Improving face-to-face brainstorming through modeling and facilitation

Small Group Research

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 533-557

  Kramer, Thomas J ^a   Fleming, Gerard P ^a   Mannis, Scott M ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035471077     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640103200502     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 527-534.
3. Connolly, T., Routhieux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of one underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490-503.
4. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
5. Devoe, D. B. (1967). Alternatives to handprinting in the manual entry of data. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 8, 21-32.
6. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
7. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
8. Dillon, P. C., Graham, W. K., & Aidells, A. L. (1972). Brainstorming on a "hot" problem: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 487-490.
9. Doyle, M., & Straus, D. (1982). How to make meetings work. New York: Berkley.
10. Flanders, J. P. (1968). A review of research in imitation behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 316-337.
11. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). New York: Prentice Hall.
12. Madsen, D. B., & Finger, J. R., Jr. (1978). Comparison of a written feedback procedure, group brainstorming, and individual brainstorming. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 120-123.
13. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
14. Offner, A. K., Kramer, T. J., & Winter, J. P. (1996). The effects of facilitation, recording and pauses upon group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 283-298.
15. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
16. Oxley, N. L., Dzindolet, M. T., & Paulus, P. B. (1996). XXX of brainstorming groups. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 1-14.
17. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249-265.
18. Roy, M. C., Gauvin, S., & Limayem, M. (1996). Electronic group brainstorming: The role of feedback on productivity. Small Group Research, 27, 215-247.
19. Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity loss in idea generating groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 271-304.
20. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
21. Thompson, L. L. (1999). Making the team: A guide for managers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Walters, G. A., & Miles, R. E. (1972). The impact of group participation plus videotape feedback on self-acceptance scores. Small Group Behavior, 5, 356-364.
23. Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In G. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253-276). New York: Springer-Verlag.