A consensus neural network-based technique for discriminating soluble and poorly soluble compounds

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 674-679

  Manallack, David T ^a,e   Tehan, Benjamin G ^b   Gancia, Emanuela ^a   Hudson, Brian D ^c   Ford, Martyn G ^c   Livingstone, David J ^c,d   Whitley, David C ^c   Pitt, Will R ^a  

^a UCB PHARMA   (Belgium)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^d ChemQuest   (United Kingdom)

^e De Novo Pharmaceuticals Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DRUG PRODUCTS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FILTRATION; NEURAL NETWORKS;

BIOPHARMACEUTICALS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES;

SOLUBILITY;

EID: 0344950280     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0202741     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. A report on the costs of developing new drugs from Tufts University, 192 South Street, Suite 550, Boston, MA, 02111 U.S.A. http://www.tufts.edu/med/csdd/Nov30CostStudyPressRelease.html.
2. Wolcke, J.; Ullmann, D. Miniaturized HTS Technologies - uHTS. Drug Discov. Today 2001, 6, 637-646.
3. Furka, A. A. Combinatorial Chemistry: 20 Years On ... Drug Discov. Today 2002, 7, 1-4.
4. Kassel, D. B. Combinatonial Chemistry and Mass Spectrometry in the 21st Century Drug Discovery Laboratory. Chem. Rev 2001, 101, 255-267.
5. Hann, M.; Hudson, B.; Lewell, X.; Lifely, R.; Miller, L.; Ramsden, N. Strategic Pooling of Compounds for High-Throughput Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 897-902.
6. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombarde, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
7. Walters, W. P.; Stahl, M. T.; Murcko, M. A. Virtual Screening - An Overview. Drug Discov. Today 1998, 3, 160-178.
8. Rishton, Q. M. Reactive Compounds and In Vitro False Positives in HTS. Drug Discov. Today 1997, 2, 382-384.
9. Clark, D. E. Prediction of Intestinal Absorption and Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration by Computational Methods. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2001, 4, 477-496.
10. Johnson, D. E.; Wolfgang, G. H. Predicting Human Safety: Screening and Computational Approaches. Drug Discov. Today 2000, 5, 445-454.
11. Stewart, B. H.; Wang, Y.; Surendran, N. Ex Vivo Approaches to Predicting Oral Pharmacokinetics in Humans In Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry, Doherty, A. M.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2002; Vol. 35, pp 299-307.
12. Jorgensen, W. L.; Duffy, E. M. Prediction of Drug Solubility From Structure, in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Clark, D. E.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2002; Vol. 54, pp 355-366.
13. Huibers, P. D. T.; Katritzky, A. R. Correlation of the Aqueous Solubility of Hydrocarbons and Halogenated Hydrocarbons with Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 283-292.
14. Abraham, M. H.; Le, J. The Correlation and Prediction of the Solubility of Compounds in Water Using an Amended Solvation Energy Relationship. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999, 88, 868-880.
15. McElroy, N. R.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Hetercatom-Containing Organic Compounds From Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1237-1247.
16. Makino, M. Predictions of Aqueous Solubility Coefficients of Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls by use of Computer-Calculated Molecular Properties. Environ. Int. 1998, 24, 653-663.
17. Meylan, W. M.; Howard, P. H. Estimating Log P With Atom/Fragments and Water Solubility With Log P. Persp. Drug Discov. Des. 2000, 19, 67-84.
18. Klopman, G.; Zhu, H. Estimation of the Aqueous Solubility of Organic Molecules by the Group Contribution Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 439-445.
19. Kuhne, R.; Ebert, R.-U.; Kleint, F.; Schmidt, G.; Schuurmann, G. Group Contribution Methods to Estimate Water Solubility of Organic Chemicals. Chemosphere 1995, 2061-2077.
20. Huuskonen, J.; Salo, M.; Taskinen, J. Aqueous Solubility Prediction of Drugs Based on Molecular Topology and Neural Network Modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 450-456.
21. Huuskonen, J. Estimation of Aqueous Solubility for a Diverse Set of Organic Compounds Based on Molecular Topology. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 773-777.
