The role of the DNA damage checkpoint in regulation of translesion DNA synthesis

Mutagenesis

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 155-160

  Koren, Amnon ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DNA POLYMERASE; GENOMIC DNA;

BASE MISPAIRING; CELL CYCLE ARREST; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRUCTURE; DNA SYNTHESIS; EXCISION REPAIR; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE CONTROL; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENES, CDC; MUTAGENESIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 34548461545     PISSN: 02678357     EISSN: 14643804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gem003     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Zhou, B.-B. S. and Elledge, S. J. (2000) The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature, 408, 433-439.
2. Nyberg, K. A., Michelson, R. J., Putnam, C. W. and Weinert, T. A. (2002) Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet., 36, 617-656.
3. Kastan, M. B. and Bartek, J. (2004) Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature, 432, 316-323.
4. Bartek, J., Lukas, C. and Lukas, J. (2004) Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 792-804.
5. Hartwell, L. H. and Weinert, T. A. (1989) Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science, 246, 629-634.
6. Friedberg, E. C. (2005) Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 6, 943-953.
7. Goodman, M. F. (2002) Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 71, 17-50.
8. Paulovich, A. G., Armour, C. D. and Hartwell, L. H. (1998) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. Genetics, 150, 75-93.
9. Gentner, N. E., Werner, M. M., Hannan, M. A. and Nasim, A. (1978) Contribution of a caffeine-sensitive recombinational repair pathway to survival and mutagenesis in UV-irradiated Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Gen. Genet., 167, 43-49.
10. Majka, J. and Burgers, P. M. (2004) The PCNA-RFC families of DNA clamps and clamp loaders. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 78, 227-260.
11. Maga, G. and Hubscher, U. (2003) Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. J. Cell Sci., 116, 3051-3060.
12. Helt, C. E., Wang, W., Keng, P. C. and Bambara, R. A. (2005) 9-1-1 complex involvement in DNA repair: evidence that DNA damage detection machinery participates in DNA repair. Cell Cycle, 4, 529-532.
13. Sabbioneda, S., Minesinger, B. K., Giannattasio, M., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M. and Jinks-Robertson, S. (2005) The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with Polf and is partially required for spontaneous Polζ-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem., 280, 38657-38665.
14. Kai, M. and Wang, T. S.-F. (2003) Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev., 17, 64-76.
15. Kanellis, P., Agyei, R. and Durocher, D. (2003) Elg1 forms an alternative PCNA-interacting RFC complex required to maintain genome stability. Curr. Biol., 13, 1583-1595.
16. Bellaoui, M., Chang, M., Ou, J., Xu, H., Boone, C. and Brown, G. W. (2003) Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity. EMBO J., 22, 4304-4313.
17. Ben-Aroya, S., Koren, A., Liefshitz, B., Steinlauf, R. and Kupiec, M. (2003) ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor C. PNAS, 100, 9906-9911.
18. Liberi, G., Chiolo, I., Pellicioli, A., Lopes, M., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M. and Foiani, M. (2000) Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J., 19, 5027-5038.
19. Schiestl, R. H., Prakash, S. and Prakash, L. (1990) The SRS2 suppressor of rad6 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acts by channeling DNA lesions into the RAD52 DNA repair pathway. Genetics, 124, 817-831.
20. Papouli, E., Chen, S., Davies, A. A., Huttner, D., Krejci, L., Sung, P. and Ulrich, H. D. (2005) Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell, 19, 123-133.
21. Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.-L., Sacher, M., Hoege, C. and Jentsch, S. (2005) SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature, 436, 428-433.
22. Liu, G. and Chen, X. (2006) DNA polymerase {eta}, the product of the xeroderma pigmentosum variant gene and a target of p53, modulates the DNA damage checkpoint and p53 activation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 26, 1398-1413.
23. Hirano, Y. and Sugimoto, K. (2006) ATR homolog Mec1 controls association of DNA polymerase zeta-Rev1 complex with regions near a double-strand break. Curr. Biol., 16, 586-590.
