993). Science and anti-science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
153. Holzner, B. (1968). Reality construction in society. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
154. Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's philosophy of science (A. T. Levine, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
155. Hurt, C. D., & Budd, J. M. (1992). Modeling the literature of superstring theory: A case study of fast literature. Scientometrics, 24(3), 471-480.
156. Hwang, K. (2005). The inferior science and the dominant use of English in knowledge production. Science Communication, 26(4), 390-427.
157. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
158. Jacob, E. K. (2004). Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference. Library Trends, 52(3), 515-540.
159. Jarneving, B. (2001). The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular research. Scientometrics, 50(3), 365-389.
160. Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for the mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263.
161. Jin, B., Rousseau, R., Suttmeier, R. P., & Cao, C. (2007, June). The role of ethnic ties in international collaboration: The overseas Chinese phenomenon. Paper presented at the International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics, Madrid, Spain.
162. Jones, W. P., & Furnas, G. W. (1987). Pictures of relevance: A geometrical analysis of similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(6), 420-442.
163. Kärki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: An author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 323-334.
164. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
165. Kaufer, D. S., & Carley, K. M. (1993). Communication at a distance: The influence of print on sociocultural organization and change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
166. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
167. Kim, K.-M. (1994). Explaining scientific consensus: The case of Mendelian genetics. New York: Guilford Press.
168. Kim, K.-M. (1996). Hierarchy of scientific consensus and the flow of dissensus over time. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 26, 3-25.
169. Kinchy, A. J., & Kleinman, D. L. (2003). Organizing credibility: Discursive and organizational orthodoxy on the borders of ecology and politics. Social Studies of Science, 33(6), 869-896.
170. Knorr, K. D. (1975). The nature of scientific consensus and the case of social sciences. In K. D. Knorr, H. Strasser, & H. G. Zilian (Eds.), Determinants and controls of scientific development. Boston: D. Reidel.
171. Knorr Cetina, K. (1991). Epistemic cultures: Forms of reason in science. History of Political Economy, 23(1), 105-122.
172. Knorr Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
173. Knorr Cetina, K. D. (1982). Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research?: A critique of quasi-economic models of science. Social Studies of Science, 12(1), 101-130.
174. Kostoff, R. N., del Rio, J. A., Hunenik, J. A., Garcia, E. O., & Ramirez, A. M. (2001). Citation mining: Integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1148-1156.
175. Krauze, T. K. (1972). Social and intellectual structures of science: A mathematical analysis. Science Studies, 2, 369-393.
176. Kretschmer, H., Hoffmann, U., & Kretschmer, T. (2006). Collaboration structures between German immunology institutions, and gender visibility, as reflected in the Web. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 117-126.
177. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
178. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd, enlarged ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
179. Kuhn, T. S. (2000). Afterword. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since structure: Philosophical essays 1970-1983, with an autobiographical interview (pp. 224-252). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
180. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University Press.
181. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
182. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific knowledge (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
183. Laudan, L., Donovan, A., Laudan, R., Barker, P., Brown, H., Lepllin, J., et al. (1986). Scientific change: Philosophical models and historical research. Synthese, 69, 141-223.
184. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15.
185. Law, J., & Whitaker, J. (1992). Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics, 23(3), 417-461.
186. Leazer, G. H., & Smiraglia, R. P. (1999). Bibliographic families in the library catalog: A qualitative analysis and grounded theory. Library Resources & Technical Services, 43(4), 191-212.
187. Lewis, G. L. (1980). The relationship of conceptual development to consensus: An exploratory analysis of three subfields. Social Studies of Science, 10(3), 285-308.
188. Leydesdorff, L. (1994). The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 31(1), 59-84.
189. Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 418-427.
190. Leydesdorff, L. (2001a). The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Parkland, FL: Universal Publishers.
191. Leydesdorff, L. (2001b). A sociological theory of communication: Self organization of the knowledge society. Parkland, FL: Universal Publishers.
192. Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Similarity measures, author cocitation analysis, and information theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 769-772.
193. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(5), 601-613.
194. Leydesdorff, L., & Amsterdamska, O. (1990). Dimensions of citation analysis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(3), 305-335.
195. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23, 279-286.
196. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195-203.
197. Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616-1628.
198. Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 59-69). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
199. Lievrouw, L. A. (1992). Communication, representation, and scientific knowledge: A conceptual framework and case study. Knowledge and Policy, 5(1), 6-28.
200. Liu, Z. (2005). Visualizing the intellectual structure in urban studies: A journal co-citation analysis (1992-2002). Scientometrics, 62(3), 385-402.
201. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317-323.
202. Lubetzky, S. (1969). Principles of cataloging. Los Angeles: University of California Institute of Library Research.
203. Luukkonen, T. (1997). Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Scientometrics, 38(1), 27-37.
204. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
205. Mählck, P., & Persson, O. (2000). Socio-bibliometric mapping of intra-departmental networks. Scientometrics, 49(1), 81-91.
206. Mai, J.-E. (2004). Classification in context: Relativity, reality and representation. Knowledge Organization, 31(1), 39-48.
207. Marion, L. (2004). Of tribes and totems: Author co-citation analysis of Kurt Lewin's influence on social science journals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia.
208. Markey, K. (2007). The online library catalog: Paradise lost and paradise regained. D-Lib, 13(1/2). Retrieved February 4, 2007, from www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/markey/01markey.html
209. Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20(4), 236.
210. Martyn, J. (1975). Citation analysis. Journal of Documentation, 31(4), 290-297.
211. Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 59-89). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
212. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-444.
213. McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296.
214. McCain, K. W. (1998). Neural networks research in context: A longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 41(3), 389-410.
215. McCain, K. W., & McCain, R. A. (2002). Mapping "A Beautiful Mind": A comparison of the author cocitation PFNets for John Nash, John Harsanyi, and Reinhard Selten: The three winners of the 1994 Nobel prize for economics. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 552-553.
216. McCain, K. W., Verner, J. M., Hislop, G. W., Evanco, W., & Cole, V. (2005). The use of bibliometric and knowledge elicitation techniques to map a knowledge domain: Software engineering in the 1990s. Scientometrics, 65(1), 131-144.
217. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.
218. Mellor, F. (2003). Between fact and fiction: Demarcating science from non-science in popular physics books. Social Studies of Science, 33(4), 509-538.
219. Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635-659.
220. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication system of science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
221. Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
222. Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606-623.
223. Michaelson, A. G. (1993). The development of a scientific specialty as diffusion through social relations: The case of role analysis. Social Networks, 15(3), 217-236.
224. Miksa, F. L. (1998). The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the post-modern library. Albany NY: Forest Press.
225. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
226. Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
227. Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1979). Citation patterns in scientific revolutions. Scientometrics, 1(2), 161-169.
228. Morris, S. A. (2005a). Manifestation of emerging specialties in journal literature: A growth model of papers, references, exemplars, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and clustering coefficient distribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1250-1273.
229. Morris, S. A. (2005b). Unified mathematical treatment of complex cascaded bipartite networks: The case of collections of journal papers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
230. Morris, S. A., & Boyack, K. W. (2005, July). Visualizing 60 years of anthrax research. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Stockholm, Sweden.
231. Morris, S. A., & Yen, G. (2004). Crossmaps: Visualization of overlapping relationships in collections of journal papers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl. 1), 5291-5296.
232. Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 413-422.
233. Mukerji, C., & Simon, B. (1998). Out of the limelight: Discredited communities and informal communication on the Internet. Sociological Inquiry, 68(2), 258-273.
234. Mulkay, M. J. (1971). Some suggestions for sociological research. Science Studies, 1, 207-213.
235. Mulkay, M. J. (1975). Three models of scientific development. Sociological Review, 23, 509-526.
236. Mulkay, M. J. (1976). The model of branching. Sociological Review, 24(1), 125-133.
237. Mulkay, M. J., & Edge, D. O. (1976). Cognitive, technical and social factors in the growth of radio astronomy. In G. Lemaine, R. MacLeod, M. J. Mulkay, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines (pp. 153-186). Chicago: Aldine.
