A look at groups from the functional perspective

Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 21-62

  Hollingshead, Andrea B ^a   Wittenbaum, Gwen M ^b   Paulus, Paul B ^c   Hirokawa, Randy Y ^d   Ancona, Deborah G ^e   Peterson, Randall S ^f   Jehn, Karen A ^g   Yoon, Kay ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^f LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^g LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646458818     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483328935.n2     Document Type: Chapter

References (182)

1. Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 2, 217-230.
2. Allen, T. J. (1984). Managing the flow of technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within R & D organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 74, 33-52. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2748
4. Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148. doi:10.2307/256633 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256633
5. Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253. doi:10.1108/eb022745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022745
6. Ancona, D. (1990). Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 334-365. doi:10.2307/256328 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256328
7. Ancona, D., Bresman, H., & Kaufer, K. (2002). The comparative advantage of X-teams. Sloan Management Review, 43, 33-39
8. Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1992). Bringing the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665. doi:10.2307/2393475 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393475
9. Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (2000). Compose teams to assure successful boundary activity. In E. A.Locke (Ed.), The handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 199-210). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10. Ancona, D., & Chong, C. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. In B. M.Staw & L. L.Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 251-284). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11. Ancona, D., & Chong, C. (1999). Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. In R.Wageman (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Groups in context (Vol. 2, pp. 33-48). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
12. Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495. doi:10.1037/h0059886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0059886
13. Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 25-36. doi:10.1007/BF01390436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01390436
14. Baron, R. S., Kerr, N. L., & Miller, N. (1992). Group process, group decision, group action. Buckingham, UK/Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
15. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377
16. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62
17. Bartis, S. P., Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1988). Evaluation and performance: A two-edged knife. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 242-251. doi:10.1177/0146167288142003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167288142003
18. Bass, B. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press/Macmillan.
19. Becker, S. W., & Baloff, N. (1969). Organization structure and complex problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 260-271. doi:10.2307/2391104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391104
20. Berdahl, J. L. (1998). The dynamics of composition and socialization in small groups: Insights gained from developing a computational model. In M. A.Neale, E. A.Mannix, & D.H Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing in groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 209-227). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21. Bond, M. H., & Shiu, W. Y. (1997). The relationship between a group's personality resources and the two dimensions of its group process. Small Group Research, 28, 194-217. doi:10.1177/1046496497282002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496497282002
22. Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In B. R.Burleson & A. W.Kunkel (Eds.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 20, pp. 227-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31, 305-327. doi:10.1177/104649640003100303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100303
24. Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Spatial relationships in small groups. In R. S.Cathcart & L. A.Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 287-300). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
25. Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071
26. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. W. (1968). Group dynamics research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
27. Collins, B. E., & Guetzkow, H. (1964). A social psychology of group processes for decision-making. New York: John Wiley.
28. Cosier, R. A., & Rose, G. L. (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 378-391. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90071-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073%2877%2990071-X
29. Coskun, H. (2000). The effects of outgroup comparison, social context, intrinsic motivation, and collective identity in brainstorming groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Arlington.
30. Cragan, J. W., & Wright, D. W. (1990). Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique. Communication Studies, 41, 212-236. doi:10.1080/10510979009368305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979009368305
31. Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Ruback, R. B. (1987). Dimensions of group process: Amount and structure of group interaction. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 123-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125. doi:10.1037/h0033951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033951
33. Davis, J. H. (1980). Group decision and procedural justice. In M.Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 157-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Davis, J. H. (1982). Social interaction as a combinatorial process in group decision. In H.Brandstatter, J. H.Davis, & G.Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 27-58). London: Academic Press.