24. Bi, X., Slater, D. M., Ohmori, H. and Vaziri, C. (2005) DNA polymerase κ is specifically required for recovery from the benzo[a]pyrene- dihydrodiol epoxide (BPDE)-induced S-phase checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem., 280, 22343-22355.
25. Kannouche, P. L., Wing, J. and Lehmann, A. R. (2004) Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell, 14, 491-500.
26. Stelter, P. and Ulrich, H. D. (2003) Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature, 425, 188-191.
27. Watanabe, K., Tateishi, S., Kawasuji, M., Tsurimoto, T., Inoue, H. and Yamaizumi, M. (2004) Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J., 23, 3886-3896.
28. Bi, X., Barkley, L. R., Slater, D. M., Tateishi, S., Yamaizumi, M., Ohmori, H. and Vaziri, C. (2006) Rad18 regulates DNA polymerase {kappa} and is required for recovery from S-phase checkpoint-mediated arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol., 26, 3527-3540.
29. Chabes, A., Georgieva, B., Domkin, V., Zhao, X., Rothstein, R. and Thelander, L. (2003) Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Cell, 112, 391-401.
30. Washington, M. T., Johnson, R. E., Prakash, L. and Prakash, S. (2003) The mechanism of nucleotide incorporation by human DNA polymerase {eta} differs from that of the yeast enzyme. Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 8316-8322.
31. Tercero, J. A., Longhese, M. P. and Diffley, J. F. (2003) A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell, 11, 1323-1336.
32. Tercero, J. A. and Diffley, J. F. X. (2001) Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature, 412, 553-557.
33. Lopes, M., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M., Newlon, C. S. and Foiani, M. (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature, 412, 557-561.
34. Kuzminov, A. (2001) DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. PNAS, 98, 8461-8468.
35. Desany, B. A., Alcasabas, A. A., Bachant, J. B. and Elledge, S. J. (1998) Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev., 12, 2956-2970.
36. Bashkirov, V. I., King, J. S., Bashkirova, E. V., Schmuckli-Maurer, J. and Heyer, W.-D. (2000) DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 4393-4404.
37. Longhese, M. P., Paciotti, V., Fraschini, R., Zaccarini, R., Plevani, P. and Lucchini, G. (1997) The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J., 16, 5216-5226.
38. Aylon, Y. and Kupiec, M. (2003) The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 6585-6596.
39. Jeggo, P. A., Carr, A. M. and Lehmann, A. R. (1998) Splitting the ATM: distinct repair and checkpoint defects in ataxia-telangiectasia. Trends Genet., 14, 312-316.
40. Sanchez, Y., Bachant, J., Wang, H., Hu, F., Liu, D., Tetzlaff, M. and Elledge, S. J. (1999) Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science, 286, 1166-1171.
41. Liu, Y., Vidanes, G., Lin, Y. C., Mori, S. and Siede, W. (2000) Characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Chk1 involved in DNA-damage-induced M-phase arrest. Mol. Gen. Genet., 262, 1132-1146.
42. Paciotti, V., Clerici, M., Scotti, M., Lucchini, G. and Longhese, M. P. (2001) Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 3913-3925.
43. Xu, B., O'Donnell, A. H., Kim, S.-T. and Kastan, M. B. (2002) Phosphorylation of serine 1387 in Brca1 is specifically required for the Atm-mediated S-phase checkpoint after ionizing irradiation. Cancer Res., 62, 4588-4591.
44. Kumar, S. and Huberman, J. A. (2004) On the slowing of S phase in response to DNA damage in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem., 279, 43574-43580.
45. Lieberman, H. B. (1995) Extragenic suppressors of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad9 mutations uncouple radioresistance and hydroxyurea sensitivity from cell cycle checkpoint control. Genetics, 141, 107-117.
46. Griffiths, D. J., Barbet, N. C., McCready, S., Lehmann, A. R. and Carr, A. M. (1995) Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins. EMBO J., 14, 5812-5823.
