Binary Formal Inference-Based Recursive Modeling Using Multiple Atom and Physicochemical Property Class Pair and Torsion Descriptors as Decision Criteria

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 668-680

  Cho, Sung Jin ^a   Frank Shen, C ^a   Hermsmeier, Mark A ^a  

^a BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001475541     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci9908190     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Gallop, M. A.; Barret, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Gordon, E. M. Applications of Combinatorial Technologies to Drug Discovery. 1. Background and Peptide Combinatorial Libraries. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1233-1251.
2. Gordon, E. M.; Barret, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Gallop, M. A. Applications of Combinatorial Technologies to Drug Discovery. 2. Combinatorial Organic Synthesis, Library Screening Strategies, and Future Directions. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1385-1401.
3. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
4. Agrafiotis, D. K. Molecular Diversity. In Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry; Schleyer, P. V. R., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.
5. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of Structure-Activity Data to Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
6. Kubinyi, H. QSAR: Hansch Analysis and Related Approaches. In Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry; Mannhold, R., Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., Timmerman, H., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, 1993; Vol. 1, pp 21-36.
7. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research; Academic Press: New York, 1976.
8. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Structure-Activity Analysis; John Wiley: London, 1986.
9. Feldman, A.; Hodes, L. An Efficient Design for Chemical Structure Searching. I. The Screens. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1975, 15, 147-152.
10. Hodes, L. Selection of Descriptors According to Discrimination and Redundancy. Application to Chemical Substructure Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1976, 16, 88-93.
11. James, C. A.; Weininger, D.; Delany, J. In Daylight Theory Manual, version 4.61; Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc.: Irvine, CA, 1997.
12. Carhart, R. E.; Smith, D. H.; Venkataraghavan, R. Atom Pairs as Molecular Features in Structure-Activity Studies: Definition and Applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
13. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Dixon, J. S.; Venkataraghavan, R. Topological Torsions: A New Molecular Descriptor for SAR Applications. Comparison with Other Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1987, 27, 82-85.
14. Nilikantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Venkataraghavan, R. New Method for Rapid Characterization of Molecular Shapes: Application in Drug Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 79-85.
15. Kearsley, S. K.; Sallamack, S.; Fluder, E. M.; Andose, J, D.; Mosley, R. T.; Sheridan, R. P. Chemical Similarity Using Physiochemical Property Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 118-127.
16. Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D.; Underwood, D. J.; Kearsley, S. K. Chemical Similarity Using Geometric Atom Pair Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 128-136.
17. Martin, E. J.; Blaney, J. M.; Siani, M. A.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Wong, A. K.; Moos, W. H. Measuring Diversity: Experimental Design of Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1431-1436.
18. Moreau, G.; Broto, P. Autocorrelation of Molecular Structures: Application to SAR Studies. Nouv. J. Chim. 1980, 4, 757-764.
19. Burden, F. R. Molecular Identification Number for Substructure Searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 225-227.
20. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. In 3D-QSAR and Drug Design: Recent Advances; Kubinyi, H., Martin, Y., Folkers, G., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997; pp 339-353.
21. Chem-X user guide; Chemical Design Ltd: Oxon, U.K., 1997.
22. Pickett, D.; Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M. Diversity Profiling and Design Using 3D Pharmacophores: Pharmacophore-Derived Queries (PDQ). J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1214-1223.
23. Mason, J. S.; Cheney, D. L.; Morize, I.; Menard, P. R.; Bauerschmidt, S. Similarity and Diversity Methods for Drug Design: Use of Ligand-Based Properties and of Properties such as Potential Pharmacophores Determined from Both Ligands and Protein Targets. 215th ACS National Meeting, Dallas, TX, 1998; COMP 070.
24. Rarey, M.; Dixon, J. S. Feature Trees: A New Molecular Similarity Measure based on Tree Matching. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 471-490.
25. Cramer, R. D., III; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
26. Ferguson, A. M.; Heritage, T. W.; Jonathon, P.; Pack, S. E.; Philips, L.; Rogan, J.; Snaith, P. J. EVA: A New Theoretically based Molecular Descriptor for Use in QSAR/QSPR Analysis. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 143-152.
27. Kauvar, L. M.; Higgins, D. L.; Villar, H. O.; Sportsman, J. R.; Engqvist-Goldstein, A.; Bukar, R.; Bauer, K. E.; Dilley, H.; Rocke, D. M. Predicting Ligand Binding to Proteins by Affinity Fingerprinting. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 107-118.
28. Draper, N. R.; Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis; Wiley: New York, 1966.
29. Wold, S.; Dunn, W. J., III. Multivariate QSARs: Conditions for their Applicability. J. Chem. Inf: Comput. Sci. 1983, 23, 6-13.
