The progress of theory in knowledge organization

Library Trends

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 330-349

  Smiraglia, Richard P ^a  

^a LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044533428     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. nd ed. rev. Chicago: American Library Association.
2. th International ISKO Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada). Advances in knowledge organization (vol. 7, pp. 313-319). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
3. Beghtol, C. (2001). The concept of genre and its characteristics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 27(2), 1-5.
4. Carpenter, M. (1981). Corporate authorship: Its role in library cataloging, Westport: Greenwood Press.
5. Chaplin, A. H., & Anderson, D. (Eds.) ([1961] 1981). International Conference on Cataloguing Principles Report. London: IFLA International Office for UBC.
6. th annual conference of the Graduate Library School July 24-291950 (pp. 3-23). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. st ed. Washington: U. S. G. P. O.
8. th ed. Washington: U. S. G. P. O.
9. de Rijk, E. (1991). Thomas Hyde, Julia Pettee and the development of cataloging principles; With a translation of Hyde's 1674 Preface to the reader. Cataloging and Classification Quarteily, 14(2), 31-62.
10. Dewey, M. (1876). A classification and subject index for cataloguing and arranging the books and pamphlets of a library. Amherst: M. Dewey.
11. Dick, A. L. (1999). Epistemological positions and library and information science. Library Quarterly, 69, 305-323.
12. Domanovszky, A. (1974). Functions and objects of author and title cataloguing: A contribution to cataloguing theory (Anthony Thompson, Trans.). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
13. Dowell, A. T. (1982). AACR2 headings: A five-year projection of their impact on catalogs. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
14. Fidel, R., & Crandall, M. (1988). The AACR2 as a design schema for bibliographic databases. Library Quarterly, 58(2), 123-142.
15. Fuller, E. (1989). Variation in personal name headings and title page usage. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 9(3), 75-96.
16. Gorman, M. (1980). AACR2 main themes. In D. H. Clack (Ed.), Making of a code (pp. 41-52). Chicago: American Library Association.
17. Gorman, M. (1982). Authority control in the prospective catalog. In M. W. Ghikas (Ed.), Authority control: The key to tomorrow's catalog (pp. 166-180). Tucson: Oryx Press.
18. Green, R. (1996). The design of a relational database for large-scale bibliographic retrieval. Information Technology and Libraries, 15(4), 207-221.
19. Hickey, D.J. (1977). Theory of bibliographic control in libraries. Library Quarterly, 47(3), 255-273.
20. Hjørland, B. (1998). Theory and metatheory of information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 606-621.
21. Hjørland, B., & Hanne, A. (1999). An analysis of some trends in classification research. Knowledge Organization, 26(3), 131-139.
22. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records. München: K. G. Saur.
23. nd ed. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of descriptive cataloging (pp. 51-61). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
24. Leazer, G. H. (1992). An examination of data elements for bibliographic description: Toward a conceptual schema for the USMARC formats. Library Resources and Technical Services, 36, 189-208.
25. Leazer, G. H. (1993). A conceptual plan for the description and control of bibliographic works. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
26. Leazer, G. H. (1994). A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works. In D. L. Andersen, T. J. Galvin, & M. D. Giguere (Eds.), Navigating the networks (Proceedings of the ASIS mid-year meeting) (pp. 115-135). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
27. st ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, March 20-23, 1996, Bethesda, Maryland) (pp. 36-43). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
28. Leazer, G. H., & Smiraglia, R. P. (1999). Bibliographic families in the library catalog: A qualitative analysis and grounded theory. Library Resources and Technical Services, 43, 191-212.
29. Lotka, A. J. (1920). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journaf of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317-323.
30. Lubetzky, S. (1969). Principles of cataloging. Final report, phase I: Descriptive cataloging. Los Angeles: Institute for Library Research.
31. Lubetzky, S. ([1961] 1981). The function of the main entry in the alphabetical catalogue - One approach. In A. H. Chaplin & D. Anderson (Eds.), International Conference on Cataloguing Principles Report (pp. 139-143). London: IFLA International Office for UBC.
32. th International ISKO Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada). Advances in knowledge organization (vol. 7, pp. 23-27). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
33. Mai, J. E. (2000b). The subject indexing process: An investigation of problems in knowledge representation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Texas, Austin.
34. Marco, F. J. G., & Navarro, M. A. E. (1993). On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification. Knowledge Organization, 20, 126-132.
35. McCallum, S. H., & Godwin, J. L. (1981). Statistics on headings in the MARC file. Journal of Library Automation, 14(3), 194-201.
