Concordancing oneself: Constructing individual textual profiles

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 271-298

  Coniam, David ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Academic discourse; Concordancing; Corpus construction; Stylistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 30044443149     PISSN: 13846655     EISSN: 15699811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.9.2.06con     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aarts, F. (1971). Noun-phrase Types in Clause Structure. Lingua, 26, 281-193
2. Ard, J. (1983). The Role of the Author in Scientific Discourse. Paper presented at the American Applied Linguistics Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, December, 1983
3. Barber, C. (1962). Some Measurable Characteristics of Modern English Prose. In Contributions to English syntax and phonology. Reprinted in J. M. Swales (Ed.) (1985), Episodes in ESP (pp. 1-21). Oxford: Pergamon
4. Barlow, M. (2003). MonoConc Pro. Houston: Athelstan Publications. Available at http://www.athel.com/
5. Barnbrook, G. (1996). Language and Computers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
6. BBC English Dictionary. (1992). London: HarperCollins
7. Beaugrande, R. de (2001). Interpreting the Discourse of H.G. Widdowson: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1), 104-121
8. Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8, 243-257
9. Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. British National Corpus. (1999). BNC Sampler Corpus. Available at http://www.hcu.ox.ac.uk/BNC/getting/sampler.html
11. Cambridge International Dictionary of English. (1995). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12. Can, F., & Patton, J. M. (2004). Change of Writing Style with Time. Computers and the Humanities, 38 (1), 61-82
13. Collins COBUILD English Dictionary. (1995). London: HarperCollins
14. Compulang.com (2002). WordPilot 2002. http://www.compulang.com/. 30 Jan, 2003
15. Coniam, D. (1997). A Practical Introduction to Corpora in a Teacher Training Language Awareness Programme. Language Awareness, 6 (4), 199-207
16. Craig, H. (1999). Authorial attribution and computational stylistics: If you can tell authors apart, have you learned anything about them? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 14 (1), 103-113
17. Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19 (1), 61-74
18. Emmott, C. (2002). Split selves in fiction and in medical life stories: Cognitive linguistic theory and narrative practice. In E. Semino & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive Stylistics (pp. 153-181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
19. Ewer, J. (1971). Further Notes on Developing an English Programme for Students of Science and Technology 1. English Language Teaching, 26 (1), 65-70
20. Ewer, J., & Hughes-Davies, E. (1972). Further Notes on Developing an English Programme for Students of Science and Technology 2. English Language Teaching, 26 (3), 269-273
21. Ewer, J., & Latorre, G. (1969). A Course in Basic Scientific English. London: Longman
22. Fletcher, W. (2002). kfNgram. Available at http://miniappolis.com/ KWiCFinder/kfNgramHelp.html
23. Flowerdew, L. (2002). Corpus-based Analyses in EAP. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 95-114). London: Longman
24. Francis, G. (1994). Grammar teaching in schools: What should teachers be aware of? Language Awareness, 3, 221-236
25. Ghadessy, M., Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. L. (Eds.). (2001). Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice. John Benjamins: Amsterdam
26. Ghadessy, M., Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. L. (2001). Introduction. In M. Ghadessy et al. (Eds.), Small corpus studies and ELT: Theory and Practice (pp. xvii-xxiii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
27. Goatly, A. (2000). Critical Reading and Writing. London: Routledge
28. Granger, S. (1998). The Computer Learner Corpus: a Versatile New Source of Data for SLA Research. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 3-18). London: Longman
29. Granger. S. & Tribble, C. (1998). Learner Corpus Data in the Foreign Language Classroom: Form-focused Instruction and Data-driven Learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 199-209). London: Longman
30. Herbert, A. (1965). The Structure of Technical English. London: Longman
31. Hoover, D. L. (2003). Frequent Collocations and Authorial Style. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18 (3), 261-286
32. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
33. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses. Harlow, England: Pearson Education
34. Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 23, 215-239
35. Ivanic, R., & Simpson, J. (1992). Who's Who in Academic Writing. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 141-173). London: Longman
36. Kennedy, C. (1983). An ESP Approach to EFL/ESL Teacher Training. ESP Journal, 2 (1), 73-85
37. Kennedy, C. (1995). Wish You Were Here: 'Little' Texts and Language Awareness. Language Awareness, 4, 161-172
