Feature selection for descriptor based classification models. 1. Theory and GA-SEC algorithm

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 921-930

  Wegner, Jörg K ^a   Fröhlich, Holger ^a   Zell, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BENCHMARKING; ENTROPY; ERROR ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK MANAGEMENT;

BIOINFORMATICS; CHEMOINFORMATICS; FEATURE-SELECTION FILTERS; MODEL QUALITY;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 2942704287     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0342324     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Davies, S.; Russell, S. Np-completeness of searches for smallest possible feature sets, Proceedings of the 1994 AAAI Fall Symposium on Relevance. AAAI Press: New Orleans, 1994; pp 37-39.
2. Li, M.; Vitanyi, P. Inductive Reasoning and Kolmogorov Complexity. J. Comput, System Sci. 1992, 44, 343-384.
3. Domingos, P. The Role of Occam's Razor in Knowledge Discovery. Data Min. Knowledge Discov. 1999, 3, 409-425.
4. Vapnik, V. N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory; Springer-Verlag: New York, U.S.A., 1995.
5. Goutte, C. Statistical Learning and Regularisation for Regression, Dissertation, Paris, France, 1997.
6. Wegner, J.; Zell, A. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility and Partition Coefficient Optimized by a Genetic Algorithm Based Descriptor Selection Method. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1077-1084.
7. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J.; Green, D. V. S. Selecting Combinatorial Libraries to Optimize Diversity and Physical Properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 169-177.
8. Kohavi, R. Wrappers for Performance Enhancement and Oblivious Decision Graphs, Dissertation, Stanford University, 1995.
9. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors; Wiley-VCH: D-69469 Weinheim, Germany, 2000; ISBN 3-52-29913-0.
10. Trigg, L. Designing Similarity Functions, Dissertation, University of Waikato: New Zealand, 1997.
11. Kapur, J. N. Measures of information and their applications; John Wiley & Sons: New Delhi, India, 1994; ISBN 0-470-22064-3.
12. Reunanen, J. Overfitting in Making Comparisons Between Variable Selection Methods. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1371-1382.
13. Bengio, Y.; Chapados, N.; Extensions to Metric-Based Model Selection. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1209-1227.
14. Stahura, F. L.; Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. Differential Shannon Entropy Analysis Identifies Molecular Property Descriptors that Predict Aqueous Solubility of Synthetic Compounds with High Accuracy in Binary QSAR Calculations. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 550-558.
15. Stahura, F. L.; Godden, J. W.; Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Distinguishing between Natural Products and Synthetic Molecules by Descriptor Shannon Entropy Analysis and Binary QSAR Calculations. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1245-1252.
16. Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. Differential Shannon Entropy as a Sensitive Measure of Differences in Database Variability of Molecular Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1060-1066.
17. Agrafiotis, D. K. On the Use of Information Theory for Assessing Molecular Diversity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 576-580.
18. Kay, J. J. Self-Organization In Living Systems, Dissertation, University of Waterloo: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1984.
19. Eckschlager, K.; Danzer, K. Information theory in analytical chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, U.S.A., 1994; ISBN 0-471-59507-1.
20. Eckschlager, K. Stepanek, V. Information theory as applied to chemical analysis; Wiley-Interscience: New York, U.S.A., 1979; ISBN 0-471-04945-X.
21. Burger, K. Neue Möglichkeiten der Kristallstrukturbestimmung aus Pulverdaten durch die Nutzung resonanter Streuung von Röntgenstrahlung und der 'Maximum Entropy' Methode, Dissertation, Universität Tübingen, Germany, 1997; Shaker Verlag: ISBN 3-8265-3018-7.
22. Cover, T. M.; Thomas, J. A. Elements of Information Theory; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991; ISBN 0-471-06259-6.
23. Lin, J. Divergence Measures on the Shannon Entropy. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1991, 37, 145-151.
24. Dhillon, I. S.; Mallela, S.; Kumar, R. A Divisive Information-Theoretic Feature Clustering Algorithm for Text Classification (Kernel Machines Section). J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1265-1287.
25. Globerson, A.; Tishby, N. Sufficient Dimensionality Reduction (Kernel Machines Section), J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1307-1331.