47. Lydall, D. and Weinert, T. (1997) G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair. Mol. Gen. Genet., 256, 638-651.
48. Alcasabas, A. A., Osborn, A. J., Bachant, J., Hu, F., Werler, P. J., Bousset, K., Furuya, K., Diffley, J. F., Carr, A. M. and Elledge, S. J. (2001) Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 958-965.
49. Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Schultz, R. A. and Ellenberger, T. (2005) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
50. Peterson, K. R. and Mount, D. W. (1987) Differential repression of SOS genes by unstable LexA41 (Tsl-1) protein causes a "split-phenotype" in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Mol. Biol., 193, 27-40.
51. Schnarr, M., Oertel-Buchheit, P., Kazmaier, M. and Granger-Schnarr, M. (1991) DNA binding properties of the LexA repressor. Biochimie, 73, 423-431.
52. Gasch, A. P., Huang, M., Metzner, S., Botstein, D., Elledge, S. J. and Brown, P. O. (2001) Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol. Biol. Cell, 12, 2987-3003.
53. Watson, A., Mata, J., Bahler, J., Carr, A. and Humphrey, T. (2004) Global gene expression responses of fission yeast to ionizing radiation. Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 851-860.
54. Birrell, G. W., Brown, J. A., Wu, H. I., Giaever, G., Chu, A. M., Davis, R. W. and Brown, J. M. (2002) Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents. PNAS, 99, 8778-8783.
55. Cole, G. M. and Mortimer, R. K. (1989) Failure to induce a DNA repair gene, RAD54, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not affect DNA repair or recombination phenotypes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 9, 3314-3322.
56. Dar, M. E., Winters, T. A. and Jorgensen, T. J. (1997) Identification of defective illegitimate recombinational repair of oxidatively-induced DNA double-strand breaks in ataxia-telangiectasia cells. Mutat. Res., 384, 169-179.
57. Luo, C.-M., Tang, W., Mekeel, K. L., DeFrank, J. S., Ann, P. R. and Powell, S. N. (1996) High frequency and error-prone DNA recombination in ataxia telangiectasia cell lines. J. Biol. Chem., 271, 4497-4503.
58. Kuhne, M., Riballo, E., Rief, N., Rothkamm, K., Jeggo, P. A. and Lobrich, M. (2004) A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity. Cancer Res., 64, 500-508.
59. Stewart, G. S., Maser, R. S., Stankovic, T., Bressan, D. A., Kaplan, M. I., Jaspers, N. G., Raams, A., Byrd, P. J., Petrini, J. H. and Taylor, A. M. (1999) The DNA double-strand break repair gene hMRE11 is mutated in individuals with an ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder. Cell, 99, 577-587.
60. Powell, S., Whitaker, S., Peacock, J. and McMillan, T. (1993) Ataxia telangiectasia: an investigation of the repair defect in the cell line AT5BIVA by plasmid reconstitution. Mutat. Res., 294, 9-20.
61. Fijalkowska, I. J., Dunn, R. L. and Schaaper, R. M. (1997) Genetic requirements and mutational specificity of the Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity. J. Bacteriol., 179, 7435-7445.
62. Watanabe-Akanuma, M., Woodgate, R. and Ohta, T. (1997) Enhanced generation of A:T->T:A transversions in a recA730 lexA51(Def) mutant of Escherichia coli. Mutat. Res., 373, 61-66.
63. Kim, S.-R., Maenhaut-Michel, G., Yamada, M., Yamamoto, Y., Matsui, K., Sofuni, T., Nohmi, T. and Ohmori, H. (1997) Multiple pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: an overexpression of dinB/dinP results in strongly enhancing mutagenesis in the absence of any exogenous treatment to damage DNA. PNAS, 94, 13792-13797.
64. Lawrence, C. W. and Christensen, R. B. (1982) The mechanism of untargeted mutagenesis in UV-irradiated yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet., 186, 1-9.
