Mdt1 facilitates efficient repair of blocked DNA double-strand breaks and recombinational maintenance of telomeres

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 18, 2007, Pages 6532-6545

  Pike, Brietta L ^a,c   Heierhorst, Jörg ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b ST VINCENT'S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^c FRIEDRICH MIESCHER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLEOMYCIN; CAMPTOTHECIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; ENDONUCLEASE; PROTEIN MDT1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CTF18 GENE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENOTYPE; NONHUMAN; NORTHERN BLOTTING; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOUTHERN BLOTTING; TELOMERE;

ANTIBIOTICS, ANTINEOPLASTIC; ANTIGENS, NUCLEAR; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, PHYTOGENIC; BLEOMYCIN; CAMPTOTHECIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TELOMERE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 34548798676     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00471-07     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aouida, M., N. Page, A. Leduc, M. Peter, and D. Ramotar. 2004. A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals altered transport as a mechanism of resistance to the anticancer drug bleomycin. Cancer Res. 64:1102-1109.
2. Aylon, Y., B. Liefshitz, and M. Kupiec. 2004. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23:4868-4875.
3. Boulton, S. J., and S. P. Jackson. 1998. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 17:1819-1828.
4. Chan, S. W., and E. H. Blackburn. 2003. Telomerase and ATM/Tel1p protect telomeres from nonhomologous end joining. Mol. Cell 11:1379-1387.
5. Chen, J., and J. Stubbe. 2005. Bleomycins: towards better therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5:102-112.
6. Chen, Q., A. Ijpma, and C. W. Greider. 2001. Two survivor pathways that allow growth in the absence of telomerase are generated by distinct telomere recombination events. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:1819-1827.
7. Chen, Y. B., C. P. Yang, R. X. Li, R. Zeng, and J. Q. Zhou. 2005. Def1p is involved in telomere maintenance in budding yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 280:24784-24791.
8. Corda, Y., S. E. Lee, S. Guillot, A. Walther, J. Sollier, A. Arbel-Eden, J. E. Haber, and V. Geli. 2005. Inactivation of Ku-mediated end joining suppresses mec1Δ lethality by depleting the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 through a pathway controlled by Tel1 kinase and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:10652-10664.
9. Cost, G. J., and N. R. Cozzarelli. 2006. Smc5p promotes faithful chromosome transmission and DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172:2185-2200.
10. de Lange, T. 2005. Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev. 19:2100-2110.
11. Enomoto, S., L. Glowczewski, and J. Berman. 2002. MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2 are essential components of a telomere checkpoint pathway required for cell cycle arrest during senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 13:2626-2638.
12. Enyenihi, A. H., and W. S. Saunders. 2003. Large-scale functional genomic analysis of sporulation and meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 163:47-54.
13. Fasching, C. L., K. Bower, and R. R. Reddel. 2005. Telomerase-independent telomere length maintenance in the absence of alternative lengthening of telomeres-associated promyelocytic leukemia bodies. Cancer Res. 65:2722-2729.
14. Gavin, A. C., M. Bosche, R. Krause, P. Grandi, M. Marzioch, A. Bauer, J. Schultz, J. M. Rick, A. M. Michon, C. M. Cruciat, M. Remor, C. Hofert, M. Schelder, M. Brajenovic, H. Ruffner, A. Merino, K. Klein, M. Hudak, D. Dickson, T. Rudi, V. Gnau, A. Bauch, S. Bastuck, B. Huhse, C. Leutwein, M. A. Heurtier, R. R. Copley, A. Edelmann, E. Querfurth, V. Rybin, G. Drewes, M. Raida, T. Bouwmeester, P. Bork, B. Seraphin, B. Kuster, G. Neubauer, and G. Superti-Furga. 2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415:141-147.
15. Grandin, N., and M. Charbonneau. 2003. Mitotic cyclins regulate telomeric recombination in telomerase-deficient yeast cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:9162-9177.
16. Grandin, N., C. Damon, and M. Charbonneau. 2001. Cdc13 prevents telomere uncapping and Rad50-dependent homologous recombination. EMBO J. 20:6127-6139.
17. Groff-Vindman, C., A. J. Cesare, S. Natarajan, J. D. Griffith, and M. J. McEachern. 2005. Recombination at long mutant telomeres produces tiny single- and double-stranded telomeric circles. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:4406-4412.
18. Haber, J. E. 2000. Partners and pathways repairing a double-strand break. Trends Genet. 16:259-264.
19. Hammet, A., B. L. Pike, K. I. Mitchelhill, T. Teh, B. Kobe, C. M. House, B. E. Kemp, and J. Heierhorst. 2000. FHA domain boundaries of the Dun1p and Rad53p cell cycle checkpoint kinases. FEBS Lett. 471:141-146.
20. Hanna, J. S., E. S. Kroll, V. Lundblad, and F. A. Spencer. 2001. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3144-3158.
21. Hiraga, S., E. D. Robertson, and A. D. Donaldson. 2006. The Ctf18 RFC-like complex positions yeast telomeres but does not specify their replication time. EMBO J. 25:1505-1514.