26. Torkkola, K. Feature Extraction by Non-Parametric Mutual Information Maximization (Kernel Machines Section). J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1415-1438.
27. Witten, I. H.; Eibe, F. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations; Morgan Kaufmann: 1999; ISBN 1-55860-552-5.
28. Principe, J. C.; Xu, D.; Fisher, J. W. Information-Theoretic Learning. In Unsupervised Adaptive Filtering; Wiley-Interscience, 1999; Chapter 7, pp 265-319, ISBN 0-471-37941-7.
29. Zyczkowski, K. Rényi Extrapolation of Shannon Entropy. Open Sys., Inf. Dyn. 2003, 10, 297-310.
30. Bronstein, I. N.; Semendjajew, K. A. Taschenbuch der Mathematik, Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany, 1991.
31. Hemmateenejad, B.; Akhond, M.; Miri, R.; Shamsipur, M. Genetic Algorithm Applied to the Selection of Factors in Principal Component-Artificial Neural Networks: Application to QSAR Study of Calcium Channel Antagonist Activity of 1,4-Dihydropyridines (Nifedipine Analogous). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1328-1334.
32. Baumann, K.; Albert, H.; Korff, M. A systematic evaluation of the benefits and hazards of variable selection in latent variable regression, part I. search algorithm, theory and simulations. J. Chemom. 2002, 16, 339-350.
33. Baumann, K.; Korff, M.; Albert, H. A systematic evaluation of the benefits and hazards of variable selection in latent variable regression, part ii. practical applications. J. Chemom. 2002, 16, 351-360.
34. Malinowski, E. R. Factor Analysis in Chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002; ISBN 0-471-13479-1.
35. Nilson, J. Multiway Calibration in 3D QSAR, Dissertation, University Groningen, Groningen, Sweden, 1999.
36. Carreira-Perpiñán, M. A. Continuous latent variable models for dimensionality reduction and sequential data reconstruction, Dissertation, University of Sheffield, UK, 2001.
37. Varmuza, K. Multivariate Data Analysis in Chemistry. In Handbook of Chemoinfomatics; Gasteiger, J., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; Vol. 3, pp 1098-1134, ISBN 3-527-30680-3.
38. Xue, L.; Godden, J.; Gao, H.; Bajorath, J. Identification of a Preferred Set of Molecular Descriptors for Compound Classification Based on Principal Component Analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 669-704.
39. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular Descriptors for Effective Classification of Biologically Active Compounds Based on Principal Component Analysis Identified by a Genetic Algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 801-809.
40. Gohlke, H.; Dullweber, F.; Kamm, W.; März, J.; Kissel, T.; Klebe, G. Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption using a combined 'Simulated Annealing/Baek-propagation Neural Network' Approach. Rational Approaches Drug Des. 2001, 261-270.
41. Luçić, B.; Trinajstic, N. Multivariate Regression Outperforms Several Robust Architectures of Neural Networks in QSAR Modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 121-132.
42. Hwang, W. S.; Weng, J. Hierachical Discriminant Regression. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence 2000, 22, 1-6.
43. Hyvärinen, A.; Oja, E. Independent Component Analysis: A Tutorial. Neural Networks 2000, 13, 411-430.
44. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Rassokhin, D. N.; Lobanov, V. S. Multidimensional scaling and visualization of large molecular similarity tables. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 488-500.
45. Rassokhin, D. N.; Lobanov, V. S.; Agrafiotis, D. K. Nonlinear mapping of massive data sets by fuzzy clustering and neural networks. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 373-386.
46. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S. Nonlinear Mapping Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1356-1362.
47. Cho, S. J.; Cummins, D.; Bentley, J.; Andrews, C. W.; Tropsha, A. An Alternative to 3D QSAR: Application of Genetic Algorithms and Partial Least Squares to Variable Selection of Topological Indices. Submitted for publication in J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des.
48. Dunn, W. J.; Wold, S.; Edlund, U.; Hellberg, S.; Gasteiger, J. Multivariate Structure-Activity Relationships Between Data from a Battery of Biological Tests and an Ensemble of Structure Descriptors: The PLS Method. Quant Struct.-Act. Relat. 1984, 3, 131-137.
49. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
50. Bergström, C. A. S.; Strafford, M.; Lazorova, L.; Avdeef, A.; Luthman, K.; Artursson, P Absorption Classification of Oral Drugs Based on Molecular Surface Properties. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 558-570.
51. Shen, M.; LeTiran, A.; Xiao, Y.; Golbraikh, A.; Kohn, H.; Tropsha, A. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of Functionalized Amino Acid Anticonvulsant Agents Using k-Nearest-Neighbor and Simulated Annealing PLS Methods. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2811-2823.
52. Stanton, D. T. On the Physical Interpretation of QSAR Models. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1423-1433.
53. Eriksson, L.; Antti, H.; Holmes, E.; Johansson, E.; Lundstedt, T.; Shockcor, J.; Wold, S. Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Cheminformatics. In Handbook of Chemoinformatics; Gasteiger, J., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; Vol. 3, pp 1134-1166, ISBN 3-527-30680-3.
54. Schöllkopf, B. Support Vector Learning, Dissertation, University of Berlin, Oldenbourg Verlag: Germany, 1997.
55. Schölkopf, B.; Smola, A. J. Learning with Kernels - Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2002; ISBN 0-262-19475-9.
56. Guyon, I.; Elisseeff, A. An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection (Kernel Machines Section). J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1157-1182.
57. Stoppiglia, H.; Dreyfus, G.; Dubois, R.; Oussar, Y. Ranking a Random Feature for Variable and Feature Selection. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1399-1414.
58. Hall, M. Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning, Dissertation, University of Waikato, Australia, 1999.
59. Belanche, L.; Molina, L. C.; Nebot, A. Feature Selection Algorithms: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation. In 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'02', Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Maebashi City, Japan, 2002, 306.
60. Yasri, A.; Hartsough, D. Toward an Optimal Procedure for Variable Selection and QSAR Model Building. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1218-1227.
61. Hoffman, B. T.; Kopajtic, T.; Katz, J. L.; Newman, A. H. 2D QSAR Modeling and Preliminary Database Searching for Dopamine Transporter Inhibitors Using Genetic Algorithm Variable Selection of Molconn Z Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4151-4159.
62. Ozdemir, M. Evolutionary computing for feature selection and predictive data mining, Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York, U.S.A., 2002.
63. Western, J.; Elisseeff, A.; Schölkopf, B.; Tipping, M. Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models an Weston, J.; Elisseeff, A.; Schölkopf, B.; Tipping, M. Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods'. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1439-1461.
64. Bi, J.; Bennett, K.; Embrechts, M.; Breneman, C.; Song, M. Dimensionality Reduction via Sparse Support Vector Machines (Kernel Machines Section). J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1229-1243.
65. Rakotomamonjy, A. Variable Selection Using SVM-based Criteria. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1357-1370.
66. Godden, J. W.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Recursive Median Partitioning for Virtual Screening of Large Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 182-188.
67. Rusinko, A.; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
68. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Xu, H. A Geodesic Framework for Analyzing Molecular Similarities. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 475-484.
69. Rivals, I.; Personnaz, L. MLPs (Monolayer Polynomials and Multi-Layer Perceptrons) for Nonlinear Modeling Isabelle. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1383-1398.
70. Perkins, S.; Lacker, K.; Theiler, J. Graftin: Fast, Incremental Feature Selection by Gradient Descent in Function Space. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1333-1356.
71. Caruana, R.; Sa, V. R. Benefitting from the Variables that Variable Selection Discards. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1245-1264.
72. Bekkerman, R.; El-Yaniv, R.; Tishby, N.; Winter Y. Distributional Word Clusters vs Words for Text Categorization (Kernel Machines Section). J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1183-1208.
73. Forman, G. An Extensive Empirical Study of Feature Selection Metrics for Text Classification. J. Machine Learning Res. (special issue on Variable and Feature Selection) 2003, 3, 1289-1305.
74. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Myslik, J. C.; Salemme, F. R. Advances in diversity profiling and combinatorial series design. Molecular Diversity 1999, 4, 1-22.
75. Willet, P. Subset-Selection Methods For Chemical Databases. In Molecular Diversity in Drug Design; Dean, M., Lewis, R. A., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999; ISBN 0-7923-5980-1.
