Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study

Scientometrics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 377-393

  Van Den Besselaar, Peter ^a,b   Heimeriks, Gaston ^c  

^a Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746466987     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0118-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. BHATTACHARYA, S., BASU, P. K. (1998), Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 43: 359-372.
2. BRAAM, R. R., MOED, H. F., VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (1991a), Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I: Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42: 233-251.
3. BRAAM, R. R., MOED, H. F., VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (1991b), Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42: 252-266.
4. CALLON, M., LAW, J., RIP, A. (1986), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: MacMillan.
5. CHEN, C. (2003), Mapping Scientific Frontiers. Springer
6. COURTIAL, J. P. (1994), A coword analysis of scientometrics, Scientometrics, 31: 251-260.
7. COZZENS, S. E., LEYDESDORFF, L. (1993). Journal systems as macro-indicators of structural change in the sciences. In: A. F. J. VAN RAAN, R. E. DE BRUIN, H. F. MOED, A. J. NEDERHOF, R. W. J. TIJSSEN (Eds), Science and Technology in a Policy Context, Leiden: DSWO/Leiden University Press, pp. 219-233.
8. HEIMERIKS, G. (2005), Knowledge Production and Communication in the Information Society. Mapping Communications in Heterogeneous Research Networks. Unpublished PhD thesis University of Amsterdam.
9. HEIMERIKS, G., VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P. (2005), Mapping research topics through word-reference cooccurrences. In: P. INGWERSEN, B. LARSEN (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2005. Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, pp. 575-584.
10. HEIMERIKS, G., VAN SOMEREN, M., VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P. (submitted), Structure and development of AI: a bibliometric analysis.
11. KESSLER, M. M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14: 10-25.
12. KING, J. (1987), A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13: 261-276.
13. KOPCSA, A., SCHIEBEL, E. (2000), Science and technology mapping: A new iteration model for representing multidimensional relationships. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 7-17.
14. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1997), Why words and co-words cannot measure the development of the sciences. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 48: 418-427.
15. MARSHAKOVA, I. V. (1973), A system of document connection based on references. Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VINITI, 6 (2): 3-8.
16. MCCAIN, K. W. (1990), Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41: 433-443.
17. MOED, H. F., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHMOCH, U. (Eds) (2004), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
18. NOYONS, E. C. M. (1999), Bibliometric Mapping as a Science Policy and Research Management Tool. Leiden: DSWO Press.
19. NOYONS, E. C. M., VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (1998), Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective; Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 68-81.
20. PERSSON, O. (1994), The intellectual base and research front of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 31-38.
21. PETERS, H. P. F., VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (1993), Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part 1: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling. Research Policy, 22: 23-45.
22. RIP, A. (1988), Mapping of science, possibilities and limitations. In: A. F. J. VAN RAAN (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 253-273.
23. SHIFFRIN, R. M., BÖRNER, K. (Eds) (2004), Mapping Knowledge Domains. Supplement of PNAS 101 (April 6, 2004)
24. SMALL, H. (1973), Co-citation in scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24: 265-269.
25. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P. (2000), Communication between science and technology studies journals: A case study in differentiation and integration in scientific fields. Scientometrics, 47: 169-193.
26. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P. (2001), The cognitive and the social structure of Science and Technology Studies. Scientometrics, 51: 441-460.
27. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P., HEIMERIKS, G. (2000), Codification and Self-Organization in the European STI System, (Deliverable 2.6 - SOEIS project). University of Amsterdam.
28. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P., Heimeriks, G. (2001), Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary: Concepts and indicators. In: M. DAVIS, C. S. WILSON (Eds), Proceedings 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics - ISSI2001. Sydney: UNSW, pp. 705-716.
29. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P., LEYDESDORFF, L. (1996), Mapping change in scientific specialties; a scientometric case study of the development of artificial intelligence, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 47: 415-436.
30. WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K W. (1989), Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24: 119-186.
31. WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K. W. (1997), Visualization of literatures, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32: 99-168.
32. WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K. W. (1998), Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 327-356.