22. Huang, P., F. E. Pryde, D. Lester, R. L. Maddison, R. H. Borts, I. D. Hickson, and E. J. Louis. 2001. SGS1 is required for telomere elongation in the absence of telomerase. Curr. Biol. 11:125-129.
23. Ira, G., A. Malkova, G. Liberi, M. Foiani, and J. E. Haber. 2003. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115:401-411.
24. Ira, G., A. Pellicioli, A. Balijja, X. Wang, S. Fiorani, W. Carotenuto, G. Liberi, D. Bressan, L. Wan, N. M. Hollingsworth, J. E. Haber, and M. Foiani. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011-1017.
25. Keogh, M. C., J. A. Kim, M. Downey, J. Fillingham, D. Chowdhury, J. C. Harrison, M. Onishi, N. Datta, S. Galicia, A. Emili, J. Lieberman, X. Shen, S. Buratowski, J. E. Haber, D. Durocher, J. F. Greenblatt, and N. J. Krogan. 2006. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439:497-501.
26. Krogan, N. J., M. H. Lam, J. Fillingham, M. C. Keogh, M. Gebbia, J. Li, N. Datta, G. Cagney, S. Buratowski, A. Emili, and J. F. Greenblatt. 2004. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 16:1027-1034.
27. Krogh, B. O., and L. S. Symington. 2004. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:233-271.
28. Larrivee, M., and R. J. Wellinger. 2006. Telomerase- and capping-independent yeast survivors with alternate telomere states. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:741-747.
29. Le, S., J. K. Moore, J. E. Haber, and C. W. Greider. 1999. RAD50 and RAD51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. Genetics 152:143-152.
30. Lee, S. J., M. F. Schwartz, J. K. Duong, and D. F. Stern. 2003. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6300-6314.
31. Leroy, C., S. E. Lee, M. B. Vaze, F. Ochsenbien, R. Guerois, J. E. Haber, and M. C. Marsolier-Kergoat. 2003. PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break. Mol. Cell 11:827-835.
32. Lin, C. Y., H. H. Chang, K. J. Wu, S. F. Tseng, C. C. Lin, C. P. Lin, and S. C. Teng. 2005. Extrachromosomal telomeric circles contribute to Rad52-, Rad50-, and polymerase delta-mediated telomere-telomere recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 4:327-336.
33. Lisby, M., J. H. Barlow, R. C. Burgess, and R. Rothstein. 2004. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118:699-713.
34. Llorente, B., and L. S. Symington. 2004. The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5′ to 3′ resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:9682-9694.
35. Lombard, D. B., K. F. Chua, R. Mostoslavsky, S. Franco, M. Gostissa, and F. W. Alt. 2005. DNA repair, genome stability, and aging. Cell 120:497-512.
36. Lowell, J. E., A. I. Roughton, V. Lundblad, and L. Pillus. 2003. Telomerase-independent proliferation is influenced by cell type in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 164:909-921.
37. Ma, J. L., E. M. Kim, J. E. Haber, and S. E. Lee. 2003. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8820-8828.
38. Maillet, L., F. Gaden, V. Brevet, G. Fourel, S. G. Martin, K. Dubrana, S. M. Gasser, and E. Gilson. 2001. Ku-deficient yeast strains exhibit alternative states of silencing competence. EMBO Rep. 2:203-210.
39. Mantiero, D., M. Clerici, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2007. Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep. 8:380-387.
40. Maringele, L., and D. Lydall. 2004. EXO1 plays a role in generating type I and type II survivors in budding yeast. Genetics 166:1641-1649.
41. McNees, C. J., L. A. Conlan, N. Tenis, and J. Heierhorst. 2005. ASCIZ regulates lesion-specific Rad51 focus formation and apoptosis after methylating DNA damage. EMBO J. 24:2447-2457.
42. Morrison, A. J., J. Highland, N. J. Krogan, A. Arbel-Eden, J. F. Greenblatt, J. E. Haber, and X. Shen. 2004. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119:767-775.
43. Muntoni, A., and R. R. Reddel. 2005. The first molecular details of ALT in human tumor cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(Spec. 2):R191-R196.
44. Neale, M. J., J. Pan, and S. Keeney. 2005. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436:1053-1057.
45. Pan, X., P. Ye, D. S. Yuan, X. Wang, J. S. Bader, and J. D. Boeke. 2006. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124:1069-1081.
46. 2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 7:293-300.
47. Pennaneach, V., C. D. Putnam, and R. D. Kolodner. 2006. Chromosome healing by de novo telomere addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 59:1357-1368.
48. Pike, B. L., A. Hammet, and J. Heierhorst. 2001. Role of the N-terminal forkhead-associated domain in the cell cycle checkpoint function of the Rad53 kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 276:14019-14026.
49. Pike, B. L., N. Tenis, and J. Heierhorst. 2004. Rad53 kinase activation-independent replication checkpoint function of the N-terminal forkhead-associated (FHA1) domain. J. Biol. Chem. 279:39636-39644.