35. Davis, J. H., Kameda, T., Parks, C., Stasson, M., & Zimmerman, S. (1989). Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1000-1012. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1000
36. De Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191-1201. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191
37. Deutsch, M. (1969). Conflicts: Productive and destructive. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 7-41. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb02576.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb02576.x
38. Devine, D. J. (1999). Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 608-634. doi:10.1177/104649649903000506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000506
39. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678-711. doi:10.1177/104649649903000602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000602
40. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
41. Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580-587. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.580
42. Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722-735. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
43. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.125
44. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T.Eckes & H. M.Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Filardo, E. K. (1996). Gender patterns in African American and white adolescents' social interactions in same-race, mixed-gender groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71, 71-82. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.71 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.71
46. Fisher, B. A. (1970). The process of decision modification in small group discussion groups. Journal of Communication, 20, 51-64. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00863.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00863.x
47. Gladstein, D. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517. doi:10.2307/2392936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392936
48. Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). The role of communication in decision-making groups: A functional perspective. In M. S.Mander (Ed.), Communications in transition (pp. 168-185). New York: Praeger.
49. Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1986). The counteractive functions of communication in effective group decision-making. In R. Y.Hirokawa & M. S.Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 81-90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50. Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1996). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In R. Y.Hirokawa & M. S.Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (2nd ed., pp. 55-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Gouran, D. S., Hirokawa, R. Y., Julian, K. M., & Leatham, G. B. (1993). The evolution and current status of the functional perspective on communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: A critical analysis. Communication Yearbook, 16, 573-600.
52. Griffin, E. A. (2000). A first look at communication theory (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0061
54. Guetzkow, H., & Gyr, J. (1954). An analysis of conflict in decision-making groups. Human Relations, 7, 367-381. doi:10.1177/001872675400700307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700307
55. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W.Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57. Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
58. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
59. Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111. doi:10.2307/2667032 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667032
60. Herek, G., Janis, I. L., & Huth, P. (1987). Decision making during international crises: Is quality of process related to outcome? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 203-226. doi:10.1177/0022002787031002001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002787031002001
61. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.705
62. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processes. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
63. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1980a). A comparative analysis of communication patterns within effective and ineffective decision-making groups. Communication Monographs, 47, 312-321. doi:10.1080/03637758009376040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758009376040
64. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1980b). A function-oriented analysis of small group interaction within effective and ineffective decision-making groups: An exploratory investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
65. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1982). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness I: A critical review of inconsistent findings. Communication Quarterly, 30, 134-141. doi:10.1080/01463378209369440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463378209369440
66. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness II: An exploratory investigation of procedural functions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 59-74. doi:10.1080/10570318309374105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374105
67. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: A test of a functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 12, 203-224. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00073.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00073.x
68. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487-515. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00165.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00165.x
69. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1990). The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy: A task-contingency perspective. Small Group Research, 21, 190-204. doi:10.1177/1046496490212003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496490212003
70. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1999). From the tiny pond to the big ocean: Studying communication and group decision-making from a functional perspective. Lecture conducted at B. Aubrey Fisher Memorial, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
71. Hirokawa, R. Y., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (1996). Communication and group decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452243764 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243764
72. Hirokawa, R. Y., & Rost, K. M. (1992). Effective group decision making in organizations: Field test of the vigilant interaction theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 267-288. doi:10.1177/0893318992005003001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318992005003001
73. Hirokawa, R. Y., & Scheerhorn, D. R. (1986). Communication in faulty group decision-making. In R. Y.Hirokawa & M. S.Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 63-80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
74. Hoffman, L.R., & Maier, R.F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solving by members of homogenous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401-407. doi:10.1037/h0044025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0044025
75. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996a). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x
76. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996b). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 181-193. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0098
77. Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1080-1089. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080
78. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333. doi:10.1177/1046496493243003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496493243003
79. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Hurst, A. G., Stein, K. B., Korchin, S. J., & Soskin, W. F. (1978). Leadership style determinants of cohesiveness in adolescent groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 28, 263-277.
81. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. In S.Worchel, W.Wood, & J. A.Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 138-173). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
82. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
83. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
84. Janis, I. L. (1985). Sources of error in strategic decision making. In J. M.Pennings (Ed.), Organizational strategy and change (pp. 157-197). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
85. Janis, I. L. (1989). Crucial decisions: Leadership in policy-making and management. New York: Free Press.
86. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
87. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282. doi:10.2307/2393638 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393638
88. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 520-557. doi:10.2307/2393737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393737
89. Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287-305. doi:10.1108/eb022799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022799
90. Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251. doi:10.2307/3069453 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069453
91. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763. doi:10.2307/2667054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667054
92. Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 775-790. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775
93. Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 542-571. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90045-L http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2892%2990045-L
94. Katz, R., Tushman, M., & Allen, T. J. (1995). The influence of supervisory promotion and network location on subordinate careers in a dual ladder RD & E setting. Management Science, 41, 848-863. doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.5.848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.5.848
95. Kelly, J. R., Jackson, J. W., & Hutson-Comeaux, S. L. (1997). The effects of time pressure and task differences on influence modes and accuracy in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 10-22. doi:10.1177/0146167297231002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231002
96. Kelly, J. R., & Karau, S. J. (1999). Group decision making: The effects of initial preferences and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1342-1354. doi:10.1177/0146167299259002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299259002
97. Kiesler, S. (1978). Interpersonal processes in groups and organizations. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM Publishing.
98. Kirchler, E., & Davis, J. H. (1986). The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 83-91. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.83 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.83
99. Kramer, T. J., Fleming, G. P., & Mannis, S. M. (2001). Improving face-to-face brainstorming through modeling and facilitation. Small Group Research, 32, 533-557. doi:10.1177/104649640103200502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200502
100. Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 175-184. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1203_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1203_2
101. Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. S., & Franz, T. M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.315
102. Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M.Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
103. Laughlin, P. R. (1988). Collective induction: Group performance, social combination processes, and mutual majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 254-267. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.254
104. Laughlin, P. R. (1999). Collective induction: Twelve postulates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 50-69. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2854
105. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2886%2990022-3
106. Laughlin, P. R., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1995). A theory of collective induction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 94-107. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1008
107. Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50. doi:10.1037/h0057189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0057189
108. LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.803
109. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
110. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts (Rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.
111. Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. (1955). Two models of group behavior in the solution of Eureka-type problems. Psychometrika, 20, 139-148. doi:10.1007/BF02288986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02288986
112. Manz, C., & Sims, H. (1993). Business without bosses: How self-managing teams are building high-performing companies. New York: John Wiley.
113. McClure, B. A., & Foster, C. D. (1991). Group work as a method of promoting cohesiveness within a women's gymnastics team. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 307-313. doi:10.2466/pms.1991.73.1.307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1991.73.1.307
114. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
115. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174. doi:10.1177/1046496491222001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222001
116. McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95-105. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_8
117. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues, and an agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
118. McGrath, J. E., & Rotchford, N. L. (1983). Time and behavior in organizations. In L. L.Cummings & B. M.Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 57-101). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
119. McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.706
120. Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. B.Paulus & B.Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 32-62). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0003
121. Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L.Thompson, J.Levine, & D.Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
122. Moynihan, L. M., & Peterson, R. S. (2001). A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 327-378. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23008-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085%2801%2923008-1
123. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
124. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-23. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1
125. Mulvey, P. W., & Ribbens, B. A. (1999). The effects of intergroup competition and assigned group goals on group efficacy and group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 651-677. doi:10.1177/104649649903000601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000601
126. Nemeth, C. J., Brown, K., & Rogers, J. (2001). Devil's advocate versus authentic dissent: Stimulating quantity and quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 707-720. doi:10.1002/ejsp.58 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.58
127. Nijstad, B. A., Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea generating groups. In P. B.Paulus & B. A.Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 137-159). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0007
128. Orlitzky, M., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To err is human, to correct for it divine: A meta-analysis of research testing the functional theory of group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32, 313-341. doi:10.1177/104649640103200303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200303
129. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York: Scribner.
