Interactive teaching: A concept analysis

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 203-209

  Ridley, Renee T ^a,b  

^a MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250693587     PISSN: 01484834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20070501-03     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Ali, J., Adam, R., Josa, D., Pierre, I., Bedaysie, H., West, U., et al. (1999). Comparison of performance of interns completing the old (1993) and new interactive (1997) Advanced Trauma Life Support courses. Journal of Trauma, 46, 80-86.
2. Arwood, L. (2004). Teaching cell biology to nonscience majors through forensics, or how to design a killer course. Cellular Biology Education, 3, 131-138.
3. Baker, C.M. (2000). Problem-based learning for nursing: Integrating lessons from other disciplines with nursing experiences. Journal of Professional Nursing, 16, 258-266.
4. Barrows, H. (n.d.). The PBL learning process. Retrieved June 11, 2005, from http://www.pbli.org/pbl/pbl1.htm
5. Bays, C.L., & Hermann, C.P. (1997). Gaming versus lecture discussion: Effects on students' test performance. Journal of Nursing Education, 36, 292-294.
6. Bernstein, J.L., Scheerhorn, S., & Ritter, S. (2002). Using simulations and collaborative teaching to enhance introductory courses. College Teaching, 50(1), 9-12.
7. Biddulph, F., & Osborne, R. (1984). Making sense of our world: An interactive teaching approach. Hamilton, New Zealand: Science Education Research Unit, University of Waikato.
8. Biley, F. (1999). Creating tension: Undergraduate student nurses' responses to a problem-based learning curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 19, 586-591.
9. Blank, M.A., & Kershaw, C. (1993, April). Perceptions of educators about classroom management demands when using interactive strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
10. Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
11. Copp, S. (2002). Using cooperative learning strategies to teach implications of the Nurse Practice Act. Nurse Educator, 27, 236-241.
12. Cowen, K.J., & Tesh, A.S. (2002). Effects of gaming on nursing students' knowledge of pediatric cardiovascular dysfunction. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 507-509.
13. Department for Education and Employment. (1999). The National Numeracy Strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics. London, UK: DfEE Publications.
14. Diab, S.M. (1990). A comparative study of non-interactive and interactive instructional methods for introductory organic chemistry (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52 (01/B), 0240.
15. Dougal, J., & Gonterman, R. (1999). A comparison of three teaching methods on learning and retention. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 15, 205-209.
16. Elberson, K.L., Vance, A.R., Stephenson, N.L., & Corbett, R.W. (2001). Cooperative learning: A strategy for teaching pathophysiology to undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educator, 26, 259-261.
17. Ficca, M.S. (1999). The congruency between actual and intended teaching strategies used by nursing faculty in BSN programs (Doctoral dissertation, Widener University, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (10/B), 5050.
18. Gilmartin, J. (2001). Teachers' understanding of facilitation styles with student nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38, 481-488.
19. Golub, J.N. (2000). Making learning happen: Strategies for an interactive classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Hartmann, A.C., & Cruz, P.D. (1998). Interactive mechanisms for teaching dermatology to medical students. Archives of Dermatology, 134, 725-728.
22. Heiss, D.G., & Basso, D.M. (2003). Physical therapy on trial: The rationale, organization, and impact of a mock trial on physical therapy students' attitudes toward and confidence in research. Journal of Allied Health, 32, 202-210.
23. Higgs, G.E., Givonetti, R.M., & Williams, R.L. (1995, April). Preferences of participating and non-participating students for different pedagogical methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
24. Jeffries, P.R., Rew, S., & Cramer, J.M. (2002). A comparison of student-centered versus traditional methods of teaching basic nursing skills in a learning laboratory. Nursing Education Perspectives, 23, 14-19.
25. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubex, E.J. (1988). Cooperation in the classroom (Rev. ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
26. Kinzie, M.B. (1990). Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 5-21.
27. Kolb, D.A. (1976). Learning style inventory. Boston: McBer & Co.
28. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Mabry, C.H. (1995). Using cooperative learning principles in BI. Research Strategies, 13, 182-185.
