Hierarchy of Scientific Consensus and the Flow of Dissensus over Time

Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 3-25

  Kim, Kyung Man ^a  

^a Sogang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346660246     PISSN: 00483931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/004839319602600101     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ashmore, M. 1989. The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Baigne, Brian S., and J. N. Hattiangadi. 1992. On consensus and stability in science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43:435-58.
3. Barnes, B., and S. Shapin. 1979. Natural order: Historical studies of scientific culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Bloor, D. 1982. Durkheim and Mauss revisited: Classification and sociology of knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13:267-97.
5. _. 1991. Knowledge and social imagery. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Campbell, D. T. 1989. Epistemology and methodology of the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Collins, H. 1992. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Collins, R. 1994. Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid-discovery science. Sociological Forum 9:155-77.
9. Doran, C. 1989. Jumping frames: Reflexivity and recursion in the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science 19:515-31.
10. Fuller, S. 1988. Social epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. _. 1993. Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Garfinkel, H., ed. 1986. Ethnomethodalogical studies of work. London: RKP.
13. Gilbert, G. N., and M. Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Halfpenny, P. 1988. Talking of talking, writing of writing: Some reflections on Gilbert and Mulkay's discourse analysis. Social Studies of Science 18:169-82.
15. Harré, R. 1964. Matter and method. Indianapolis: Westview.
16. Hesse, M. B. 1974. The structure of scientific inference. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Jacob, M. C. 1976. The Newtonians and the English revolution 1689-1720. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18. Kim, K. M. 1991. On the reception of Johannsen's pure line theory: Toward a sociology of scientific validity. Social Studies of Science 21:649-79.
19. _. 1992. The role of the natural world in the theory choice of scientists. Social Science Information 31:445-64
20. _. 1994a. Explaining scientific consensus: The case of Mendelian genetics. New York: Guilford.
21. _. 1994b. Natural versus normative rationality: Reassessing the strong programme in the sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science 24:391-403.
22. Kuhn, T. S. [1962] 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific fact. 2d ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Laudan, L. 1984. Science and values. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26. Lynch, M. 1992. Extending Wittgenstein: The pivotal move from epistemology to the sociology of science. In Science as practice and culture, edited by A. Pickering, 215-65. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Mandelbaum, M. 1964. Philosophy, science, and sense perceptions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28. Merton, R. K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Mulkay, M. 1969. Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural sciences. Social Research 36:22-52.
30. _. 1981. Action and belief or scientific discourse? A possible way of ending intellectual vassalage in social studies of science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11:163-72.
31. _. 1985. The word and the world: Explorations in the form of sociological paradigms. London: George Allen and Unwin.
32. _. 1988. Don Quixote's double: A self-exemplifying text. In Knowledge and reflexivity, edited by S. Woolgar, 81-100. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. Mulkay, M., and G. N. Gilbert. 1982. What is the ultimate question? Some remarks in defence of the analysis of scientific discourse. Social Studies of Science 12:309-19.
34. Norton, B. J. 1975. Biology and philosophy: The methodological foundations of biometry. Journal of the History of Biology 8:85-93.
35. Pickering, A. 1987. Forms of life: science, contingency, and Harry Collins. British Journal for the History of Science 20:213-21.
36. _. 1990. Knowledge, practice, and mere construction. Social Studies of Science 20:682-729.
37. Provine, W. B. 1971. Origins of theoretical population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Roll-Hansen, N. 1989. The crucial experiment of Wilhelm Johannsen. Biology and Philosophy 4:303-29.
39. Rudwick, M.J.S. 1985. The great Devonian controversy: The shaping of scientific knowledge among gentlemanly specialists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Shapin, S. 1979. The politics of observation: Cerebral anatomy and social interests in Edinburgh phrenology disputes. In On the margins of science: The social construction of rejected knowledge (Sociological Review Monograph 27), edited by R. Wallis, 39-78. University of Keele.
41. _. 1982. History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of Science 20:157-211.
42. _. 1984. Talking history: Reflections on discourse analysis. Isis 75:125-30.
43. Woolgar, S. 1982. Laboratory studies: The state of the art Social Studies of Science 12:481-98.
44. _. 1986. On the alleged distinction between discourse and praxis. Social Studies of Science 16:309-17.
45. _, ed. 1988. Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46. Ziman, J. 1968. Public knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.