Scholarly communication as a socioecological system

Scientometrics

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 573-605

  Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000652498     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1019655305286     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. BATES, M. J. (1996), Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students, Library Trends, 45(2): 155-164.
2. BERNARD, H. R. (1988), Research Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
3. BLURTON JONES, N. G. (1990), Three sensible paradigms for research on evolution and human behavior?, Ethology and Sociobiology, 11: 353-359.
4. BORGERHOFF MULDER, M. (1991), Human behavioural ecology, In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd ed., J. R. KREBS, N. B. DAVIES (Eds), Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 69-98.
5. CRANE, D. (1970), The nature of scientific communication and influence, International Social Science Journal, 22(1): 28-41.
6. CRONIN, B., HERT C. A. (1995), Scholarly foraging and network discovery tools, Journal of Documentation, 51(4): 388-403.
7. CRONK, L. (1991), Human behavioral ecology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 25-53.
8. DURHAM, W. H. (1990), Advances in evolutionary culture theory, Annual Review of Anthropology, 19: 187-210.
9. ELLIS, D. (1989), A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design, Journal of Documentation, 45(3): 171-212.
10. GARVEY, W. D., GRIFFITH, B. C. (1967), Scientific communication as a social system, Science, 157: 1011-1116.
11. GARVEY, W. D., GRIFFITH B. C. (1971), Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge, American Psychologist, 26(4): 349-362.
12. GRANOVETTER, M. S. (1973), The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
13. GRIFFITH, B. C. (1989), Understanding science: Studies of communication and information, Communication Research, 16(5): 600-614; Also in: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. BORGMAN (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 31-45.
14. GRIFFITH, B. C. (1989), Understanding science: Studies of communication and information, Communication Research, 16(5): 600-614; Also in: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. BORGMAN (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 31-45.
15. GRIFFITH, B. C., MULLINS, N. C. (1972), Coherent social groups in scientific change, Science, 177: 959-964.
16. GRIFFITH, B. C., SMALL, H. G., STONEHILL, J. A., DEY, S. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro-and microstructure for science, Science Studies, 4: 339-365.
17. HARPENDING, H., ROGERS, A., DRAPER, P. (1987), Human sociobiology, Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 30: 127-150.
18. HØRLAND, B., ALBRECHTSEN, H. (1995), Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6): 400-425.
19. LIEVROUW, L. A., ROGERS, E. M., LOWE, C. U., NADEL, E. (1987), Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists, Social Networks, 9: 217-248.
20. MCCAIN, K. W. (1986), Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3): 111-122.
21. MCCAIN, K. W. (1990a), Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 433-443.
22. MCCAIN, K. W. (1990b), Mapping authors in intellectual space: Population genetics in the 1980s. In: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. BORGMAN (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 194-216.
23. MULLINS, N. C., HARGENS, L., HECHT, P. K., KICK, E. L. (1977), The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study, American Sociological Review, 42: 552-562.
24. PIROLLI, P., CARD, S. (1999), Information foraging, Psychological Review, 106(4): 643-675.
25. ROWLANDS, I. (1999), Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure, Scientometrics, 44(3): 533-546.
26. SANDSTROM, P. E. (1994), An optimal foraging approach to information seeking and use, Library Quarterly, 64(4): 414-449.
27. SANDSTROM, P. E. (1998), Information foraging among anthropologists in the invisible college of human behavioral ecology: An author co-citation analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
28. SANDSTROM, P. E. (1999), Scholars as subsistence foragers, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(3): 17-20.
29. SMALL, H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24: 265-269.
30. SMALL, H.. (1978), Cited documents as concept symbols, Social Studies of Science, 8: 327-340.
31. SMALL, H., GRIFFITH, B. C. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties, Science Studies, 4: 17-40.
32. SMITH, E. A. (1983), Anthropological applications of optimal foraging theory: A critical review, Current Anthropology, 24(5): 625-651.
33. SMITH, E. A. (1992a), Human behavioral ecology: I, Evolutionary Anthropology, 1(1): 20-25.
34. SMITH, E. A. (1992b), Human behavioral ecology: II, Evolutionary Anthropology, 1(2): 50-53.
35. SMITH, E. A., WINTERHALDER, B. (Eds) (1992), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
36. SOPER, M. E. (1976), Characteristics and use of personal collections, Library Quarterly, 26(4): 397-415.
37. WHITE, H. D. (1981), "Bradfordizing" search output: How it would help online users, Online Review, 5(1): 47-54.
38. WHITE, H. D. (1986), Cocited author retrieval, Information Technology and Libraries, 5: 93-99.
39. WHITE, H. D. (1990), Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. BORGMAN (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 84-106.
40. WHITE, H. D. (1996), Literature retrieval for interdisciplinary syntheses, Library Trends, 45(2): 239-264.
41. WHITE, H. D., GRIFFITH, B. C. (1981), Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3): 163-171.
42. WHITE, H. D., GRIFFITH, B. C. (1982), Authors as markers of intellectual space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology, and society, Journal of Documentation, 38(4): 255-272.
43. WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K. W. (1989) Bibliometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24: 119-186.
44. WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K. W. (1997), Visualization of literatures, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32: 99-168.
45. WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K. W. (1998), Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4): 327-355.
46. WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K. W. (2000), In memory of Belver C. Griffith, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(10): 959-962.
47. WILSON, P. (1977), Private Knowledge, Public Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
48. WILSON, P. (1992), Searching: Strategies and evaluation. In: For Information Professionals: Interpretations of Reference and Bibliographic Work, H. D. WHITE, M. J. BATES, P. WILSON, Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corp., 153-182.
49. WILSON, P. (1995), Unused relevant information in research and development, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1): 45-51.
50. WILSON, P. (1996), Interdisciplinary research and information overload, Library Trends, 45(2): 192-203.
51. WILSON, P., FARID, M. (1979), On the use of the records of research, Library Quarterly, 49(2): 127-145.
52. WINTERHALDER, B., SMITH, E. A. (1981), Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. WINTERHALDER, B., SMITH, E. A. (2000), Analyzing adaptive strategies: Human behavioral ecology at twenty-five, Evolutionary Anthropology, 9(2): 51-72.