Authors as citers over time

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 87-108

  White, Howard D ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION THEORY;

CITATION IDENTITY; CITATION THEORY; CORE AND SCATTER DISTRIBUTION; IDIOSYNCRASIES; RECITATION ANALYSIS; RECITATION PATTERNS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 0035127992     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1542>3.0.CO;2-T     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63, 829-846.
2. Bavelas, J.B. (1978). The social psychology of citations. Canadian Psychological Review, 19, 158-163.
3. Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox; an essay on Tolstoy's view of history. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4. Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 208-216.
5. Bonzi, S., & Snyder, H.W. (1991). Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citations to others. Scientometrics, 21, 245-254.
6. Broadus, R.N. (1983). An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 132-135.
7. Brooks, T.A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 223-229.
8. Brooks, T.A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 34-36.
9. Brooks, T.A. (1988). Citer motivations. In A. Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (vol. 43). New York: Dekker.
10. Budd, J.M. (1999). Citations and knowledge claims: Sociology of knowledge as a case in point. Journal of Information Science, 25, 265-274.
11. Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 284-290.
12. Chubin, D.E., & Moitra, S.D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5, 423-441.
13. Cole, J., & Cole, S. (1971). Measuring the quality of sociological research: Problems in the use of the Science Citation Index. American Sociologist, 6, 23-29.
14. Cole, J.R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Cole, J.R., & Cole, S. (1987). Testing the Ortega hypothesis: Milestone or millstone? Scientometrics, 12, 345-353.
16. Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies; A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
17. Cooper. W.S. (1978). Foundations of logico-linguistics: A unified theory of information, language, and logic (Synthese Language Library, vol. 2). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
18. Cozzens, S.E. (1982). Split citation identity: A case study from economics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 233-236.
19. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process; The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
20. Cronin, B. (1994). Tiered citation and measures of document similarity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 537-538.
21. Davies, D. (1970). Letter to the editor. Nature, 228, 1356.
22. Dimitroff, A., & Arlitsch, K. (1995). Self-citations in the library and information science literature. Journal of Documentation, 51, 44-56.
23. Frost, C.O. (1979). The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly, 49, 399-414.
24. Garfield, E. (1997). Validation of citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 962.
25. Gilbert, G.N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113-122.
26. Harter, S.P. (1992). Psychological relevance and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 602-615.
27. Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29, 308-310.
28. Hicks, D., & Potter, J. (1991). Sociology of scientific knowledge: A reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science. Social Studies of Science, 21, 459-501.
29. Hooten, P.A. (1991). Frequency and functional use of cited documents in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 397-404.
30. Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16, 179-184.
31. Kaufmann, W. (1960). From Shakespeare to existentialism; A new edition with additions. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, [see ch. 7, The Hegel Myth and Its Method.]
32. Law, J., & Williams, R. (1982). Putting facts together: A study in scientific persuasion. Social Studies of Studies, 12, 535-558.
33. Lawani, S.M. (1982). On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 281-284.
34. Lawani, S.M. (1987). The Ortega hypothesis, individual differences, and cumulative advantage. Scientometrics, 12, 321-323.
35. Liu, M. (1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49, 370-408.
36. Lovaglia, M. (1991). Predicting citations to journal articles: The ideal number of references. American Sociologist, 22, 49-64.
37. MacRoberts, M. (1997). Rejoinder. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 963.
38. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1984). The negational reference: Or the art of dissembling. Social Studies of Science, 14, 91-94.
39. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1986). Quantitative measure of communication in science: A study of the formal level. Social Studies of Science, 16, 151-172.
40. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1987). Testing the Ortega hypothesis - Facts and artifacts. Scientometrics, 12, 293-295.
41. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 342-349.
42. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36, 435-444.
43. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1997). Citation content analysis of a botany journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 274-275.
44. Martyn, J. (1975). Citation analysis. Journal of Documentation, 31, 290-297.
45. McCain, K.W., & Turner, K. (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17, 127-163.
46. Moed, H.F., & Vriens, M. (1989). Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 15, 95-107.
47. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology; Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
48. Nederhof, A.J., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1987). Citation theory and the Ortega hypothesis. Scientometrics, 12, 325-328.
49. O'Connor, J. (1982) Citing statements: Computer recognition and use to improve retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 18, 125-131.
50. Paisley, W. (1968). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (vol. 3, pp. 1-30). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
51. Peters, H.F.P., Braam, R.R., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1995). Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 9-21.
52. Poole, H. (1985). Theories of the middle range. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53. Rousseau, R. (1992). Why am I not cited or why are multiauthored papers more cited than others? Journal of Documentation 48:79-80.
54. Sandstrom, P.E. (1998). Information foraging among anthropologists in the invisible college of human behavioral ecology: An author co-citation analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University.
55. Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump; Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B. Dervin & M.J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (vol. 3, pp. 287-310). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57. Small, H. (1987). The significance of bibliographic references. Scientometrics, 12, 339-341.
58. Small, H.G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
59. Smith, G.W. (1991). Computers and human language. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
61. Snizek, W.E. (1987). In search of influence: The testing of the Ortega hypothesis. Scientometrics, 12, 311-314.
62. Sparck Jones, K (Ed.). (1981). Information retrieval experiment. London: Butterworths.
63. Sparck Jones, K. (1992). Natural language processing: An overview. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 3, 54-59. New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Spasser, M.A. (1997). The enacted fate of undiscovered public knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 707-712.
65. Stewart, J.A. (1990). Drifting continents and colliding paradigms; Perspectives on the geoscience revolution (pp. 216-238). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
66. Swales, J. (1986). Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 7, 39-56.
67. Tagliacozzo, R. (1977). Self-citations in scientific literature. Journal of Documentation 33:251-265.
68. Thorne, F.C. (1977). Citation index - Another case of spurious validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 1157-1161.
69. Vinkler, P. (1998). Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing: The reference threshold model. Scientometrics, 43, 107-127.
70. Voos, H., & Dagaev, K.S. (1976). Are all citations equal? Or, did we Op. Cit. Your Idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1, 19-21.
71. Wang, P., & White, M.D. (1999). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 98-114.
72. White, H.D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
73. White, H.D. (1992a). Publication and bibliographic statements. In H.D. White, M.J. Bates, & P. Wilson, For information specialists; Interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (pp. 81-116). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
74. White, H.D. (1992b). Literary forms in information work. In H.D. White, M.J. Bates, and P. Wilson, For information specialists; Interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (pp. 131-149). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
75. White, H.D. (1994). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds.). Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 41-55). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
76. White, H.D. (1996). Literature retrieval for interdisciplinary syntheses. Library Trends, 45, 239-264.
77. White, H.D. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In Blaise Cronin & Helen B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Information Today/ASIS (in press).
78. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (vol. 24, pp. 119-186). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
79. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99-168.
80. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355.
81. White, M.D., & Wang, P. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67, 122-154.
82. Wilson, P. (1977). Public knowledge, private ignorance; Toward a library and information policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
83. Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge; An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
84. Wilson, P. (1992). Pragmatic bibliography. In H.D. White, M.J. Bates, and P. Wilson, For information specialists; Interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (pp. 239-246). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
85. Zuckerman, H. (1987). Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12, 329-338.