Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision

Brain and Language

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 102-109

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Fraga, Isabel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Coding scheme; Letter encoding; Lexical decision; Visual field; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; READING; SPEECH ARTICULATION; VISUAL FIELD; WORD RECOGNITION;

BRAIN; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; VISUAL FIELDS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33644987361     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. J.R. Alameda, and F. Cuetos Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano 1995 Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo
2. S. Andrews Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability Journal of Memory and Language 35 1996 775 800
3. S.M. Chambers Letter and order information in lexical access Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 1979 225 241
4. S.T.L. Chung, D.M. Levi, and G.E. Legge Crowding: A classical spatial-frequency masking effect? Vision Research 41 2001 1833 1850
5. M. Coltheart, K. Rastle, C. Perry, J. Ziegler, and R. Langdon DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud Psychological Review 108 2001 204 256
6. J. Coney Word frequency and the lateralization of lexical processes Neuropsychologia 43 2005 142 148
7. C.J. Davis, and J.S. Bowers What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 2004 923 941
8. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
9. A.W. Ellis Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation Brain and Language 88 2004 355 366
10. Gómez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (2003). The overlap model of the encoding of letter positions. In Poster presented at the 45th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
11. J. Grainger, and A.M. Jacobs Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model Psychological Review 103 1996 518 565
12. J. Grainger, and W.J.B. van Heuven Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception P. Bonin The mental lexicon 2003 Nova Science New York 1 23
13. J. Grainger, and C. Whitney Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 2004 58 59
14. Johnson, R.L., Rayner, K., & Perea, M. (submitted). Transposed-letter effects in reading.
15. M. Lavidor, and A.W. Ellis Orthographic neighborhood effects in the right but not in the left cerebral hemisphere Brain and Language 80 2002 63 76
16. M. Lavidor, and A.W. Ellis Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres Brain and Language 80 2002 45 62
17. M. Mishkin, and D.G. Forgays Word recognition as a function of retinal locus Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 1952 43 48
18. P. Monaghan, R.C. Shillcock, and S. McDonald Hemispheric asymmetries in the split-fovea model of semantic processing Brain and Language 88 2004 339 354
19. R.C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia 9 1971 97 113
20. R.E. O'Connor, and K.I. Forster Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition Memory and Cognition 9 1981 78 92
21. M. Perea, and M. Carreiras Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 1998 134 144
22. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (in press). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
23. M. Perea, and S.J. Lupker Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming Memory and Cognition 31 2003 829 841
24. M. Perea, and S.J. Lupker Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming S. Kinoshita S.J. Lupker Masked priming: State of the art 2003 Psychology Press Hove, UK 97 120
25. M. Perea, and S.J. Lupker Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions Journal of Memory and Language 51 2004 231 246
26. M. Perea, E. Rosa, and C. Gómez The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task Perception and Psychophysics 67 2005 301 314
27. R. Ratcliff A theory of order relations in perceptual matching Psychological Review 88 1981 552 572
28. D.E. Rumelhart, and J.L. McClelland An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model Psychological Review 89 1982 60 94
29. S. Schoonbaert, and J. Grainger Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters Language and Cognitive Processes 19 2004 333 367
30. N. Sebastián-Gallés, M.A. Martí, M. Carreiras, and F. Cuetos LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español 2000 Edicions Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona
31. R.C. Shillcock, and P. Monaghan Reading, sublexical units and scrambled words: Capturing the human data H. Bowman C. Labiouse Proceedings of the eighth neural computation and psychology workshop: Connectionist models of cognition and perception II 2004 World Scientific Singapore 221 230
32. M. Taft, and F. van Graan Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task Journal of Memory and Language 38 1998 203 224
33. C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8 2001 221 243
34. C. Whitney Hemispheric-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access Brain and Language 88 2004 279 293
35. C. Whitney, and M. Lavidor Why word length only matters in the left visual field Neuropsychologia 42 2004 1680 1688