65. Zhao, X., Muller, E. G. and Rothstein, R. (1998) A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell, 2, 329-340.
66. Zhao, X., Chabes, A., Domkin, V., Thelander, L. and Rothstein, R. (2001) The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. EMBO J., 20, 3544-3553.
67. Santocanale, C. and Diffley, J. F. X. (1998) A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature, 395, 615-618.
68. Shirahige, K., Hori, Y., Shiraishi, K., Yamashita, M., Takahashi, K., Obuse, C., Tsurimoto, T. and Yoshikawa, H. (1998) Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature, 395, 618-621.
69. Shechter, D., Costanzo, V. and Gautier, J. (2004) ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing. Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 648-655.
70. Cha, R. S. and Kleckner, N. (2002) ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science, 297, 602-606.
71. Jinks-Robertson, S. and Petes, T. D. (1986) Chromosomal translocations generated by high-frequency meiotic recombination between repeated yeast genes. Genetics, 114, 731-752.
72. Lemoine, F. J., Degtyareva, N. P., Lobachev, K. and Petes, T. D. (2005) Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell, 120, 587-598.
73. Admire, A., Shanks, L., Danzl, N., Wang, M., Weier, U., Stevens, W., Hunt, E. and Weinert, T. (2006) Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev., 20, 159-173.
74. Casper, A. M., Nghiem, P., Arlt, M. F. and Glover, T. W. (2002) ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell, 111, 779-789.
75. Arlt, M. F., Xu, B., Durkin, S. G., Casper, A. M., Kastan, M. B. and Glover, T. W. (2004) BRCA1 is required for common-fragile-site stability via its G2/M checkpoint function. Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 6701-6709.
76. Kim, J.-E., McAvoy, S. A., Smith, D. I. and Chen, J. (2005) Human TopBP1 ensures genome integrity during normal S phase. Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 10907-10915.
77. Mishmar, D., Rahat, A., Scherer, S. W. et al. (1998) Molecular characterization of a common fragile site (FRA7H) on human chromosome 7 by the cloning of a simian virus 40 integration site. PNAS, 95, 8141-8146.
78. Mishmar, D., Mandel-Gutfreund, Y., Margalit, H., Rahat, A. and Kerem, B. (1999) Common fragile sites: G-band characteristics within an R-band. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 64, 908-910.
79. Zlotorynski, E., Rahat, A., Skaug, J., Ben-Porat, N., Ozeri, E., Hershberg, R., Levi, A., Scherer, S. W., Margalit, H. and Kerem, B. (2003) Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites. Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 7143-7151.
80. Le Beau, M., Rassool, F., Neilly, M., Espinosa, R.III, Glover, T., Smith, D. and McKeithan, T. (1998) Replication of a common fragile site, FRA3B, occurs late in S phase and is delayed further upon induction: implications for the mechanism of fragile site induction. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 755-761.
81. Wang, L., Darling, J., Zhang, J., Huang, H., Liu, W. and Smith, D. (1999) Allele-specific late replication and fragility of the most active common fragile site, FRA3B. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 431-437.
82. Hellman, A., Rahat, A., Scherer, S. W., Darvasi, A., Tsui, L.-C. and Kerem, B. (2000) Replication delay along FRA7H, a common fragile site on human chromosome 7, leads to chromosomal instability. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 4420-4427.
83. Palakodeti, A., Han, Y., Jiang, Y. and Le Beau, M. M. (2004) The role of late/slow replication of the FRA16D in common fragile site induction. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 39, 71-76.
84. Chiu, R. K., Brun, J., Ramaekers, C., Theys, J., Weng, L., Lambin, P., Gray, D. and Wouters, B. (2006) Lysine63 polyubiquitination guards against translesion synthesis induced mutations. PLoS Genet., Preprint, e116.eor.
85. Haghnazari, E. and Heyer, W.-D. (2004) The DNA damage checkpoint pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a double-stranded DNA gap. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 4257-4268.