38. Kennedy, G. & Yamazaki, S. (2000). The Influence of Maori on the New Zealand English Lexicon. In J. M. Kirk (Ed.), Corpora galore: analyses and techniques in describing English: Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (pp. 33-44). Amsterdam: Rodopi
39. Khmelev, D. V., & Tweedie, F. J. (2001). Using Markov chains for identification of writers. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16 (3), 299-307
40. Kilgariff, A. (1997). Using Word Frequency Lists to Measure Corpus Homogeneity and Similarity Between Corpora. Proceedings of the Fifth ACL Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Beijing and Hong Kong, August 1997
41. Kilgariff, A. (2001). Comparing Corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 6 (1), 97-133
42. Koppel, M., Argamon, S. & Shimoni, A. R. (2002). Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17 (4), 401-412
43. Kuo, C. (1998). The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 121-138
44. Lackstrom, J., Selinker, L. & Trimble, L. (1972). Grammar and Technical English. English Teaching Forum, 10 (5), 3-14
45. Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1975). A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman
46. Longman Language Activator. (1993). Harlow: Longman
47. MacDonald, N., Frase, L., Gingrich, P., & Keenan, S. (1982). The Writer's Workbench: Computer Aids for Text Analysis. Educational Psychologist, 17, 172-179
48. Makaya, P. & Bloor, T. (1987). Playing Safe with Predictions: Hedging, Attribution and Conditions in Economic Forecasting. Written Language: British Studies in Applied Linguistics, No. 2. London: CILT/BAAL
49. McEnery, A.M., Baker, J.P. & Hardie, J. (2000). 'Assessing Claims about Language Use with Corpus Data - Swearing and Abuse'. In J. M. Kirk (Ed.), Corpora Galore: analyses and techniques in describing English (pp. 45-55). Amsterdam: Rodopi
50. McEnery, T. & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
51. Oakes, M. P. (1998). Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
52. Ooi, V. B. Y. (2000). Asian or Western Realities? Collocations in Singaporean-Malaysian English. In J. M. Kirk (Ed.), Corpora galore: analyses and techniques in describing English (pp. 73-89). Amsterdam: Rodopi
53. Partington, A. (1996). Patterns and Meanings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
54. Perera, K. (1984). Children's Writing and Reading - Analysing Classroom Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
55. Qiao, H. & Sussex, R. (1996). Using the Longman Miniconcordancer on Tagged and Parsed Corpora with Special Reference to their Use as an Aid to Grammar Learning. SYSTEM, 24 (1), 41-64
56. Rayson, P. & Garside, R. (2000). Comparing Corpora using Frequency Profiling. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, held in Conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2000 (pp. 1-6). 1-8 October 2000, Hong Kong
57. Renouf, A. (1987). Corpus Development. In J. M. Sinclair (Ed.), Looking up (pp. 1-40). London: Collins ELT
58. Scott, M. (1996). WordSmith Tools, version 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press
59. Scott, M. (2001). Comparing Corpora and Identifying Key Words, Collocations, and Frequency Distributions through the WordSmith Tools Suite of Computer Programs. In M. Ghadessy, A. Henry, & R. L. Roseberry (Eds.), Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory And Practice (pp. 47-67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
60. Sinclair, J. (Ed.) (1987). Looking up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing, London: Collins ELT
61. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
62. Sinclair, J. (2001). Preface. In Ghadessy, M. et al. (Eds.), Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice (pp. vii-xv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
63. Smith, J. A. & Kelly, C. (2002). Stylistic Constancy and Change Across Literary Corpora: Using Measures of Lexical Richness to Date Works. Computers and the Humanities, 36 (4), 411-430
64. Spencer, M., Bordalejo, B., Wang, L.S., Barbrook, A.C., Mooney, L.R., Robinson, P., Warnow, T. & Howe, C.J. (2003). Analyzing the Order of Items in Manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales. Computers and the Humanities, 37 (1), 97-109
65. Swales, J. (1985). Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon
66. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
67. Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S. & Icke, V. (1981). On the Use of the Passive in Two Astrophysics Papers. ESP Journal, 1 (2), 123-140
68. Ure, J. (1971). Lexical Density and Register Differentiation. In G. Perren & J. Trim (Eds.), Applications of Linguistics (pp. 443-452). London: Cambridge University Press
69. Whissell, C. & Sigelman, L. (2001). The Times and the Man as Predictors of Emotion and Style in the Inaugural Addresses of U.S. Presidents. Computers and the Humanities, 35 (3), 255-272
70. Widdowson, H. (2000). On the Limitations of Linguistics Applied. Applied Linguistics, 21 (1), 3-25
71. Woods, M. J. (2001). Spanish Word Frequency: A Historical Surprise. Computers and the Humanities, 35 (2), 231-236