Elg1 forms an alternative PCNA-interacting RFC complex required to maintain genome stability

Current Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 1583-1595

  Kanellis, Pamela ^a,b   Agyei, Roger ^a   Durocher, Daniel ^a,b  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 0141504148     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00578-5     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Solomon, E., Borrow, J., and Goddard, A.D. (1991). Chromosome aberrations and cancer. Science 254, 1153-1160.
2. Kolodner, R.D., Putnam, C.D., and Myung, K. (2002). Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297, 552-557.
3. Gray, J.W., and Collins, C. (2000). Genome changes and gene expression in human solid tumors. Carcinogenesis 21, 443-452.
4. Cahill, D.P., Kinzler, K.W., Vogelstein, B., and Lengauer, C. (1999). Genetic instability and Darwinian selection in tumours. Trends Cell Biol. 9, M57-M60.
5. Rothstein, R., Michel, B., and Gangloff, S. (2000). Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Genes Dev. 14, 1-10.
6. Kuzminov, A. (2001). DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8461-8468.
7. Tercero, J.A., and Diffley, J.F. (2001). Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412, 553-557.
8. Cha, R.S., and Kleckner, N. (2002). ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297, 602-606.
9. Myung, K., Datta, A., and Kolodner, R.D. (2001). Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104, 397-408.
10. Levitt, N.C., and Hickson, I.D. (2002). Caretaker tumour suppressor genes that defend genome integrity. Trends Mol. Med. 8, 179-186.
11. Hackett, J.A., Feldser, D.M., and Greider, C.W. (2001). Telomere dysfunction increases mutation rate and genomic instability. Cell 106, 275-286.
12. Myung, K., Chen, C., and Kolodner, R.D. (2001). Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411, 1073-1076.
13. Lengronne, A., and Schwob, E. (2002). The yeast CDK inhibitor Sic1 prevents genomic instability by promoting replication origin licensing in late G(1). Mol. Cell 9, 1067-1078.
14. Tanaka, S., and Diffley, J.F. (2002). Deregulated G1-cyclin expression induces genomic instability by preventing efficient preRC formation. Genes Dev. 16, 2639-2649.
15. Michel, B., Flores, M.J., Viguera, E., Grompone, G., Seigneur, M., and Bidnenko, V. (2001). Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8181-8188.
16. Chen, C., and Kolodner, R.D. (1999). Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat. Genet. 23, 81-85.
17. Lea, D.E., and Coulson, C.A. (1948). The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49, 264-285.
18. Scholes, D.T., Banerjee, M., Bowen, B., and Curcio, M.J. (2001). Multiple regulators of Ty1 transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have conserved roles in genome maintenance. Genetics 159, 1449-1465.
19. Cullmann, G., Fien, K., Kobayashi, R., and Stillman, B. (1995). Characterization of the five replication factor C genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4661-4671.
20. Davey, M.J., Jeruzalmi, D., Kuriyan, J., and O'Donnell, M. (2002). Motors and switches: AAA+ machines within the replisome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 826-835.
21. Schmidt, S.L., Pautz, A.L., and Burgers, P.M. (2001). ATP utilization by yeast replication factor C. IV. RFC ATP-binding mutants show defects in DNA replication, DNA repair, and checkpoint regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34792-34800.
22. Podust, L.M., Podust, V.N., Sogo, J.M., and Hubscher, U. (1995). Mammalian DNA polymerase auxiliary proteins: analysis of replication factor C-catalyzed proliferating cell nuclear antigen loading onto circular double-stranded DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3072-3081.
23. Ohta, S., Shiomi, Y., Sugimoto, K., Obuse, C., and Tsurimoto, T. (2002). A proteomics approach to identity proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-binding proteins in human cell lysates. Identification of the human CHL12/RFCs2-5 complex as a novel PCNA-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40362-40367.
24. Majka, J., and Burgers, P.M. (2003). Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2249-2254.
25. Melo, J.A., Cohen, J., and Toczyski, D.P. (2001). Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 15, 2809-2821.
26. Reagan, M.S., Pittenger, C., Siede, W., and Friedberg, E.C. (1995). Characterization of a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a deletion of the RAD27 gene, a structural homolog of the RAD2 nucleotide excision repair gene. J. Bacteriol. 177, 364-371.
27. Formosa, T., and Nittis, T. (1999). Dna2 mutants reveal interactions with Dna polymerase alpha and Ctf4, a Pol alpha accessory factor, and show that full Dna2 helicase activity is not essential for growth. Genetics 151, 1459-1470.
