The relationship between a group's personality resources and the two dimensions of its group process

Small Group Research

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 194-217

  Bond, Michael Harris ^a   Shiu, Winnie Yin Fong ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031494326     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496497282002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Albright, L., Dong, Q., Malloy, T. E., Kenny, D. A., & Yu, D. (1994). Interpersonal perception at zero acquaintance in Chinese culture. Unpublished manuscript, Westfield State College, Pennsylvania.
2. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
3. Batrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
4. Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479-504.
5. Bunce, D., & West, M. A. (1995). Self perceptions and perceptions of group climate as predictions of individual innovation at work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44(3), 199-215.
6. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823-850.
7. Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sports groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
8. Cheng, C., Bond, M. H., & Chan, S. C. (1995). The perception of ideal best friends by Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 91-108.
9. Cheng, C., Cheng, P.Y.L., Ng, C.M.A., & Yip, J.J.F. (1991). Validation of the eight-factor model of Chinese personality perception. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
10. Cheung, I.W.S. (1994). Exploring individual differences in self-perception personality and perceptions of sex-stereotypes. Unpublished bachelor's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
11. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Work and personality: Use of the NEO PI-R in industrial/organizational psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 225-241.
12. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
14. Dyer, W. B. (1977). Team-building: Issues and alternatives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Feingold, A. (1995). The additive effects of differences in central tendency and variability are important in comparisons between groups. American Psychologist, 50(1), 5-13.
16. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
17. George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107-116.
18. George, J. M. (1992). The role of personality in organizational life: Issues and evidence. Journal of Management, 18(2), 185-213.
19. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
20. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.
21. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
23. Haggard, E. A. (1958). Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. New York: Dryden.
24. Hagstrom, W. O., & Selvin, H. C. (1965). The dimension of cohesiveness in small groups. Sociometry, 28, 30-43.
25. Hoffman, L. R. (1959). Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 27-32.
26. Hofstede, G., Bond, M. H. & Luk, C. L. (1993). Individual perceptions of organizational cultures: A methodological treatise on levels of analysis. Organization Studies, 14, 483-583.
27. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
28. Hoyle, R. H., & Crawford, A. M. (1994). Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena: Issues and strategies. Small Group Research, 25(4), 464-485.
29. Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., & Cooper, D. M. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
30. Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 715-726.
31. Lee, R. (1995). A longitudinal study of friendship development in Hong Kong. Unpublished master's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
32. Littlepage, G. E., Cowart, L., & Kerr, B. (1989). Relationships between group environment scales and group performance and cohesiveness. Small Group Behavior, 20(1), 50-61.
33. Luk, C. L., & Bond, M. H. (1992). Explaining Chinese self-esteem in terms of the self-concept. Psychologia, 35, 147-154.
34. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
35. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337.
36. Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1995). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.
37. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272-280.
38. Piper, W. E., Marrache, M., LaCroix, R., Richardsen, A. M., & Jones, B. D. (1983). Cohesiveness as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36, 93-108.
39. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
40. Smith, P. B., Misumi, J., Tayeb, M., Peterson, M., & Bond, M. (1989). On the generality of leadership style measures. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 97-109.
41. Smith, P. B., & Noakes, J. (1995). Cultural differences in group processes. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 477-501). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
42. Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503-530.
43. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
44. Tziner, A. (1982). Group cohesiveness: A dynamic perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 205-211.
45. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelson, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
46. Watson, W. E., & Michaelson, L. K. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect group performance on an intellective task. Group and Organization Studies, 13(4), 495-516.
47. Watson, W. E., Michaelson, L. K., & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 803-809.
48. Wheeless, L. R., Wheeless, V. E., & Dickson-Markwan, F. (1982). The relations among social and task perceptions in small groups. Small Group Behavior, 13(3), 373-384.
49. Yik, M.S.M. (1993). Self and peer ratings of personality traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity among Hong Kong university students. Unpublished master's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
50. Yik, M.S.M., & Bond, M. H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology, 28, 75-95.
51. Zaccaro, S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(3), 387-399.
52. Zaccaro, S. J., & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(4), 547-558.