Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus Pathfinder networks

Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFO VIS

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 67-74

  Chen, Chaomei ^a   Morris, Steven ^b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Co citation networks; Minimum spanning trees; Network evolution; Network visualization; Pathfinder networks

Indexed keywords

CO-CITATION NETWORKS; MINIMUM SPANNING TREES; NETWORK EVOLUTION; NETWORK VISUALIZATION; PATHFINDER NETWORKS;

ANIMATION; BIOLOGY; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TOPOLOGY;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 78649612624     PISSN: 1522404X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INFVIS.2003.1249010     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. AHLGREN, P., JARNEVING, B., AND ROUSSEAU, R., 2003. Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficent, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 6, 550-560.
2. ALBERT, R. AND BARABASI, A., 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 1, 47-97.
3. AN, Y., JANSSEN, J., AND MILIOS, E., 2001. Characterizing and mining the citation graph of the computer science literature, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada CS-2001-02, September 26, 2001.
4. BARABÁSI, A.-L., ALBERT, R., AND JEONG, H., 2000. Scale-free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the world-wide web, Physica A, 281, 69-77.
5. BARABÁSI, A. L., JEONG, H., NÉDA, Z., RAVASZ, E., SCHUBERT, A., AND VICSEK, T., 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations, Physica A, 311, 590-614.
6. BATAGELJ, V. AND MRVAR, A., 2001. Layouts for GD01 graph-drawing competition.
7. BRANDES, U. AND CORMAN, S. R., 2002. Visual unrolling of network evolution and the analysis of dynamic discourse. In Proceedings of IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (InfoVis '02), Boston, MA., 145-151.
8. BRANDES, U. AND WILLHALM, T., 2002. Visualization of bibliographic networks with a reshaped landscape metaphor. In Proceedings of Proc. 4th Joint Eurographics - IEEE TVCG Symp. Visualization (VisSym '02), 159-164.
9. BRANIGAN, S. AND CHESWICK, B., 1999. The effects of war on the Yugoslavian network, vol. 2003: Lumeta.
10. CARRUTHERS, J. D. A., 1992. Treatment of glabellar frown lines with cbotulinum- a exotoxin, J Dermatol Surg Onc, 18, 17.
11. CHEN, C., 1998. Generalised Similarity Analysis and Pathfinder Network Scaling, Interacting with Computers, 10, 2, 107-128.
12. CHEN, C., 2002. Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. London: Springer-Verlag.
13. CHEN, C. AND CARR, L., 1999. Visualizing the evolution of a subject domain: a case study. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization'99 Conference, 449-452.
14. CHEN, C. AND DAVIS, J., 1999. Integrating spatial, semantic, and social structures for knowledge management. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '32), Hawaii.
15. CHEN, C. AND KULJIS, J., 2003. The rising landscape: A visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 5, 435-446.
16. CHEN, C. AND PAUL, R. J., 2001. Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure, Computer, 34, 3, 65-71.
17. CHI, E., PITKOW, J., MACKINLAY, J., PIROLLI, P., GOSSWEILER, R., AND CARD, S., 1998. Visualizing the evolution of web ecologies. In Proceedings of Proceedings of CHI'98, Los Angeles, 400-407.
18. EADES, P., 1984. A heuristic for graph drawing, Congressus Numerantium, 42, 149-160.
19. FAIRCHILD, K., POLTROCK, S., AND FURNAS, G., 1988, SemNet: Threedimensional graphic representations of large knowledge bases, in Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction, R. Guidon, Ed.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 201-233.
20. HUMMON, N. P. AND DOREIAN, P., 1989. Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory, Social Networks, 11, 39-63.
21. JANKOVIC, J., 1991. Therapeutic uses of botulinum toxin, New England Journal of Medicine, 324, 1186.
22. JANKOVIC, J. AND BRIN, M. F., 1997. Botulinum toxin: historical perspective and potential new indications, Muscle Nerve Suppl, 6, S, 129-145.
23. KESSLER, M. M., 1963. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
24. Kleiberg, E., van de Wetering, H., van Wijk, J. J. 2001. Botanical visualization of huge hierarchies. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2001 (InfoVis'01). Oct 22-23, 2001. San Diego, CA. 87-94.
25. KRUMHANSL, C. L., 1978. Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similar data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density, Psychological Review, 85, 5, 445-463.
26. LAMPING, J. AND RAO, R., 1996. The hyperbolic browser: A focus plus context technique for visualizing large hierarchies, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7, 1, 33-55.
27. MORRIS, S. A., YEN, G., WU, Z., AND ASNAKE, B., 2003. Timeline visualization of research fronts, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 5, 413-422.
28. NEWMAN, M. E. J., 2001a. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks, vol. 2003: arXia:cond-mat/0104209.
29. NEWMAN, M. E. J., 2001b. The structure of scientific collaboration networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 404-409.
30. NOEL, S., CHU, C. H., AND RAGHAVAN, V., 2002. Visualization of document co-citation counts. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Visualisation, London, England, 691-696.
31. POWELL, W. W., WHITE, D. R., KOPUT, K. W., AND OWEN-SMITH, J., 2002. The evolution of a science-based industry: Dynamic analyses and network visualization of biotechnology, in http://www.fek.umu.se/dpcc/powell.pdf.
32. PRICE, D. D., 1965. Networks of scientific papers, Science, 149, 510-515.
33. ROBERTSON, G. G., MACKINLAY, J. D., AND CARD, S. K., 1991. Cone trees: Animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. In Proceedings of CHI '91, New Orleans, LA, 189-194.
34. ROSCH, E., MERVIS, C. B., GRAY, W., JOHNSON, D., AND BOYES-BRAEM, P., 1976. Basic objects in natural categories, Cognitive Psychology, 8, 336-356.
35. SALTON, G., 1989. Automatic text processing: The transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
36. SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., 1990. Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization, in Ablex Series in Computational Sciences, D. Partridge, Ed. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporations.
37. SCOTT, A. B., ROSENBAUM, A., AND COLLINS, C. C., 1973. Pharmocologic weakening of extraocluar muscles, Invest Ophthalmol, 12, 924.
38. SMALL, H., 1997. Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces, Scientometrics, 38, 2, 275-293.
39. SMALL, H. G., 1977. A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research, Scoial Studies of Science, 7, 139-166.
40. SMALL, H. G. AND GRIFFITH, B. C., 1974. The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties, Science Studies, 4, 17-40.
41. WATTS, D. J. AND STROGATZ, S. J., 1998. Collective dynamics of 'smallworld' networks, Nature, 393, 440-442.
42. WHITE, H. D., 2003. Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 5, 423-434.
43. WILLS, G. J., 1999. NicheWorks: Interactive visualization of very large graphs, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8, 2, 190-212.
44. ZIZI, M. AND BEAUDOUIN-LAFON, M., 1994. Accessing hyperdocuments through interactive dynamic maps. In Proceedings of ECHT '94, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1994 126-135.