238. Mulkay, M. J., Gilbert, G. N., & Woolgar, S. (1975). Problem areas and research networks in science. Sociology, 9(2), 187-203.
239. Mullins, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10(1), 51-82.
240. Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
241. Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L. L., Hecht, P. K., & Kick, E. L. (1977). The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42(4), 552-562.
242. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
243. Naranan, S. (1971). Power law relations in science bibliography: A self-consistent interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 27(2), 83-97.
244. Narin, F. (1975). Evaluative bibliometrics. Cherry Hill, NJ: Computer Horizons.
245. Nebelong-Bonnevie, E., & Frandsen, T. F. (2006). Journal citation identity and journal citation image: A portrait of the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 30-57.
246. Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., Asher, A., & Wrede, C. (2006). The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2), 127-141.
247. Newman, M. E. J. (2000). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks (SFI Working Paper 00-12-064). Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute.
248. Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks I: Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, 016131.
249. Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks II: Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64, 016132.
250. Newman, M. E. J. (2001c). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 404-409.
251. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 5200-5205.
252. Nicholas, D., & Ritchie, M. (1978). Literature and bibliometrics. London: Clive Bingley.
253. Nicolaisen, J. (2003). The social act of citing: Towards new horizons in citation theory. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 12-20.
254. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 609-641.
255. Noyons, E. (2001). Bibliographic mapping of science in a science policy context. Scientometrics, 50(1), 83-98.
256. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
257. Oehler, K., Snizek, W. E., & Mullins, N. C. (1989). Words and sentences over time: How facts are built and sustained in a specialty area. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 14(3), 258-274.
258. Olson, H. A. (1998). Mapping beyond Dewey's boundaries: Constructing classificatory space for marginalized knowledge domains. Library Trends, 47(2), 233-254.
259. Oppenheim, C., & Renn, S. P. (1979). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(5), 225-231.
260. Paisley, W. J. (1968). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1, 1-30.
261. Pao, M. L. (1992). Global and local collaborators: A study of scientific collaboration. Information Processing & Management, 28(1), 99-109.
262. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 31-38.
263. Persson, O. (2001). All author citations versus first author citations. Scientometrics, 50(2), 339-344.
264. Persson, O., & Beckmann, M. (1995). Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities. Scientometrics, 33(3), 351-366.
265. Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis: An exercise on a university faculty level. Scientometrics, 20(1), 235-255.
266. Porter, A. L., Roper, A. T., Mason, T. W., Rossini, F. A., & Banks, J. (1991). Forecasting and management of technology. New York: Wiley.
267. Price, D. J. D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
268. Price, D. J. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.
269. Price, D. J. D. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and nonscience. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 3-15). Lexington, MA: Heath-Lexington Books.
270. Price, D. J. D. (1986). Invisible colleges and the affluent scientific commuter. In Little science, big science . . . and beyond (pp. 56-81). New York: Columbia University Press.
271. Price, D. J. D., & Beaver, D. D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21, 1011-1018.
272. Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
273. Reader, D., & Watkins, D. (2006). The social and collaborative nature of entrepreneurship scholarship: A co-citation and perceptual analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 417-441.
274. Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B, 4(2), 131-134.
275. Reid, E., & Chen, H. (2005). Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain: Researchers, publications, and institutions analysis. In P. Kantor, G. Muresan, F. Roberts, D. Zeng, F.-Y. Wang, H. Chen, & R. Merkle (Eds.), Intelligence and Security Informatics (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3495, pp. 322-339). Berlin: Springer.
276. Rheingold, N. (1980). Through paradigm-land to a normal history of science. Social Studies of Science, 10(4), 475-496.