76. Kira, K.; Rendell, L. A practical approach to feature selection. In Proceeedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Machine Learning (ML92); Sleeman, D., Edwards, P., Eds.; Morgan Kaufman: San Mateo, CA, 1992; pp 249-256.
77. Kononenko, I. Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning; Bergadano, F., Raedt, L. D., Eds.; 1994.
78. Holte, R. C. Very Simple Classification Rules Perform Well on Most Commonly Used Datasets. Machine Learning 1993, 3, 63-91.
79. Holmes, G.; Nevill-Manning, C. G. Feature Selection via the Discovery of Simple Classification Rules. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (IDA-95); Baden-Baden, Germany, 1995.
80. Liu, H.; Li, J.; Wong, L. A Comparative Study on Feature Selection and Classification Methods Using Gene Expression Profiles and Proteomic Patterns. Genome Informatics 2002, 13, 51-60.
81. Altman, D. G. Practical statistics for medical research; Chapmann & Hall/CRC: New York, U.S.A., 1991; ISBN 0-412-27630-5.
82. Wu, S.; Flach, P. A. Feature selection with labeled and unlabeled data. In Bohanec, M., Kasek, B., Lavrac, N., Mladenic, D., Eds.; ECMU/ PKDD'02 workshop on Integration and Collaboration Aspects of Data Mining, Decision Support and Meta-Learning; University of Helsinki: 2002; pp 156-167.
83. Kohavi, R.; John, G. Wrappers for feature selection. Artificial Intelligence 1997, 97, 273-324.
84. Guyon, I.; Weston, J.; Barnhill, S.; Vapnik, V. Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines. Machine Learning 2002, 46, 389-422.
85. Czerminnski, R.; Yasri, A.; Hartsough, D. Use of Support Vector Machine in Pattern Classification: Application to QSAR Studies. Quant. Struct-Act. Relat. 2001, 20, 227-240.
86. Cristianini, N.; Taylor, J. S. An Introduction to Support Vector Maschines - and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; ISBN 0-521-78019-5.
87. Tong, W.; Hong, H.; Fang, H.; Xie, Q.; Perkins, R. Decision forest: Combining the predictions of multiple independent decision tree models. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 525-531.
88. Poland, J.; Zell, A. Different Criteria for Active Learning in Neural Networks: A Comparative Study. In Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2002); Verleysen, M., Evere/Belgium, 2002; pp 119-124.
89. Manallack, D. T.; Tehan, B. O.; Gancia, E.; Hudson, B. D.; Ford, M. G.; Livingstone, D. J.; Whitley, D. C.; Pitt, W. R. A Consensus Neural Network-Based Technique for Discriminating Soluble and Poorly Soluble Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 674-679.
90. Maclin, R.; Shavlik, J. W. Combining the predictions of multiple classifiers: Using competitive learning to initialize neural networks. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Montreal, Canada, 1995; pp 524-530.
91. Alpayd, E. Techniques for combining multiple learners. In Proceedings of Engineering of Intelligent Systems EIS'98; Teneriffe, Spain, 1998; pp 6-12.
92. Breimann, L. Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning 1996, 24, 123-140.
93. Freund, Y.; Schapire, R. A short introduction to boosting. J. Jpn. Soc. Artif. Intel. 1999, 14, 771-780.
94. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Ceden, W.; Lobanov, V. S. On the use of neural network ensembles in QSAR and QSPR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 903-911.
95. Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y.; Bartlett, P. L.; Lee, W. S. Boosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. Annals Statistics 1998, 26, 1651-1686.
96. Rusinko, A.; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
97. Cho, S. J.; Shen, C. F.; Hermsmeier, M. A. Binary Formal Inference-Based Recursive Modeling Using Multiple Atom and Physicochemical Property Class Pair and Torsion Descriptors as Decision Criteria. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 668-680.
98. Yuan, X.; Yuan, X.; Buckles, B. P.; Zhang, J. A Comparison Study of Decision Tree and SVM to Classify Gene Sequence, 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'03); March, Bangalore, India, 2003.
99. JOELib, http://joelib.sourceforge.net/.
100. Morgan, H. L. The Generation of a Unique Machine Description for Chemical Structures - A Technique Developed at Chemical Abstracts Service. J. Chem. Doc. 1965, 5, 107-113.
