A Bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 6, Issue , 2002, Pages 3-33

  Granger, Sylviane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85127251047     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Aarts J., & Granger, S. (1998). Tag sequences in learner corpora: a key to interlanguage grammar and discourse. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 132–141).
2. Anthone, A. (1996). Patterns of French/English Conjunct Use in Original and Translated Journalese. Université Catholique de Louvain: unpublished MA dissertation.
3. Atkins, S., & Clear, J. (1992). Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 7(1), 1–16.
4. Biber, D. (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Investigating Language and Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1994). Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 169–189.
7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
8. Chuquet, H., & Paillard, M. (1987). Approches linguistiques des problèmes de traduction anglais>
9. Dagneaux, E., Denness, S., & Granger, S. (1998). Computer-aided error analysis. System. An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 163–174.
10. Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Flowerdew, J. (2000). Computer-assisted analysis of language learner diaries: a qualitative application of word frequency and concordancing software. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora- TALC 2000, Graz, 19–23, July 2000, 27.
12. Granger, S. (1994). The learner corpus: a revolution in applied linguistics. English Today, 39(10/3), 25–29.
13. Granger, S. (1997). Automated retrieval of passives from native and learner corpora: precision and recall. Journal of English Linguistics, 25(4), 365–374.
14. Granger, S. (Ed.). (1998). Learner English on Computer. London and New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
15. Granger, S. (1999). Use of tenses by advanced EFL learners: evidence from an error-tagged computer corpus. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 191–202). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
16. Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., & Meunier, F. (in press). International Corpus of Learner English. CD-ROM & Handbook. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
17. Granger, S., & Rayson, P. (1998). Automatic profiling of learner texts. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 119–131).
18. Granger, S., & Tribble, C. (1998). Learner corpus data in the foreign language classroom: form-focused instruction and data-driven learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 119–131).
19. Granger, S., & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, 15, 19–29.
20. Granger, S., Vandeventer, A., & Hamel, M.-J. (2001). Analyse de corpus d’apprenants pour l’ELAO basé sur le TAL. Linguistique de Corpus. Special issue of Traitement automatique des langues, 42(2), 609–621.
21. Granger, S., & Wynne, M. (1999). Optimising measures of lexical variation in EFL learner corpora. In J. Kirk (Ed.), Corpora Galore (pp. 249–257). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
22. de Haan, P. (1998). English writing by Dutch-speaking students. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora, (pp. 203–212). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
23. de Haan, P. (2000). Tagging non-native English with the TOSCA-ICLE tagger. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 69–79). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
24. Hasselgard, H. (1999). Review of S. Granger (Ed.) Learner English on Computer. ICAME Journal, 23, 148–152.
25. James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use. Exploring Error Analysis. London & New York: Longman.
26. Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded – two examples of data-driven learning materials. English Language Research Journal, 4, 1–16.
27. Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar (pp. 293–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kennedy, G. (1998). An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London & New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
29. Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 105–122). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Leech, G. (1993). Corpus annotation schemes. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 275–281.
31. Leech, G. (1998). Learner corpora: what they are and what can be done with them. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. xiv–xx).
32. Longman Essential Activator. (1997). Addison Wesley Longman.
33. Lorenz, G. (1999). Adjective Intensification – Learners vs Native Speakers. A Corpus Study of Argumentative Writing. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
34. Mark, K. L. (1998). The significance of learner corpus data in relation to the problems of language teaching. Bulletin of General Education, 312, 77–90.
35. Massart, D. (1998). The Use of Phrasal Verbs by EFL Learners. A Cross-linguistic Approach. Université Catholique de Louvain. Unpublished MA dissertation.
36. McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
37. Menzel, W., Atwell, E., Bonaventura, P., Herron, D., Howarth, P., Morton, R. & Souter, C. (2000). The ISLE corpus of non-native spoken English. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 31 May-2 June 2000, Athens.
38. Meunier, F. (1998). Computer tools for interlanguage analysis: a critical approach. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 19–37).
39. Meunier, F. (2000). A computer corpus linguistics approach to interlanguage grammar: noun phrase complexity in advanced learner writing. Unpublished PhD thesis. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve. Centre for English Corpus Linguistics.
40. Milton, J. (1998a). Exploiting L1 and interlanguage corpora in the design of an electronic language learning and production environment. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 186–198).
41. Milton, J. (1998b). WORDPILOT: enabling learners to navigate lexical universes. In S. Granger & J. Hung (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 97–98). The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
42. Milton, J., & Chowdury, N. (1994). Tagging the interlanguage of Chinese learners of English. In L. Flowerdew & K. K. Tong (Eds.), Entering Text (pp. 127–143). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
43. de Mönnink, I. (2000). Parsing a learner corpus? In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 81–90). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
44. de Mönnink, I., & Meunier, F. (2001). Assessing the success rate of EFL learner corpus tagging. In S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, S. Granger & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English Conference, ICAME 2001: Future Challenges for Corpus Linguistics (pp. 59–60). Centre for English Corpus Linguistics, Université catholique de Louvain.
45. Murison-Bowie, S. (1996). Linguistic corpora and language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 182–199.
46. Rundell, M., & Stock, P. (1992). The corpus revolution. English Today, 30, 9–14.
47. Scott, M. (1996). WordSmith Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press: http://oup.com/elt/global/isbn/6890
48. Seidlhofer, B. (2000). Towards the teaching of lingua franca English: The Vienna ELF Corpus. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (TALC 2000), Graz, 19–23 July, 2000.
49. Sinclair, J. (1996). EAGLES. Preliminary recommendations on Corpus Typology. http://www.ilc.pi.it/EAGLES96/corpustyp/corpustyp.html
50. Sökmen, A. J. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmidt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary. Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 237–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Spence, R. (1998). A corpus of student L1–L2 translations. In S. Granger & J. Hung (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 110–112). Hong-Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
52. Sridhar, K. K., & Sridhar, S. N. (1986). Bridging the Gap: Second Language Acquisition Theory and Indigenized Varieties of English. World Englishes, 5(1), 3–14.
53. Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Widdowson, H. G. (1991). The description and prescription of language. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics. Language, Communication and Social Meaning. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
55. Widdowson, H. G. (1997). EIL, ESL, EFL: global issues and local interests. World Englishes, 16(1), 135–146.