277. Rip, A., & Courtial, J. P. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6, 381-400.
278. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
279. Rogers, E. M., Dearing, J. W., & Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 68-84.
280. Rose, S. K. (1996). What's love got to do with it?: Scholarly citation practices as courtship rituals. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 1(3), 34-48.
281. Rosengren, K. E. (1968). Sociological aspects of the literary system. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
282. Rouse, J. (1993). What are cultural studies of scientific knowledge? Configurations, 1(1), 57-94.
283. Rousseau, R., & Zuccala, A. (2004). A classification of author co-citations: Definitions and search strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Society and Technology, 55(6), 513.
284. Salton, G. (1989). Automatic text processing: The transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
285. Sandstrom, P. E. (2001). Scholarly communication as a socioecological system. Scientometrics, 51(3), 573-605.
286. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(6), 321-343.
287. Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 551-585.
288. Schneider, J. W. (2006). Concept symbols revisited, naming clusters by parsing and filtering noun phrases from citation context of concept symbols. Scientometrics, 68(3), 573-593.
289. Schneider, J. W., & Borlund, P. (2005). A bibliometric-based semi-automatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms: Parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3507), 226-237.
290. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Durso, F. T., & Dearholt, D. W. (1989). Network structures in proximity data. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 24, 249-284.
291. Scott, E. C., & Cole, H. P. (1985). The elusive scientific basis of creation "science." Quarterly Review of Biology, 60(1), 21-30.
292. Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628-638.
293. Seglen, P. O., & Aksnes, D. W. (2000). Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49(1), 125-143.
294. Shepard, H. (1954). The value system of a university research group. American Sociological Review, 19(4), 456-462.
295. Shepard, H. A. (1956). Basic research and the social system of pure science. Philosophy of Science, 23(1), 48-57.
296. Shinn, T. (1999). Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science. Social Science Information, 3(1), 149-176.
297. Shinn, T. (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599-614.
298. Shrum, W. (1984). Scientific specialties and technical systems. Social Studies of Science, 14(1), 63-90.
299. Siirtola, H., & Makinen, E. (2005). Constructing and reconstructing the reorderable matrix. Information Visualization, 4, 32-48.
300. Simon, B. (2002). Undead science: Science studies and the afterlife of cold fusion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
301. Sinding, C. (1996). Literary genres and the construction of knowledge in biology: Semantic shifts and scientific change. Social Studies of Science, 26(1), 43-70.
302. Small, H. (2006). Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 595.
303. Small, H. G. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature: New measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
304. Small, H. G. (1974). Multiple citation patterns in scientific literature: The circle and hill models. Information Storage & Retrieval, 10(11-12), 393-402.
305. Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
306. Small, H. G. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183-196.
307. Small, H. G. (1985). Citation context analysis. In B. Dervin & M. Voight (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences (pp. 287-310). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
308. Small, H. G. (1986). The synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 97-110.
309. Small, H. G. (1997). Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces. Scientometrics, 38(2), 275-293.
310. Small, H. G. (1998). A general framework for creating large-scale maps of science in two or three dimensions: The SciViz system. Scientometrics, 41(1), 125-133.
311. Small, H. G. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(9), 799-813.
312. Small, H. G. (2004). On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics, 60(1), 71-79.
313. Small, H. G., & Crane, D. (1979). Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: An examination of their structure using citation indexes. Scientometrics, 1(5-6), 445-461.
314. Small, H. G., & Greenlee, E. (1980). Citation context analysis of a co-citation cluster: Recombinant DNA. Scientometrics, 2(4), 277-301.
315. Small, H. G., & Greenlee, E. (1989). A co-citation study of AIDS research. Communication Research, 16(5), 642-666.
316. Small, H. G., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literature I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4, 17-40.
317. Small, H. G., & Sweeney, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations I: A comparison of methods. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 391-409.
318. Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). Works as signs, symbols and canons: The epistemology of the work. Knowledge Organization, 28, 192-202.