30. Mannison, M., Patton, W., & Lemon, G. (1994). Interactive teaching goes to uni: Keeping students awake and learning alive. Higher Education Research and Development, 13, 35-47.
31. Manuel, P., & Sorenson, L. (1995). Changing trends in healthcare: Implications for baccalaureate education, practice, and employment. Journal of Nursing Education, 34, 248-253.
32. Metcalf, B.L., & Yankou, D. (2003). Using gaming to help nursing students understand ethics. Journal of Nursing Education, 42, 212-215.
33. Miller, S.K. (2003). A comparison of student outcomes following problem-based learning instruction versus traditional lecture learning in a graduate pharmacology course. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 15, 550-556.
34. Nadkarni, S. (2003). Instructional methods and mental models of students: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 335-351.
35. National League for Nursing, (2003). Position statement: Innovation in nursing education: A call to reform. Retrieved October 27, 2004, from http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/ PositionStatements/innovation.htm
36. Pardue, K.T. (2004). Introducing readers theater! A strategy to foster aesthetic knowing in nursing. Nurse Educator, 29, 58-62.
37. Pederson, C.J. (1990). A comparison of structured controversy with lecture in nursing education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (05/B), 2289.
38. Peters, J.M., & Armstrong, J.L. (1998). Collaborative learning: People laboring together to construct knowledge. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 79, 75-85.
39. Peters, M. (2000). Does constructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education? Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 166-172.
40. Pugsley, K.E., & Clayton, L.H. (2003). Traditional lecture or experiential learning: Changing student attitudes. Journal of Nursing Education, 42, 520-523,
41. Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
42. Ridley, R.T. (2004a). Classroom games are COOL: Collaborative opportunities of learning. Nurse Educator, 29, 47-48.
43. Ridley, R.T. (2004b). Creative collaborative clinical quickies. Nurse Educator, 29, 135-136.
44. Sadeo, K., & Robinson, N.B. (2002, April). Teaching the culture of collaboration: The validity of a case-based, interactive teaching methodology in higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
45. Schaefer, K.M., & Zygmont, D. (2003). Analyzing the teaching style of nursing faculty: Does it promote a student-centered or teacher-centered learning environment? Nursing Education Perspectives, 24, 238-245.
46. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
47. Smoyak, S.A. (1972), Simulations and games: A social science innovation for teaching, research, and therapy. In ANA Clinical Sessions (pp. 230-233). New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
48. Sousa, D.A. (1995). How the brain learns. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
49. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Center for Dewey Studies. (2005). Chronology of John Dewey's life and work. Retrieved September 26, 2005, from http://www.siu.edu/~deweyctr/chrono_page.htm
50. Styles, A.S., Johnson, R.K., Trigg, B.K., & Fowler, G. (2004). Cooperative learning: The ugly, the bad, and the good. Nurse Educator, 29, 97-98.
51. Van Dijk, L.A., Van Den Berg, G.C., & Van Keulen, H. (2001). Interactive lectures in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 15-28.
52. Vaughan, J.A. (1990). Student nurse attitudes to teaching/learning methods. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 925-933.
53. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. Wilke, R.R. (2003), The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. Advances in Physiology Education, 27, 207-223.
55. Wilkinson, C., Peters, L., Mitchell, K., Irwin, T., McCorrie, K., & MacLeod, M. (1998). "Being there": Learning through active participation. Nurse Education Today, 18, 226-230.
56. Yoo, M.S., & Yoo, Y. (2003). The effectiveness of standardized patients as a teaching method for nursing fundamentals. Journal of Nursing Education, 42, 444-448.
57. Young, P., & Diekelmann, N. (2002). Learning to lecture: Exploring the skills, strategies, and practices of new teachers in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 405-412.
58. Zak, R. (2004). Continuing medical education: Interactive technology enhances instruction for both teacher and learner. Healthcare Informatics, 21(1), 40.
59. Zakrzewska, J.M., Fry, H., & Larkin, K.E. (2003). A case study of methods used to tackle a common pedagogic problem in medical and dental education: Time pressure. Medical Teaching, 25, 391-397.