36. thInternational ISKO Conference, July 15-18, 1996, Washington, DC). Advances in knowledge organization (vol. 5, pp. 302-303). Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag.
37. Osborn, A. D. ([1961] 1981). Relation between cataloguing principles and principles applicable to other forms of bibliographical work. In International conference on cataloguing principles report (pp. 125-37). London: IFLA International Office for UBC.
38. Panizzi, A. ([1841] 1985). Rules for the compilation of the catalogue. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of descriptive cataloging (p. 314). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
39. Panizzi, A. ([1848] 1985). Mr. Panizzi to the Right Hon. the Earl of Ellesmere, British Muse um, January 29, 1848. Reprinted from Appendix to the report of the commissioner appointed to inquire into the constitution and management of the British Museum. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of descriptive cataloging (pp. 18-47). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
40. Papakhian, A. R. (1985). The frequency of personal name headings in the Indiana University Music Library card catalogs. Library Resources and Technical Services, 29(3), 273-285.
41. th International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Washington, D.C.). Advances in Knowledge Organization (vol. 5, pp. 313-319). Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag.
42. Potter, W. G. (1980). When names collide: Conflict in the catalog and AACR2. Library Resources and Technical Services, 24(1), 3-16.
43. th annual conference of the Graduate Library School July 24-29, 1950 (pp. 72-93). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Smiraglia, R. P. (1987). Bibliographic control theory and nonbook materials. In S. S. Intner & R. P. Smiraglia (Eds.), Policy and practice in bibliographic control of nonbook media (pp. 15-24). Chicago: American Library Association.
45. Smiraglia, R. P. (1992). Authority control and the extent of derivative bibliographic relationships. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.
46. nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 497-506). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
47. th International ISKO Conference, July 10-13, 2000, Toronto, Canada). Advances in knowledge organization (vol. 7, pp. 295-300). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
48. Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). The nature of a work. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
49. Smiraglia, R. P., & Leazer, G. H. (1995). Toward the bibliographic control of works: Derivative bibliographic relationships in the online union catalog. OCLC Annual Review of Research 1995. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
50. Smiraglia, R. P., & Leazer, G. H. (1999). Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 493-504.
51. Strout, R. F. (1956). The development of the catalog and cataloging codes. Library Quarterly, 26(4), 254-275.
52. Svenonius, E. (1981). Directions for research in indexing, classification and cataloging. Library Resources & Technical Services, 25(1), 88-103.
53. Svenonius, E. (1992). Bibliographic entities and their uses. In R. Bourne (Ed.), Seminar on Bibliographic Records (Proceedings of the Seminar held in Stockholm, August 15-16, 1990, sponsored by the IFLA UBCIM Programme and the IFLA Division of Bibliographic Control). UBCIM Publications, New Series (vol. 7, pp. 3-18). München: K. G. Saur.
54. Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Digital libraries and electronic publishing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Taylor, A. G. (1988). Research and theoretical considerations in authority control. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 9(3), 29-56.
56. Taylor, A. G., & Paff, B. (1986). Looking back: Implementation of AACR2. Library Quarterly, 56(3), 272-285.
57. Tillett, B. A. B. (1987). Bibliographic relationships: Toward a conceptual structure of bibliographic information used in cataloging. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
58. Vellucci, S. L. (1994). Bibliographic relationships among musical bibliographic entities: A conceptual analysis of music represented in a library catalog with a taxonomy of the relationships discovered. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
59. Vellucci, S. L. (1997). Bibliographic relationships in music catalogs. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
60. Vellucci, S. L. (1998). Bibliographic relationships. In Jean Weihs (Ed.), The principles on future of AACR (International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, October, 23-25, 1997) (pp. 105-146). Ottawa: Canadian Library Association.
61. Verona, E. ([1961] 1981). The function of the main entry in the alphabetical catalogue - A second approach. In A. H. Chaplin & D. Anderson (Eds.), International Conference on Cataloguing Principles Report (pp. 145-157). London: IFLA International Office for UBC.
62. Verona, E. ([1959] 1985). Literary unit versus bibliographical unit. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of cataloging (pp. 155-175). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
63. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99-168.
64. Wilson, P. ([1968] 1978). Two kinds of power: An essay in bibliographical control. California library reprint series. Berkeley: University of California Press.
65. Yee, M. M. (1993). Moving image works and manifestations. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.