319. Smiraglia, R. P. (2002a). Further reflections on the nature of "a work": An introduction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 33(3/4), 1-11.
320. Smiraglia, R. P. (2002b). The progress of theory in knowledge organization. Library Trends, 50 (3), 530-549.
321. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
322. Solomon, M. (1994). Multivariate models of scientific change. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (vol. 2), 287-297.
323. Stahl, W. A., Campbell, R. A., Petry, Y., & Diver, G. (2002). Webs of reality: Social perspectives on science and religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
324. Stewart, J. A. (1983). Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces, 62(1), 166-189.
325. Stokes, T. D., & Hartley, A. J. (1989). Coauthorship, social structure and influence within specialties. Social Studies of Science, 19(1), 101-125.
326. Storer, N. W. (1966). The social system of science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
327. Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38.
328. Svenonius, E. (2004). The epistemological foundations of knowledge representations. Library Trends, 52(3), 571-587.
329. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
330. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
331. Swanson, D. R. (1986). Undiscovered public knowledge. Library Quarterly, 56(2), 103-118.
332. Swanson, D. R. (1987). Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38, 228-233.
333. Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
334. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Boyce, P., & Grayson, M. (2005). Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 786-802.
335. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 81-135.
336. Thompson, P. (2005). Text mining, names and security. Journal of Database Management, 16(1), 54-59.
337. Tillett, B. B. (1991). A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35(2), 150-158.
338. Tillett, B. B. (2001). Bibliographical relationships. In C. A. Bean & R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 19-35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
339. Toulmin, S. E. (1970). Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water? In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 39-50). New York: Cambridge University Press.
340. Tsay, M. Y., Xu, H., & Wu, C. W. (2003). Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 57(1), 7-25.
341. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), 419-427.
342. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press.
343. Valente, T. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1995). The origins and development of the diffusion of innovations paradigm as an example of scientific growth. Science Communication, 16(3), 242-273.
344. Van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (1996). Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(6), 415-436.
345. Van der Veer Martens, B., & Goodrum, A. (2006). The diffusion of theories: A functional approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 330-341.
346. Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information Storage & Retrieval, 10, 189-196.
347. White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
348. White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.
349. White, H. D. (2004a). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r: Reply. Journal of the American Society for Information Society and Technology, 55(9), 843.
350. White, H. D. (2004b). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.
351. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-172.
352. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1982). Authors as markers of intellectual space: Cocitation in studies of science, technology, and society. Journal of Documentation, 38(4), 255-272.
353. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-186.
354. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99-168.
355. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-356.
356. Whitley, R. (1972). Black boxism and the sociology of science: A discussion of the major developments in the field. Sociology Review Monographs, 18, 61-92.
357. Whitley, R. (1976). Umbrella and polytheistic scientific disciplines and their elites. Social Studies of Science, 6(3/4), 471-497.
358. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
359. Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographic control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
360. Woolgar, S. W. (1976). The identification and definition of scientific collectivities. In G. Lemaine, R. Macleod, M. Mulkay, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines (pp. 233-245). Chicago: Aldine.
361. Wouters, P. D. (1999). The citation culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
362. Wray, W. B. (2005). Rethinking scientific specialization. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 151-164.
363. Yitzhaki, M., & Hammerschlag, G. (2004). Accessibility and use of information sources among computer scientists and software engineers in Israel: Academy versus industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(9), 832-842.
364. Zehr, S. C. (1999). Scientists' representations of uncertainty. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 3-21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
365. Zhao, D. Z., & Logan, E. (2002). Citation analysis using scientific publications on the Web as data source: A case study in the XML research area. Scientometrics, 54(3), 449-472.
366. Ziman, J. M. (1968). Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
367. Ziman, J. M. (1969). Information, communication, knowledge. Nature, 224, 318-324.
368. Ziman, J. M. (1984). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
369. Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 156-168.
370. Zuckerman, H. (1970). Stratification in American science. Sociological Inquiry, 40, 235-257.
371. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.
372. Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9, 66-100.