30. Collantes, E. R.; Dunn, W. J., III. Amino Acid Side Chain Descriptors for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of Peptide Analogues. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2705-2713.
31. Jansson, P. A. Neural Networks: An Overview. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 357A-362A.
32. Tetko, I. V.; Luik, A. I.; Poda, G. I. Application of Neural Networks in Structure-Activity Relationships of a Small Number of Molecules. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 811-814.
33. Ajay. A Unified Framework for Using Neural Networks To Build QSARs. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 3565-3571.
34. So, S. S.; Richards, W. G. Application of Neural Networks: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of the Derivatives of 2,4-Diamino-5-(substituted-benzyl)pyrimidines as DHFR Inhibitors. J. Med., Chem. 1992, 35, 3201-3207.
35. Gateiger, J.; Zuapn, J. Neural Networks in Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 503-527.
36. Hecht-Nielsen, R. Counterpropagation Networks. Appl. Opt. 1987, 26, 4979-4984.
37. Zupan, J.; Novic, M. Investigation of Infrared Spectra-Structure Correlation Using Kohonen and Counterpropagation Neural Network. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 454-466.
38. Fogel, D. B. Applying Evolutionary Programming to Selected Traveling Salesman Problems. Cybern. Syst. (U.S.A.) 1993, 24, 27-36.
39. Fogel, D. B.; Fogel, L. J.; Porto, V. W. Evolutionary Methods for Training Neural Networks. IEEE Conference on Neural Networks for Ocean Engineering (Cat. No. 91CH3064-3); 1991, pp 317-327.
40. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic Algorithm in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1989.
41. Holland, J. H. Genetic Algorithms. Sci. Am. 1992, 267, 66-72.
42. Forrest, S. Genetic Algorithms: Principles of Natural Selection Applied to Computation. Science 1993, 261, 872-878.
43. Bohachevsky. I. O.; Johnson, M. E.; Stein, M. L. Generalized Simulated Annealing for Function Optimization. Technometrics 1986, 28, 209-217.
44. Kalivas, J. H.; Sutter, J. M.; Roberts, N. Global Optimization by Simulated Annealing with Wavelength Selection for Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 2024-2030.
45. Kalivas, J. H.; Generalized Simulated Annealing for Calibration Sample Selection from an Existing Set and Orthoginization of Undesigned Experiments. J. Chemom. 1991, 5, 37-48.
46. Hopfinger, A. J. A QSAR Investigation of Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibition by Baker Triazines Based upon Molecular Shape Analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7196-7206.
47. Rogers, D. R.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of Genetic Function Approximation to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 854-866.
48. King, R. D.; Muggleton, S.; Lewis, R. A.; Steinberg, M. J. E. Drug Design by Machine Learning: The Use of Inductive Logic Programming to Model the Structure-Activity Relationships of Trimethoprim Analogues Binding to Dihydrofolate Reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89, 11322-11326.
49. King, R. D.; Muggleton, S. H.; Srinivasan, A.; Sternberg, M. J. E. Structure-Activity Relationships Derived by Machine Learning: The Use of Atoms and Their Bond Connectivities to Predict Mutagenicity by Inductive Logic Programming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 438-442.
50. Klopman, G. MULTICASE 1. A Hierarchical Computer Automated Structure Evaluation Program. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1992, 11, 176-184.
51. Hurst, T.; Heritage, T. HQSAR-A Highly Predictive QSAR Technique Based on Molecular Holograms. 213th ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1997; CINF 019.
52. Gao, H.; Williams, C.; Labute, P.; Bajorath, J. Binary Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Analysis of Estrogen Receptor Ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 164-168.
53. Hawkins, D. M.; Kass, G. V. Automatic Interaction Detection. In Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis; Hawkins, D. H., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1982; pp 269-302.
54. Rusinko, A.; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. SCAM: Statistical Classification of Activities of Molecules Using Recursive Partitioning. 213th ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1997; CINF 068.
55. Hawkins, D. M.; Young, S. S; Rusinko, A. Analysis of a Large Structure-Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1997, 16, 296-302.
56. Young, S.S.; Hawkins, D. M. Analysis of a 29 Full Factorial Chemical Library. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2784-2788.
57. Young, S. S.; Hawkins, D. M. Using Recursive Partitioning to Analyze a Large SAR Data Set. SAR QSAR Env. Res. 1998, 8, 183-193.
58. Chen, X.; Rusinko, A.; Young, S. S. Recursive Partitioning Analysis of a Large Structure-Activity Data Set Using Three-Dimensional Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1054-1062.
59. MACCS II: Molecular Design Limited: San Leandro, CA, 1997.
60. CONCORD. A Program for the Rapid Generation of High Quality Approximate 3-Dimensional Molecular Structures; The University of Texas: Austin, TX; Tripos Associates: St. Louis, MO.
61. Wang, R.; Fu, Y.; Lai, L. A New Atom-Additive Method for Calculating Partition Coefficients. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 615-621.
62. Force Field Manual; Tripos Associates: St. Louis, MO, 1997.
63. van Osdol, W. W.; Myers, T. G.; Paull, K. D.; Kohn, K. W.; Weinstein, J. N. Use of the Kohonen Self-organizing Map to Study the Mechanisms of Action of Chemotherapeutic Agents. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1994, 86, 1853-1859.