The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations

Research Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 109-123

  Etzkowitz, Henry ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b 1018 WV ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Innovation; Mode 2; Triple helix; University industry government relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000834621     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alchian A.A. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy. 58:1950;211-222.
2. Andersen, E.S., 1994. Evolutionary Economics: Post-Schumpeterian Contributions. Pinter, London.
3. Arthur, W.B., 1988. Competing technologies. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 590-607.
4. Barras R. Interactive innovation in financial and business services: the vanguard of the service revolution. Research Policy. 19:1990;215-237.
5. Ben David J., Collins R. Social factors in the origins of new science: the case of psychology. American Sociological Review. 3:1966;45-85.
6. Benner, M., Sandström, U., this issue. Institutionalizing the Triple Helix: research funding and norms in the academic system, Research Policy.
7. Berman, M., 1982. All that is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. Simon and Schuster, New York.
8. Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (Eds.), Regional Innovation Systems. University College London Press, London.
9. Bruckner, E., Ebeling, W., Jiménez Montaño, M.A., Scharnhorst, A., 1994. Hyperselection and innovation described by a stochastic model of technological evolution. In: Leydesdorff, L., Van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies. Pinter, London, pp. 79-90.
10. Bush, V., 1980. The Endless Frontier: A Report to the President, reprinted by Arno Press, New York (1945).
11. Callon, M., 1998. An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. In: Callon, M. (Ed.), The Laws of the Market. Macmillan, London, pp. 244-269.
12. Cowan, R., Foray, D., 1997. The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge. MERIT, Maastricht.
13. Cozzens, S., Healey, P., Rip, A., Ziman, J. (Eds.), 1990. The Research System in Transition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
14. Dasgupta P., David P. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy. 23:1994;487-522.
15. David, P.A., Foray, D., 1994. Dynamics of competitive technology diffusion through local network structures: the case of EDI document standards. In: Leydesdorff, L., Van den Besselaar P. (Eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies. Pinter, London, pp. 63-78.
16. Etzkowitz, H., 1999. Bridging the gap: the evolution of industry-university links in the United States. In: Branscomb, L., Kodama, F. (Eds.), Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Etzkowitz, H., forthcoming. The Second Academic Revolution: MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Gordon & Breach, London.
18. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The triple helix-university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review. 14(1):1995;14-19.
19. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.), 1997. Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
20. Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M., Levitt, J., 2000. Public Venture Capital: Government Funding Sources for Technology Entrepreneurs. Harcourt-Brace, New York.
21. Freeman, C., 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter, London.
22. Freeman, C., Perez, C., 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 38-66.
23. Frenken, K., this issue. A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997). Research Policy.
24. Frenken, K., Leydesdorff, L., forthcoming. Scaling trajectories in civil aircraft (1913-1997). Research Policy.
25. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.
26. Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.
27. Godin B. Writing performative history: is this a new Atlantis? Social Studies of Science. 38(3):1998;465-483.
28. Godin, B., Gingras, Y., this issue. The Place of Universities in the System of Knowledge Production. Research Policy.
29. Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable GUIRR, 1998. National Science and Technology Strategies in a Global Context. Report of an International Symposium. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
30. Gustin, B., 1975. The emergence of the German chemical profession, 1790-1867. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
31. Hughes, T.P., 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification of Western Society 1880-1930. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
32. Kaghan, W.N., Barnett, G.B., 1997. The desktop model of innovation. In: Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.), Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London, pp. 71-81.
33. Kampmann, C., Haxholdt, C., Mosekilde, E., Sterman, J.D., 1994. Entrainment in a disaggregated long-wave model. In: Leydesdorff, L., Van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies. Pinter, London, pp. 109-124.
34. Langton, C.G. (Ed.), 1989. Artificial Life. Addison Wesley, Redwood City, CA.
35. Leydesdorff, L., 1995. The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-organization of Scientific Communications. DSWO Press, Leiden University, Leiden.
36. Leydesdorff L. The non-linear dynamics of sociological reflections. International Sociology. 12:1997;25-45.
37. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy. 23:1996;279-286.
38. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy. 25(3):1998;195-203.
39. Leydesdorff L., Oomes N. Is the European monetary system converging to integration? Social Science Information. 38(1):1999;57-86.
40. Leydesdorff L., Van den Besselaar P. Scientometrics and communication theory: towards theoretically informed indicators. Scientometrics. 38:1997;155-174.
41. Leydesdorff, L., Van den Besselaar, P., 1998. Competing technologies: lock-ins and lock-outs. In: Dubois, D.M. (Ed.), Computing Anticipatory Systems, Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics 437. American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, pp. 309-323.
42. Luhmann, N., 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main). [Social Systems (Stanford University Press, Stanford) 1995].
43. Lundvall, B.-Å., 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi, G. Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 349-369.
44. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.), 1992. National Systems of Innovation. Pinter, London.
45. MacLane S. Should universities imitate industry? American Scientist. 84(6):1996;520-521.
46. Maturana, H.R., 1978. Biology of language: the epistemology of reality. In: Miller, G.A., Lenneberg, E. (Eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York, pp. 27-63.
47. McKelvey, M.D., 1996. Evolutionary Innovations: The Business of Biotechnology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
48. Merton, R.K., 1938. Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England. Sainte Catherine Press, Burges.
49. Merton R.K. Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology. 1:1942;115-126.
50. Mills, C.W., 1958. The Power Elite. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
51. Mowery D.C., Rosenberg N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some empirical studies. Research Policy. 8:1979;102-153.
52. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1982. Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis. Pergamon, New York.
53. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Study. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
54. Nelson, R.R., 1994. Economic growth via the coevolution of technology and institutions. In: Leydesdorff, L., Van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies. Pinter, London, pp. 21-32.
55. Nelson R., Winter S. Growth theory from an evolutionary perspective: the differential productivity growth puzzle. American Economic Review. 65:1975;338.
56. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Neurath, O., Carnap, R., Hahn, H., 1929. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung-Der Wiener Kreis. Veröffentlichungen des Vereins Ernst Mach, Vienna.
58. OECD, 1980. Technical Change and Economic Policy. OECD, Paris.
59. Pasinetti, L., 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
60. Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a theory and a taxonomy. Research Policy. 13:1984;343-373.
61. Rip A., VanderMeulen B. The post-modern research system. Science and Public Policy. 23(6):1996;343-352.
62. Rosenberg N., Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy. 23:1994;323-348.
63. Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W., 1981. Industrial Innovation and Public Policy. Pinter, London.
64. Sábato, J., 1975. El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia-technología-desarrollo-dependencia. Paidós, Buenos Aires.
65. Sábato, Jorge, Mackenzi, M., 1982. La Producción de Technología. Autónoma o Transnacional. Nueva Imagen, Mexico.
66. Schumpeter, J., 1964. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill, New York [1939].
67. Schumpeter, J., 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
68. Sobel, D., 1995. Longitude. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
69. Storr, R., 1953. The Beginnings of Graduate Education in America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
70. Weingart P. From "Finalization" to "Mode 2": old wine in new bottles? Social Science Information. 36(4):1997;591-613.
71. Ziman, J., 1994. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.