28. Merrill, B.J., and Holm, C. (1999). A requirement for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is caused by DNA replication defects of mec1 mutants. Genetics 153, 595-605.
29. Tishkoff, D.X., Filosi, N., Gaida, G.M., and Kolodner, R.D. (1997). A novel mutation avoidance mechanism dependent on S. cerevisiae RAD27 is distinct from DNA mismatch repair. Cell 88, 253-263.
30. Chen, C., Umezu, K., and Kolodner, R.D. (1998). Chromosomal rearrangements occur in S. cerevisiae rfa1 mutator mutants due to mutagenic lesions processed by double-strand-break repair. Mol. Cell 2, 9-22.
31. Zou, H., and Rothstein, R. (1997). Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell 90, 87-96.
32. Merrill, B.J., and Holm, C. (1998). The RAD52 recombinational repair pathway is essential in pol30 (PCNA) mutants that accumulate small single-stranded DNA fragments during DNA synthesis. Genetics 148, 611-624.
33. Fasullo, M.T., and Davis, R.W. (1987). Recombinational substrates designed to study recombination between unique and repetitive sequences in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6215-6219.
34. Onoda, F., Seki, M., Miyajima, A., and Enomoto, T. (2000). Elevation of sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sgs1 disruptants and the relevance of the disruptants as a system to evaluate mutations in Bloom's syndrome gene. Mutat. Res. 459, 203-209.
35. Lopes, M., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M., Newlon, C.S., and Foiani, M. (2001). The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412, 557-561.
36. Sogo, J.M., Lopes, M., and Foiani, M. (2002). Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297, 599-602.
37. Eckardt-Schupp, F., Siede, W., and Game, J.C. (1987). The RAD24 (= Rs1) gene product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae participates in two different pathways of DNA repair. Genetics 115, 83-90.
38. Weinert, T.A., Kiser, G.L., and Hartwell, L.H. (1994). Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 8, 652-665.
39. Naiki, T., Kondo, T., Nakada, D., Matsumoto, K., and Sugimoto, K. (2001). Chl12 (Ctf18) forms a novel replication factor C-related complex and functions redundantly with Rad24 in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5838-5845.
40. Desany, B.A., Alcasabas, A.A., Bachant, J.B., and Elledge, S.J. (1998). Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12, 2956-2970.
41. Adams, A.K., and Holm, C. (1996). Specific DNA replication mutations affect telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4614-4620.
42. Diede, S.J., and Gottschling, D.E. (1999). Telomerase-mediated telomere addition in vivo requires DNA primase and DNA polymerases alpha and delta. Cell 99, 723-733.
43. Levin, D.S., McKenna, A.E., Motycka, T.A., Matsumoto, Y., and Tomkinson, A.E. (2000). Interaction between PCNA and DNA ligase I is critical for joining of Okazaki fragments and long-patch base-excision repair. Curr. Biol. 10, 919-922.
44. Maga, G., Villani, G., Tillement, V., Stucki, M., Locatelli, G.A., Frouin, I., Spadari, S., and Hubscher, U. (2001). Okazaki fragment processing: modulation of the strand displacement activity of DNA polymerase delta by the concerted action of replication protein A, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and flap endonuclease-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14298-14303.
45. Sporbert, A., Gahl, A., Ankerhold, R., Leonhardt, H., and Cardoso, M.C. (2002). DNA polymerase clamp shows little turnover at established replication sites but sequential de novo assembly at adjacent origin clusters. Mol. Cell 10, 1355-1365.
46. Sun, X., Wu, P., Zheng, L., Thrower, D., Partikian, A., Qiu, J., and Shen, B. (2002). Suppression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad27 null mutant phenotypes by the 5′ nuclease domain of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. Curr. Genet. 41, 379-388.
47. Budd, M.E., and Campbell, J.L. (1997). A yeast replicative helicase, Dna2 helicase, interacts with yeast FEN-1 nuclease in carrying out its essential function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2136-2142.
48. Bae, S.H., and Seo, Y.S. (2000). Characterization of the enzymatic properties of the yeast dna2 Helicase/endonuclease suggests a new model for Okazaki fragment processing. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38022-38031.
49. Brown, E.J., and Baltimore, D. (2000). ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 14, 397-402.
50. Jenne, D.E., Tinschert, S., Stegmann, E., Reimann, H., Nurnberg, P., Horn, D., Naumann, I., Buske, A., and Thiel, G. (2000). A common set of at least 11 functional genes is lost in the majority of NF1 patients with gross deletions. Genomics 66, 93-97.