101. Figueras, J. Ring Perception Using Breadth-First Search. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 986-991.
102. Ivanciuc, O. Canonical Numbering and Constitutional Symmetry. In Handbook of Chemoinformatics; Gasteiger, J., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; Vol. 1, pp 139-160, ISBN 3-527-30680-3.
103. Weininger, D. SMILES: a Chemical Language for Information Systems. 1. Introduction to Methodology and Encoding Rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1988, 28, 31-36.
104. Weininger, D. SMILES 2: Algorithm for Generation of Unique SMILES Notation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 97-101.
105. Weininger, D. SMILES-A Language for Molecules and Reactions. In Handbook of Chemoinformatics; Gasteiger, J., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; Vol. 1, pp 80-102, ISBN 3-527-30680-3.
106. Ihlenfeldt, W. D.; Gasteiger, J. Hash Codes for the Identification and Classification of Molecular Structure Elements. J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 793-813.
107. Downs, G. M.; Gillet, V. J.; Holliday, J. D.; Lynch, M. F. Theoretical Aspects of Ring Perception and Development of the Extended Set of Smallest Rings Concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 187-206.
108. Downs, G. M. Ring Perception. In Handbook of Chemoinformatics; Gasteiger, J., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; Vol. 1, pp 161-177, ISBN 3-527-30680-3.
109. Wang, R.; Fu, Y.; Lai, L. A New Atom-Additive Method for Calculating Partition Coeffcients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 615-621.
110. Wang, R.; Gao, Y.; Lai, L. Calculating partition coeffcient by atom-additive method. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 2000, 19, 47-66.
111. Huuskonen, J. Estimation of Aqueous Solubility for a Diverse Set of Organic Compounds Based on Molecular Topology. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 773-777.
112. Huuskonen, J.; Salo, M.; Taskinen, J. Aqueous Solubility Prediction of Drugs Based on Molecular Topology and Neural Network Modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 450-456.
113. Tetko, I. V.; Tanchuk, V. Y.; Kasheva, T. N.; Villa, A. E. P. Estimation of Aqueous Solubility of Chemical Compounds Using E-State Indices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1488-1493.
114. Yan, A.; Gasteiger, J. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds Based on a 3D Structure Representation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 43, 429-434.
115. Liu, R.; So, S. S. Development of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Models for Early ADME Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 1. Aqueous Solubility. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1633-1639.
116. Livingstone, D. J.; Ford, M. G.; Huuskonen, J. J.; Salt, D. W. Simultaneous prediction of aqueous solubility and octanl/water partition coefficient based on descriptors derived from molecular structure. J. Comput.-Aided. Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 741-752.
117. Mazzatorta, P.; Benfenati, E.; Neagu, D.; Gini, G. The importance of scaling in data mining for toxicity prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1250-1255.
118. Tounge, B. A.; Pfahler, L. B.; Reynolds, C. H. Chemical Information Based Scaling of Molecular Descriptors: A Universal Chemical Scale for Library Design and Analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 879-884.
119. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C.; Tolan, J. W.; Muskai, S. M. Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption of Drug Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 726-735.
120. Gasteiger, J.; Sadowski, J.; Schuur, J.; Selzer, P.; Steinhauer, L.; Steinhauer, V. Chemical Information in 3D-Space. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1030-1037.
121. OpenBabel, http://openbabel.sourceforge.net/.
122. Clark, D. E. Evolutionary Algorithms in Molecular Design; Wiley-VCH: 2000; ISBN 3-527-30155-0.
123. Homeyer, A. Evolutionary Algorithms and their Applications in Chemistry. In Handbook of Chemoinformatics; Gasteiger, J., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; Vol. 3, pp 1239-1280, ISBN 3-527-30680-3.
124. Bron, C.; Kerbosch, J. Finding all cliques of an undirected graph, Comm. ACM. 1973, 16, 575-577.
125. Bomze, I.; Budinich, M.; Pardalos, P.; Pelillo, M. The maximum clique problem. In Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization; Du, D.-Z., Pardalos, P. M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, 1999; Vol. 4.
126. Gardiner, E. J.; Holliday, J. D.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Artymiuk, P. J. Selection of reagents for combinatorial synthesis using clique detection. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1998, 17, 232-236.