The social act of citing: Towards new horizons in citation theory

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 40, Issue , 2003, Pages 12-20

  Nicolaisen, Jeppe ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243183025     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450400102     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Belnap, N., & Steel, T. (1976). The logic of questions and answers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Bornstein, R.F. (1991). The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(1), 138-139.
4. Brown, M.A. (1989). Diffusion. In E. Barnouw et al. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Communications (vol. 2, pp. 31-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Case, D.O., & Higgins, G.M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior?: A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(4), 635-645.
6. Chubin, D.E., & Moitra, S.D. (1975). Content analysis of references adjunct or alternative to citation counting?. Social Studies of Science, 5, 426-441.
7. Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Collins, H.M. (1986). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
9. Collins, H.M., & Pinch, T. (1994). The golem: What everyone should know about science. London: Cambridge University Press.
10. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
12. Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process. College English, 48, 527-542.
13. Garfield, E. (1983). How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it relevant? Part 2. Current Contents, 45 (November 7), 5-14.
14. Garfield, E. (1985). Uses and misuses of citation frequency. Current Contents, 43 (October 28), 3-9.
15. Garfield, E. (1997). Validation of citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 962.
16. Gieryn, T.F. (1978). Problem retention and problem change in science. Sociological Inquiry, 48, 96-115.
17. Gilbert, G.N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113-133.
18. Grafton, A. (1997). The footnote: A curious history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Hargens, L.L. (2000a). Graphing micro-regions in the web of knowledge: A comparative reference-network analysis. In B. Cronin, & H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 497-516). Medford, NJ: ASIS.
20. Hargens, L.L. (2000b). Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review, 65, 846-865.
21. Hjørland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information Science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
22. Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257-270.
23. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.
24. Kuhn, T.S. ([1962] 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27. Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method, and evidence. Oxford: Westview Press.
28. Merton, R.K. ([1938] 1970). Science, technology, and society in seventeenth-century England. New York, NY: Howard Fertig.
29. Mustelin, O. (1988). Källhänvisningar och fotnoter i svenskspräkiga Åbodissertationer under 1700-talet [References and notes in Swedish-language dissertations from Abo in the period 1700-1799]. In E. Kolding Nielsen et al. (Eds.), Boger, biblioteker, mennesker: Et nordisk festskrift tilegnet Torben Nielsen Universitetsbiblioteket i Kobenhavn (pp. 105-126). Kobenhavn: Del kgl. Bibliotek i samarbejde med Det danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.
30. Nickles, T. (1981). What is a problem that we may solve it?. Synthese, 47, 85-118.
31. Nicolaisen, J. (2002). The J-shaped distribution of citedness. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 383-395.
32. Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from?: An intellectual history. Written Communication, 10(3), 267-333.
33. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
34. Shapin, S. (1995). Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 289-321.
35. Small, H. (1987). The significance of bibliographic references. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 339-341.
36. Small, H.G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
37. Swales, J.M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston.
38. Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Tabah, A.N. (1999). Literature dynamics: Studies on growth, diffusion, and epidemics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 249-286.
40. Van Raan, A.F.J. (1998). In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much. Scientometrics, 43(1), 421-428.
41. Whitley, R. (1974). Cognitive and social institutionalization of scientific specialties and research areas. In R. Whitley (Ed.), Social processes of scientific development (pp. 69-95). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
42. Woolgar, S. (1976). Writing an intellectual history of discovery accounts. Social Studies of Science, 6, 395-422.
43. Woolgar, S. (1981). Interests and explanation in the social study of science. Social Studies of Science, 11, 365-394.
44. Zuckerman, H. (1978). Theory choice and problem choice in science. Sociological Inquiry, 48, 65-95.
45. Zuckerman, H. (1987). Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 329-338.