Misreading science in the twentieth century

Science Communication

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 300-315

  Budd, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035593142     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547001022003007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Braunwald, E. 1987. On analyzing scientific fraud. Nature 325:215-16.
2. _. 1992. Cardiology: The John Darsee experience. In Research fraud in the behavioral and biomedical sciences, edited by D. J. Miller and M. Herson, 55-79. New York: John Wiley.
3. Broad, W., and N. Wade. 1982. Betrayers of the truth: Fraud and deceit in the halls of science. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4. Budd, J. M., M. Sievert, and T. R. Schultz. 1998. Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. Journal of the American Medical Association 280:296-97.
5. Cole, S. 1996. Voodoo sociology: Recent developments in the sociology of science. In The flight from science and reason, edited by P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, and M. W. Lewis, 274-87. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
6. Dorfman, D. D. 1978. The Cyril Burt question: New findings. Science 201:1177-86.
7. Eysenk, H. J. 1995. Burt as hero and anti-hero: A Greek tragedy. In Cyril Burt: Fraud or framed, edited by N. J. Mackintosh, 111-29. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Fish, S. E. 1980. Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. In Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism, edited by J. P. Tompkins, 70-100. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Fletcher, R. 1987. The doubtful case of Cyril Burt. Social Policy & Administration 21:40-57.
10. Fuller, S. 2000. Science studies through the looking glass: An intellectual itinerary. In Beyond the science wars: The missing discourse about science and society, edited by U. Segerstråle, 185-217. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11. Goldman, A. I. 1999. Knowledge in a social world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Gross, B. R. 1996. Flights of fancy: Science, reason, and common sense. In The flight from science and reason, edited by P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, and M. W. Lewis, 79-86. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
13. Gross, P. 1997. The so-called science wars and sociological gravitas. The Scientist, 28 April, 8.
14. Gross, P. R., and N. Levitt. 1994. Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Hearnshaw, L. S. 1979. Cyril Burt: Psychologist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. Hirschkop, K. 1997. Cultural studies and its discontents: A comment on the Sokal affair. Social Text 50:131-33.
17. Iser, W. 1974. The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. _. 1989. Prospecting: From reader response to literary anthropology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. _. 2000. The range of interpretation. New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Kamin, L. 1974. The science and politics of I.Q. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Kochan, C. A., and J. M. Budd. 1992. The persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee case. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43:488-93.
22. Kohn, A. 1986. False prophets: Fraud and error in science and medicine. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
23. Koshland, D. 1987. Fraud in science. Science 235:141.
24. Poulet, G. 1980. Criticism and the experience of interiority. In Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism, edited by J. P. Tompkins, 41-49. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Prelli, L. J. 1989. A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
26. Rosenblatt, L. M. 1994. The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
27. Ross, A. 1991. Strange science: Culture, science and technology in the age of limits. London: Verso.
28. _. 1996. Introduction. Social Text 46-47:1-13.
29. Rushton, J. P. 1994. Victim of scientific hoax. Society 31:40-44.
30. Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Segerstråle, U. 2000. Science and science studies: Enemies or allies? In Beyond the science wars: The missing discourse about science and society, edited by U. Segerstråle, 1-40. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32. Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan andthe air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Sokal, A. 1996. Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text 46-47:217-52.
34. Sokal, A., and J. Bricmont. 1998. Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science. New York: Picador.
35. Stewart, W. W., andN. Feder. 1987. The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature 325:207-14.
36. Weinberg, S. 1996. Sokal's hoax. New York Review of Books, 8 August, 11-15.
37. Willmott, P. 1977. Integrity in social science: The upshot of a scandal. International Social Science Journal 29:333-36.