Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1005-1013

  Zhou, Hongyi ^a   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Knowledge based potential; Protein structure prediction; Structure selections; Threading

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ENERGY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 2542631929     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round IV. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:2-7.
2. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
3. Bowie JW, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
4. Godzik A, Skolnick J. Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to supersecondary and tertiary structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:12098-12102.
5. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 1993;16:92-112.
6. Abagyan R, Frishman D, Argos P. Recognition of distantly related proteins through energy calculations. Proteins 1994;19:132-140.
7. Murzin AG, Bateman A. Distance homology recognition using structural classification of proteins. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:105-112.
8. Xu Y, Xu D. Protein threading using PROSPECT: Design and evaluation. Proteins 2000;40:343-354.
9. Jones DT. Progress in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:377-387.
10. Torda AE. Perspectives in protein-fold recognition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:200-205.
11. David R, Korenberg MJ, Hunter IW. 3D-1D threading methods for protein fold recognition. Pharmacogenomics 2000;1:445-455.
12. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Domingues FS, Prlic A, Malik R, Andreeva A, Wiederstein M. Assessment of the CASP4 fold recognition category. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:55-67.
13. Meller J, Elber R. Protein recognition by sequence-to-structure fitness: Bridging efficiency and capacity of threading models. Adv Chem Phys 2002;120:77-130.
14. Dayhoff MO, Barker WC, Hunt LT. Establishing homologies in protein sequences. Methods Enzymol 1983;91:524-545.
15. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. Improved tools for biological sequence analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:2444-2448.
16. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D. Basic local alignment tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
17. Vingron M, Waterman MS. Sequence alignment and penalty choice. Review of concepts, case studies and implications. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1-12.
18. Qian B, Goldstein RA. Optimization of a new score function for the generation of accurate alignments. Proteins 2002;48:605-610.
19. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998;14:846-856.
20. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitutes matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1992;89:10915-10919.
21. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
22. Bailey TL, Gribskov M. Score distributions for simultaneous matching to multiple motifs. J Comput Biol 1997;4:45-59.
23. Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 2000;9:232-241.
24. Koretke KK, Russell RB, Lupas AN. Fold recognition from sequence comparisons. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:68-75.
25. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002;315:1257-1275.
26. Eddy S.R. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998;14:755-763.
27. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitutes matrices. Adv Protein Chem 2000;54:73-96.
28. Koonin EV, Wolf YI, Aravind L. Protein fold recognition using sequence profiles and its application in structural genomics. Adv Protein Chem 2000;54:245-275.
29. Yi TM, Lander ES. Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinement (ITR). Protein Sci 1994;3:1315-1328.
30. Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rice DW, Le Grand SM, Eisenberg D. A study of combined structure/sequence profiles. Fold Des 1996;1:451-461.
31. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci 1996;5:947-955.
32. Rost B, Sander C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol 1997;270:471-480.
33. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Zhang B, Godzik A. Fold prediction by a hierarchy of sequence, threading, and modeling methods. Protein Sci 1998;7:1431-1440.
34. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJE. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J Mol Biol 2000;299:499-520.
35. Panchenko AR, Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition. J Mol Biol 2000;296:1319-1331.
36. Shan YB, Wang GL, Zhou HX. Fold recognition and accurate query-template alignment by a combination of PSI-BLAST and threading. Proteins 2001;42:23-37.
37. Al-Lazikani B, Sheinerman FB, Honig B. Combining multiple structure and sequence alignments to improve sequence detection and alignment: application to the SH2 domains of Janus kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:14796-14801.
38. Kim D, Xu D, Guo J, Ellrott K, Xu Y. PROSPECT II: Protein structure prediction program for the genome-scale. Prot Eng 2003;16:651-657.
39. Skolnick J, Kihara D. Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR-a new approach to threading. Proteins 2001;42:319-331.
40. Lathrop RH, Smith TF. Global optimum protein threading with gapped alignment and empirical pair score functions. J Mol Biol 1996;255:641-665.
41. Lathrop RH. The protein threading problem with sequence amino-acid interaction preferences is NP-complete. Protein Eng 1994;7:1059-1068.
42. De La Crux X, Thornton JM. Factors limiting the performance of prediction-based fold recognition methods. Protein Sci 1999;40:750-759.
43. Goldstein RA, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG. The statistical mechanical basis of sequence alignment algorithms for protein structure prediction. In: Elber R., editor. Recent developments in theoretical studies of proteins. Singapore: World Scientific 1996;359-388.
44. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
45. Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci 1992;1:409-417.
46. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Quantifying the effect of burial of amino acid residues on protein stability. Proteins 2004;54:315-322.
47. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002;11:2714-2726. Corrections. Protein Sci 2003;12:2121.
48. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002;11:2714-2726. Corrections. Protein Sci 2003;12:2121.
49. Zhou H, Zhou Y. The stability scale and atomic solvation parameters extracted from 1023 mutation experiments. Proteins 2002;49:483-492.
50. Melo F, Sanchez R, Šali A. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 2002;430:430-448.
51. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate x-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258:367-392.
52. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
53. Xia Y, Huang ES, Levitt M, Samudrala R. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J Mol Biol 2000;300:171-185.
54. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
55. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001;44:223-232.
56. Tobi D, Elber R. Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: results from linear optimization. Proteins 2000;41:40-46.
57. Fischer D. Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. In: Altman RB, Dunker AK, Hunter, Lauderdale K, Klein TE, editors. Pacific Symp. Biocomputing. New York: World Scientific; 2000. p 119-130.
58. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
59. Fischer D, Elofsson A, Rice D. W, Eisenberg D. Assessing the performance of inverted protein folding methods by means of an extensive benchmark. In: Proceeding of the First Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. 1996;300-318.
60. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. Maxsub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000;16:776-785.
61. Marti-Renom M, Stuart A, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Šali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:291-325.
62. Jones DT. GenTHREADER: an effcient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999;287:797-815.
63. Domingues FS, Lackner P, Andreeva A, Sippl MJ. Structure-based evaluation of sequence comparison and fold recognition alignment accuracy. J Mol Biol 2000;297:1003-1013.
64. Lindahl E, Elofsson A. Identification of related proteins on family, superfamily and fold level. J Mol Biol 2000;295:613-625.
65. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
66. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
67. Bujnicki JM, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. Livebench-1: Large-scale automated evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Protein Sci 2001;10:352-361.
68. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589-1591.
69. Xu J, Li M, Kim D, Xu Y. RAPTOR: optimal protein threading by linear programming. J Bioinformatics Computational Biol 2003;1:95-117.
70. Fischer D. 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor. Proteins 2003;51:434-441.