A new atom-additive method for calculating partition coefficients

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 615-621

  Wang, Renxiao ^a   Fu, Ying ^a   Lai, Luhua ^a  

^a Institute of Physical Chemistry   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000262640     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci960169p     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mansch, C.; Fujita, T. p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1616-1626.
2. Le, A. The Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient of Atomatic Solutes: the Effect of Electronic Interactions, Alkyl Chains, Hydrogen Bonds, and ortho-Substitution. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. II 1983, 2, 825-838.
3. Hansch, C.; Bjorkroth, J. P.; Leo, A. Hydrophobicity and Central Nervous System Agents: the Principle of Minimal Hydrophobicity in Drug Design. J. Pharm. Sci. 1987, 76, 663-687.
4. Hansch, C.; Muir, R. M. Correlation of Biological Activity of Phenoxyacetic Acids with Hamment Substituent Constants and Partition Coefficients. Nature 1962, 194, 178-180.
5. oct from Structures. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1281-1306.
6. Leo, A.; Hansch, C.; Elkins, D. Partition Coefficients and their Uses. Chem. Rev. 1971, 71, 525-616.
7. Hansch, C.; Leo, A. Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology; Wiley: New York, 1979.
8. Chou, J. T.; Jurs, P. C. Computer-assisted computation of partition coefficient from molecular structures using fragment constants. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1979, 19, 172-178.
9. Leo, A. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry; Mansch, C., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1990; Vol. 4, pp 295-319.
10. Rekker, R. F. The Hydrophobic Fragment Constant; Elsevier: New York, 1977.
11. Suzuki, T.; Kudo, Y. Automatic logP estimation based on combined additive modeling methods. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1990, 4, 155-198.
12. Moriguchi, I.; Hirono, S.; Liu, Q.; Nakagome, I.; Matsushita, Y. Simple Method of Calculating Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 127-130.
13. Klopman, G.; Wang, S. A Computer Automated Structure Evaluation (CASE) Approach to Calculation of Partition Coefficient. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 1025-1032.
14. Klopman, G.; Li, J.-Y.; Wang, S.; Dimayuga, M. Computer Automated IogP Calculations Based on an Extended Group Contribution Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 752-781.
15. Broto, P.; Moreau, G.; Vandycke, C. Molecular structures: perception, autocorrelation descriptor and SAR studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 19, 71-78.
16. Ghose, A. K.; Crippen, G. M. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three-Dimensional Structure-Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. I. Partition Coefficients as a Measure of Hydrophobicity. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577.
17. Ghose, A. K.; Pritchett, A.; Crippen, G. M. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three-Dimensional Structure-Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. III. Modeling Hydrophobic Interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 1988, 9, 80-90.
18. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Ghose, A. K.; Revankar, G. R.; Robins, R. K. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three-Dimensional Structure-Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. 4. Additional Parameters for Hydrophobic and Dispersive Interactions and Their Application. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 163-172.
19. Kamlet, M.; Doherty, R.; Abboud, J.-L.; Abraham, M.; Taft, R. Linear Solvation Energy Relationships: 36. Molecular Properties Governing Solubilities of Organic Nonelectrolytes In Water. J. Pharm. Sci. 1986, 75, 338-349.
20. Kamlet, M.; Doherty, R.; Abraham, M.; Marcus, Y.; Taft, R. Linear Solvation Energy Relationships. 46. An Improved Equation for Correlation and Prediction of Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients of Organic Nonelectrolytes (Including Strong Hydrogen Bond Donor Solutes) J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 5244-5255.
21. Leahy, D.; Morris, J.; Taylor, P.; Wait, A. Model Solvent Systems for QSAR. Part 3. An LSER Analysis of the 'Critical Quartet' New Light on Hydrogen Bond Strength and Directionality. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. II 1992, 2, 705-722.
22. Klopman, G.; Iroff, L. D. Calculation of Partition Coefficients by the Charge Density Method. J. Comput. Chem. 1981, 2, 157-160.
23. Klopman, G.; Namboordiri, K.; Schochet, M. Simple Method of Computing the Partition Coefficient. J. Comput. Chem. 1985, 6, 28-38.
24. Bodor, N.; Gabanyi, Z.; Wong, C. K. A New Method for the Estimation of Partition Coefficient. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3783-3786.
25. Bodor, N.; Huang, M. J. An extended version of a novel method for the estimation of partition coefficients. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992, 81, 272-281.
26. Hopfinger, A. J.; Battershell, R. D. Application of SCAR to drug design 1. Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients using solvent-dependent conformational analyses. J. Med. Chem. 1976, 19, 569-573.
27. Essex, J. W.; Reynolds, C. A.; Richards, W. G. Theoretical Determination of Partition Coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3634-3639.
28. Dunn, W. J., III; Nagy, P. I. Relative LogP and Solution Structure for Small Organic Solutes in the Chloroform/Water System Using Monte Carlo Methods. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 468-477.
29. Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Hoekman, D. Exploring QSAR: hydrophobic, electronic, and steric constants; American Chemistry Society: Washington, DC, 1995; Vol. 2.
30. SYBYL 6.2, Tripos Assoc. Inc., St. Louis, MO, 1995.
31. Furet, P.; Sele, A.; Cohen, N. C. 3D molecular lipophilicity potential profiles: a new tool in molecular modeling. J. Mol. Graph. 1988, 6, 182-189.
32. Abraham, D. J.; Kellogg, G. E. The effect of physical organic properties on hydrophobic fields. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 41-49.
33. Gaillard, P.; Carrupt, P.-A.; Testa, B.; Boudon, A. Molecular lipophilicity potential, a tool in 3D QSAR: Method and applications. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 83-96.
34. Moriguchi, I.; Hirono, S.; Nakagome, I.; Hirano, H. Comparison of Reliability of logP Values for Drugs Calculated by Several Methods. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 976-978.
35. Leo, A. Critique of Recent Comparison of logP Calculation Methods. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43, 512-513.