Does conal prime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 557-565

  Pollatsek, Alexander ^a   Perea, Manuel ^b   Carreiras, Manuel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONSONANT; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; DECISION MAKING; ERROR; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PHONETICS; SOUND; STUDENT; VOWEL; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPAIN;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPAIN; VOCABULARY;

EID: 26944494992     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193071     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ALAMEDA, J. R., & CUETOS, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano [Dictionary of word frequency in Castilian Spanish]. Oviedo: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
2. BERENT, I., & PERFETTI, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
3. CARREIRAS, M., ÁLVAREZ, C. J., & DE VEGA, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 766-780.
4. CARREIRAS, M., & PEREA, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1228-1242.
5. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZIEGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
6. COLOMBO, L., ZORZI, M., CUBELLI, R., & BRIVIO, C. (2003). The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly: Testing the two-cycles model with Italian. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 405-433.
7. DANEMAN, M., & REINGOLD, E. M. (2000). Do readers use phonological codes to activate word meanings? Evidence from eye movements. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 447-473). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. DAVIS, C., CASTLES, A., & IAKOVIDIS, E. (1998). Masked homophone and pseudohomophone priming in children and adults. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 625-651.
9. DRIEGHE, D., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 951-961.
10. FERRAND, L., & GRAINGER, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
11. FERRAND, L., & GRAINGER, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
12. FORSTER, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13. FORSTER, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203-233.
14. FORSTER, K. I., & DAVIS, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
15. FORSTER, K. I., MOHAN, K., & HECTOR, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 3-17). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
16. FROST, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
17. FROST, R., AHISSAR, M., GOTTESMAN, R., & TAYEB, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 346-378.
18. LEE, H.-W., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1999). The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming technique. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 624-634.
19. LEE, H.-W., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (2002). The processing of consonants and vowels in reading: Evidence from the fast priming paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 766-772.
20. LUKATELA, G., FROST, S., & TURVEY, M. T. (1998). Phonological priming by masked nonword primes in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 666-683.
21. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1990). Automatic and prelexical computation of phonology in visual word identification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 325-344.
22. PALLIER, C., DUPOUX, E., & JEANNIN, X. (1997). EXPE: An expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 322-327.
23. PEREA, M., & CARREIRAS, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 134-144.
24. PEREA, M., & FORSTER, K. I. (2005). The neighborhood density constraint on form/repetition priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 231-246.
26. POLLATSEK, A., LESCH, M., MORRIS, R. K., & RAYNER, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception &. Performance, 18, 148-162.
27. POLLATSEK, A., TAN, L.-H., & RAYNER, K. (2000). The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 607-633.
28. POLLATSEK, A., & WELL, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 785-794.
29. RATCLIFF, R., GÓMEZ, P., & MCKOON, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of lexical decision. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
30. RAYNER, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
31. SHEN, D., & FORSTER, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 429-459.
32. VAN ORDEN, G. C., PENNINGTON, B. F., & STONE, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.