Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 327-355

  White, Howard D ^a   McCain, Katherine W ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CO CITATION ANALYSIS (ACA); EXTENSIVE DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032047559     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-W     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aversa, E. (1985). Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7, 383-389.
2. Bayer, A. E., Smart, J. C., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield [sociology of the family] through author co-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 444-452.
3. Beghtol, C. (1995). Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 30-44.
4. Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Borgman, C. L. (Ed.). (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Borko, H. (1968). The conceptual foundations of information systems. In E. B. Montgomery (Ed.), The foundations of access to knowledge: A symposium. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
7. Buckland, M. (1991). Information retrieval of more than text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 586-588.
8. Buckland, M. (1996). Documentation, information science, and library science in the U.S.A. Information Processing & Management, 32, 63-76.
9. Buckland, M. K., & Liu, Z. (1995). History of information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 30, 385-416.
10. Cozzens, S. E. (1985). Comparing the sciences - Citation context analysis of papers from neuropharmacology and the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 15, 127-153.
11. Croft, W. B. (1996). Remarks at Information Retrieval 2000: Workplace Needs and Curricular Implications: Symposium sponsored by College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, May 24, 1996.
12. De Mey, M. (1982). The cognitive paradigm. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
13. Eom, S. B. (1996). Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision support systems through author co-citation analysis. Decision Support Systems, 16, 315-338.
14. Gorman, M. (1990). A bogus and dismal science, or the eggplant that ate library schools. American Libraries, 21, 462-463.
15. Griffith, B. C. (Ed.). (1980). Key papers in information science. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.
16. Harter, S. P. (1992). Psychological relevance and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 602-615.
17. Hayes, R. M. (1985). The history of library and information science: A commentary. Journal of Library History, 20, 173-178.
18. Hoffman, D. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research - A bibliometric study of author co-citations in the 1 st 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 505-517.
19. Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 400-425.
20. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Information and information science in context. In J. Olaisen, E. Munch-Petersen, & P. Wilson (Eds.), Information science: From the development of the discipline to social interaction (pp. 69-111). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
21. Kantor, P. B. (1981). Rigorous solution of the competitive advantage problem - Application to bibliometric problems. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 18, 282-284.
22. Kantor, P. B. (1994). Information retrieval techniques. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29, 53-90.
23. Karki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines - An author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22, 323-334.
24. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Lancaster, F. W., Bushur, S., & Low, Y. M. (1993). Kochen influence examined bibliometrically. Library Trends, 41, 549-566.
26. Machlup, F., & Mansfield, U. (Eds.). (1983). The study of information: interdisciplinary messages. New York: Wiley.
27. Martyn, J. (1974). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 9, 3-23.
28. Martyn, J. (1975). Progress in documentation: Citation analysis. Journal of Documentation, 31, 290-297.
29. McCain, K. W. (1986). Co-cited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure [in macroeconomics and drosophila genetics]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 111-122.
30. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433-443.
31. McKenzie, D. F. (1986). Bibliography and the sociology of texts. London: British Library.
32. Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in American sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
33. Olaisen, J., Munch-Petersen, E., & Wilson, P. (Eds.). (1996). Information science: From the development of the discipline to social interaction. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
34. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 31-38.
35. Rayward, W. B. (1996). The history and historiography of information science: Some reflections. Information Processing & Management, 32, 3-17.
36. Rikken, F., Kiers, H., & Vos, R. (1995). Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug-reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL. Scientometrics, 33, 367-380.
37. Saito, Y. (1984). Identification of the specialties in library and information science using co-citation analysis. Library and Information Science, 22, 61-74.
38. Saracevic, T. (1992). Information science: Origin, evolution, relations. In P. Vakkari & B. Cronin (Eds.), Conceptions of library and information science: Historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 5-27). London: Taylor Graham.
39. Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
40. Small, H. G. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36, 183-196.
41. Small, H. G. (1981). The relationship of information science to the social sciences: A co-citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 17, 39-50.
42. Small, H. G. (1993). Macro-level changes in the structure of co-citation clusters: 1983-1989. Scientometrics, 26, 5-20.
43. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
44. Sparck Jones, K. (Ed.). (1981). Information retrieval experiment. London: Butterworth.
45. SPSS Base System User's Guide (1990; also later eds.) Chicago: Marija J. Norusis/SPSS.
46. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1981). The success-breeds-success phenomenon and bibliometric processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 280-286.
47. Tudjman, M., Tudor-Silovic, N., Boras, D., & Milas-Bracovic, M. (1988). A literature measure of scientific communication: Co-citation analysis of masters theses in information sciences in Yugoslavia, 1961-1984. In N. Tudor-Silovic, & I. Mihel (Eds.), Information research; research methods in library and information science (pp. 225-247). London: Taylor Graham.
48. Vakkari, P. (1996). Library and information science: Content and scope. In J. Olaisen, E. Munch-Petersen, & P. Wilson (Eds.), Information science: From the development of the discipline to social interaction (pp. 169-231). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
49. Vakkari, P., & Cronin, B. (Eds.). (1992). Conceptions of library and information science: Historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives. London: Taylor Graham.
50. Vickery, B. C., & Vickery, A. (1987). Information science in theory and practice. London: Butterworths.
51. White, H. D. (1990a). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. White, H. D. (1990b). Introduction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 430-431.
53. White, H. D. (1992). External memory. In H. D. White, M. J. Bates, & P. Wilson, For information specialists; interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (pp. 249-294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-172.
55. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1982). Authors as markers of intellectual space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology and society. Journal of Documentation, 38, 255-272.
56. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-186.
57. Williams, J. G., Sochats, K. M., & Morse, E. (1995). Visualization. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 30, 161-207.
58. Wilson, P. (1983). Bibliographical R&D. In F. Machlup & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The study of information; interdisciplinary messages (pp. 389-397). New York: Wiley.
59. Wilson, P. (1996). The future of research in our field. In J. Olaisen, E. Munch-Petersen, & P. Wilson (Eds.), Information science: From the development of the discipline to social interaction (pp. 319-323). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.