50. Pike, B. L., S. Yongkiettrakul, M. D. Tsai, and J. Heierhorst. 2003. Diverse but overlapping functions of the two forkhead-associated (FHA) domains in Rad53 checkpoint kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:30421-30424.
51. 2/M cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2779-2788.
52. Pouliot, J. J., C. A. Rohertson, and H. A. Nash. 2001. Pathways for repair of topoisomerase I covalent complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Cells 6:677-687.
53. Ramotar, D., and H. Wang. 2003. Protective mechanisms against the antitumor agent bleomycin: lessons from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 43:213-224.
54. Richardson, C., and M. Jasin. 2000. Recombination between two chromosomes: implications for genomic integrity in mammalian cells. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 65:553-560.
55. Sanchez, Y., B. A. Desany, W. J. Jones, Q. Liu, B. Wang, and S. J. Elledge. 1996. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357-360.
56. Shim, E. Y., J. L. Ma, J. H. Oum, Y. Yanez, and S. E. Lee. 2005. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3934-3944.
57. Stellwagen, A. E., Z. W. Haimberger, J. R. Veatch, and D. E. Gottschling. 2003. Ku interacts with telomerase RNA to promote telomere addition at native and broken chromosome ends. Genes Dev. 17:2384-2395.
58. Takata, H., Y. Kanoh, N. Gunge, K. Shirahige, and A. Matsuura. 2004. Reciprocal association of the budding yeast ATM-related proteins Tel1 and Mec1 with telomeres in vivo. Mol. Cell 14:515-522.
59. Tam, A. T., B. L. Pike, A. Hammet, and J. Heierhorst. 2007. Telomere-related functions of yeast KU in the repair of bleomycin-induced DNA damage. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 357:800-803.
60. Teng, S. C., and V. A. Zakian. 1999. Telomere-telomere recombination is an efficient bypass pathway for telomere maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:8083-8093.
61. Teo, S. H., and S. P. Jackson. 1997. Identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA ligase IV: involvement in DNA double-strand break repair. EMBO J. 16:4788-4795.
62. Therizols, P., C. Fairhead, G. G. Cabal, A. Genovesio, J. C. Olivo-Marin, B. Dujon, and E. Fabre. 2006. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. J. Cell Biol. 172:189-199.
63. Tong, A. H., G. Lesage, G. D. Bader, H. Ding, H. Xu, X. Xin, J. Young, G. F. Berriz, R. L. Brost, M. Chang, Y. Chen, X. Cheng, G. Chua, H. Friesen, D. S. Goldberg, J. Haynes, C. Humphries, G. He, S. Hussein, L. Ke, N. Krogan, Z. Li, J. N. Levinson, H. Lu, P. Menard, C. Munyana, A. B. Parsons, O. Ryan, R. Tonikian, T. Roberts, A. M. Sdicu, J. Shapiro, B. Sheikh, B. Suter, S. L. Wong, L. V. Zhang, H. Zhu, C. G. Burd, S. Munro, C. Sander, J. Rine, J. Greenblatt, M. Peter, A. Bretscher, G. Bell, F. P. Roth, G. W. Brown, B. Andrews, H. Bussey, and C. Boone. 2004. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303:808-813.
64. Traven, A., and J. Heierhorst. 2005. SQ/TQ cluster domains: concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins. BioEssays 27:297-307.
65. Tsai, H. J., W. H. Huang, T. K. Li, Y. L. Tsai, K. J. Wu, S. F. Tseng, and S. C. Teng. 2006. Involvement of topoisomerase III in telomere-telomere recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 281:13717-13723.
66. Tsai, Y. L., S. F. Tseng, S. H. Chang, C. C. Lin, and S. C. Teng. 2002. Involvement of replicative polymerases, Tel1p, Mec1p, Cdc13p, and the Ku complex in telomere-telomere recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:5679-5687.
67. Unal, E., A. Arbel-Eden, U. Sattler, R. Shroff, M. Lichten, J. E. Haber, and D. Koshland. 2004. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16:991-1002.
68. Usui, T., H. Ogawa, and J. H. Petrini. 2001. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7:1255-1266.
69. Valencia, M., M. Bentele, M. B. Vaze, G. Herrmann, E. Kraus, S. E. Lee, P. Schar, and J. E. Haber. 2001. NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 414:666-669.
70. Valencia-Burton, M., M. Oki, J. Johnson, T. A. Seier, R. Kamakaka, and J. E. Haber. 2006. Different mating-type-regulated genes affect the DNA repair defects of Saccharomyces RAD51, RAD52 and RAD55 mutants. Genetics 174:41-55.
71. van Attikum, H., O. Fritsch, B. Hohn, and S. M. Gasser. 2004. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119:777-788.
72. Vega, L. R., M. K. Mateyak, and V. A. Zakian. 2003. Getting to the end: telomerase access in yeast and humans. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:948-959.
73. Wilson, T. E., U. Grawunder, and M. R. Lieber. 1997. Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining. Nature 388:495-498.
74. Zhao, X., E. G. Muller, and R. Rothstein. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2:329-340.
75. Zhou, B. B., and S. J. Elledge. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408:433-439.