22. Liu, R.; So, S-.S. Development of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Models for Early ADME Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 1. Aqueous Solubility. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1633-1639.
23. Bruneau, P. Search for Predictive Generic Model of Aqueous Solubility Using Bayesian Neural Nets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1605-1616.
24. Jorgensen, W. L.; Duffy, E. M. Prediction of Drug Solubility From Monte Carlo Simulations. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1155-1158.
25. Ruelle, P.; Kesserling, U. W. Solubility Prediction of n-Fatty Alcohols and Sterols in Complexing and Non-Complexing Solvents According to the Mobile Order Theory. Can. J. Chem. 1998, 76, 553-565.
26. Suzuki, T. Development of an Automatic Estimation System for Both the Partition Coefficient and Aqueous Solubility. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1991, 5, 149-166.
27. Burden, F. R. Molecular Identification Number for Substructure Searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 225-227.
28. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Metric Validation and the Receptor-Relevant Subspace Concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
29. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Novel Software Tools for Chemical Diversity. Persp. Drug Discov. Des. 1998, 9, 339-353.
30. DiverseSolutions, v4.0.6; University of Texas, Austin, USA.; Sybyl and UNITY are distributed through Tripos, Inc.: 1669 S. Hanley Rd., Suite 303, St. Louis, MO 63144, U.S.A.
31. Pirard, B.; Pickett, S. D. Classification of Kinase Inhibitors Using BCUT Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1431-1440.
32. Gao, H. Application of BCUT Metrics and Genetic Algorithm in Binary QSAR Analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 402-407.
33. Mason, J. S.; Beno, B. R. Library Design Using BCUT Chemistry-Space Descriptors and Multiple Four-Point Pharmacophore Fingerprints: Simultaneous Optimization and Structure-Based Diversity. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2000, 18, 438-51, 538.
34. Schnur, D. Design and Diversity Analysis of Large Combinatorial Libraries Using Cell-Based Methods. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 36-45.
35. Manallack, D. T.; Pitt, W. R.; Gancia, E.; Montana, J. G.; Livingstone, D. J.; Ford, M. G.; Whitley, D. C. Selecting Screening Candidates for Kinase and G Protein-Coupled Receptor Targets Using Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1256-1262.
36. Schneider, G.; Neidhart, W.; Oilier, T.; Schmid, G. "Scaffold-Hopping" by Topological Pharmacophore Search: a Contribution to Virtual Screening. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2894-2896.
37. The Physical/Chemical Property Database (PHYSPROP) is available from the Syracuse Research Corporation, Environmental Science Center: North Syracuse, NY.
38. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. A Knowledge-Based Approach in Designing Combinatorial or Medicinal Chemistry Libraries for Drug Discovery. 1. A Qualitative and Quantitative Characterization of Known Drug Databases. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 55-68.
39. Whitley, D. C.; Ford, M. G.; Livingstone, D. J. Unsupervised Forward Selection: a Method for Eliminating Redundant Variables. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1160-1168.
40. Bishop, C. M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition; Oxford University Press: 1995.
41. MATLAB is available from The MathWorks. Inc., Natick, MA.
42. Nabney, I. T. NETLAB: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition; Springer, NY, 2002.
43. SYSTAT is available from SPSS Inc., 444 N. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611 U.S.A.
44. Daylight Corporate Office 27401 Los Altos - Suite 360 - Mission Viejo, CA 92691 U.S.A.
45. Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H. Y.; Smith, B. R.; Ward, K. W.; Kopple, K. D. Molecular Properties that Influence the Oral Bioavailability of Drug Candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615-2623.
46. Tetko, I. V.; Tanchuk, V. Y.; Kasheva, T. N.; Villa, A. E. Estimation of Aqueous Solubility of Chemical Compounds Using E-State Indices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1488-1493.
47. The MDDR database is available from MDL Information Systems Inc., San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.A.