Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: Impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 245-252

  Corbett, Albert T ^a   Anderson, John R ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback in problem solving; Instructional interface design; Intelligent tutoring systems; Student modeling

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENT LEARNING; ERROR FEEDBACK; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INTERFACE DESIGNS; LEARNING OPPORTUNITY; LEARNING RATES; STUDENT MODELING;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; ERROR CORRECTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SURVEYS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 0035030527     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/365024.365111     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Anderson, J.R., Conrad, F.G. and Corbett, A.T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cognitive Science, 13, 467-505.
2. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R. and Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
3. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T. and Reiser, B.J. (1987) Essential Lisp. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Anderson, J.R. and Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A. & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
6. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P.L., and Brown, A.L. (1995). Training in self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221-252.
7. Corbett, A.T. and Anderson, J.R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
8. Corbett, A.T. and Trask, H. (2000). Instructional interventions in computer-based tutoring: Differential impact on learning time and accuracy. CHI 2000 Conference Proceedings: The Future is Here, 97-104.
9. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M, Reimann, P., Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
10. Fox, B. (1991). Cognitive and interactional aspects of correction in tutoring. In P. Goodyear (ed.) Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Kulhavy, R.W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211-232.
12. Kulik, J.A. and Kulik, C.C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
13. Lepper, M.R., Woolverton, M., Mume, D.L. and Gurtner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (eds.) Computers a cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Merrill, D.C., Reiser, B.J., Ranney, M. and Trafton, J.G. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 277-305.
15. Munro, A., Fehling, M.R. and Towne, D.M. (1985). Instruction intrusiveness in dynamic simulation training. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12, 50-53.
16. Pressey, S.L. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores - and teaches. School and Society, 23 (586), 373-376.
17. Schmidt, R.A., Young, D.E., Swinnen, S. and Shapiro, D.C. (1989). Summary knowledge results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
18. Schofield, J.W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Schooler, L.J. and Anderson, J.R. (1990). The disruptive potential of immediate feedback. The Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cambridge, MA.