130. Pate, S., Watson, W. E., & Johnson, L. (1998). The effects of competition on the decision quality of diverse and non-diverse groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 912-923. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01659.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01659.x
131. Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237-262. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013
132. Paulus, P. B. (in press). Fostering creativity in groups and teams. In C.Ford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
133. Paulus, P. B., Dugosh, K. L., Dzindolet, M. T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V. L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming: Predicting production gains and losses. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 299-325. doi:10.1080/14792772143000094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000094
134. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89. doi:10.1177/0146167293191009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167293191009
135. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Dzindolet, M. T. (2000). Creativity in groups and teams. In M.Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 319-338). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
136. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249-265.
137. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., Putman, V. L., Leggett, K. L., & Roland, E. J. (1996). Social influence process in computer brainstorming. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 3-14. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1801_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1801_2
138. Pavitt, C. (1994). Theoretical commitments presupposed by functional approaches to group discussion. Small Group Research, 25, 520-541. doi:10.1177/1046496494254006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496494254006
139. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194-208. doi:10.2307/2091811 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2091811
140. Peterson, R. S., Owens, P. D., & Martorana, P. V. (1999). The group dynamics q-sort in organizational research: A new method for studying familiar problems. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 107-136. doi:10.1177/109442819922001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442819922001
141. Phillip, H., & Dunphy, D. (1959). Developmental trends in small groups. Sociometry, 22, 162-174. doi:10.2307/2786020 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786020
142. Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R. B., & Hoppen, N. (1999). Electronic brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Information Systems Research, 10, 110-133. doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.2.110
143. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1988). Decision development in small groups: IV. A typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00188.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00188.x
144. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups: V. Test of a contingency model. Human Communication Research, 15, 549-589. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00199.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00199.x
145. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918
146. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
147. Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R & D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502-517. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637
148. Roby, T. B., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1958). Considerations in the analysis of group tasks, Psychological Bulletin, 55, 88-101. doi:10.1037/h0047233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047233
149. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745-772. doi:10.2307/256567 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256567
150. Scott, S. (1997). Social identification in product and process development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 97-127. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00007-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748%2897%2900007-6
151. Shaw, M. E. (1964). Communication networks. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 111-147). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
152. Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
153. Stanne, M. B., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 133-154. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.133
154. Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. L.Thompson, J. M.Levine, & D. M.Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 49-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
155. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426
156. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1012
157. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
158. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81
159. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
160. Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1998). The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The role of an informed minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 95-113. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1<95::AID-EJSP847>3.0.CO;2-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0992%28199801/02%2928:1%3C95::AID-EJSP847%3E3.0.CO;2-0
161. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
162. Stohl, C., & Holmes, M. (1993). A functional perspective for bona fide groups. Communication Yearbook, 16, 601-614.
163. Sundstrom, E. (1999). Supporting work team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
164. Tajfel, H. (1982). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
165. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
166. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administration therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
167. Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In N. J.Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
168. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399. doi:10.1037/h0022100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
169. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1024
170. Valacich, J. S., & Schwenk, C. (1995). Devil's advocate and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 158-173. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1070
171. Wageman, R. (2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12(5), 559-578.
172. Waller, M. J., Conte, J. M., Gibson, C. A., & Carpenter, M. A. (2001). The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review, 26, 586-600.
173. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602. doi:10.2307/256593 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256593
174. Waung, M., & Brice, T. S. (1998). The effects of conscientiousness and opportunity to caucus on group performance. Small Group Research, 29, 624-634. doi:10.1177/1046496498295005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496498295005
175. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B.Mullen & G. R.Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9
176. Weingart, L. R., & Jehn, K. (2000). Managing intra-team conflict through collaboration. In E. A.Locke (Ed.), The handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 226-238). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
177. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Electronic communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151. doi:10.2307/256623 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256623
178. Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.371
179. Wittenbaum, G. M. (2000). The bias toward discussing shared information: Why are high status group members immune? Communication Research, 27, 379-401. doi:10.1177/009365000027003005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365000027003005
180. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.967
181. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L.Nye & A. M.Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
182. Wittenbaum, G. M., Vaughan, S. I., & Stasser, G. (1998). Coordination in task-performing groups. In R. S.Tindale & L.Heath (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups: Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 4, pp. 177-204). New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/0-306-47144-2_9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47144-2_9