A bibliometric-based semi-automatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms: Parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3507, Issue , 2005, Pages 226-237

  Schneider, Jesper W ^a   Borland, Pia ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; CONTEXT SENSITIVE LANGUAGES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

BIBLIOMETRIC BASED SEMI-AUTOMATIC METHOD; CITATION CONTEXT ANALYSIS; PERIODONTOLOGY; PHRASE PARSING;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 24944485000     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11495222_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Soergel, D. (1974). Indexing languages and thesauri: construction and maintenance. Los Angeles, CA: Melville.
2. Aitchison, J., Gilchrist, A. and Bawden, D. (2000). Thesaurus construction and use: A practical manual (4th ed.). London: Aslib.
3. Blair, D.C. and Kimbrough, S. O. (2002). Exemplary documents: foundation for information retrieval design. Information Processing and Management, 38, 363-379.
4. Salton, G.and McGill, M. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: MaGraw-Hill.
5. Schneider, J.W. (2004) Verification of bibliometric methods' applicability for thesaurus construction. PhD dissertation. Aalborg: Royal School of Library and Information Science. Available: http://biblis.db.dk/ uhtbin/hvperion.exe/db.jessch04
6. Moens, M. F. (2000). Automatic indexing and abstracting of document texts. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Katz, S. (1996). Distribution of content words and phrases in text and language modelling. Natural Language Engineering, 2(1), 15-60.
8. Bookstein, A., Klein, S. T. and Raita, T. (1998). Clumping properties of content-bearing words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(2), 102-114.
9. Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327-340.
10. Garfield, E. (1974). The citation index as a subject index. Current Contents, May(18), 5-7.
11. Rees-Potter, L. K. (1989). Dynamic thesaural systems: a Bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with the application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems. Information Processing and Management, 25(6), 677-691.
12. Anick, P. G. and Vaithyanathan, S. (1997). Exploiting clustering and phrases for context-based information retrieval. Proceedings of the ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Philidelhia, PA, 1997, 314-323.
13. Schneider, J.W. & Borlund, P. (2004). Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: methodical considerations. Journal of Documentation, 60(5), 524-549.
14. Persson, O. (1994) The intellectual base and research front of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.
15. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
16. Sneath, P. and Sokal, R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy : The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
17. Sparck Jones, K. (1971). Automatic keyword classification for information retrieval. London: Butterworths.
18. Small, H. and Greenlee, E. (1980). Citation context analysis of a co-citation cluster: Recombinant DNA. Scientometrics, 2(4), 277-301.
19. Small, H. (1986). The synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 97-110.
20. Braam, R. R., Moed, H. and van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of Science by combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251.