A study of combined structure/sequence profiles

Folding and Design

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 451-461

  Elofsson, Arne ^a,b   Fischer, Daniel ^a   Rice, Danny W ^a   Le Grand, Scott M ^a   Eisenberg, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Genetic algorithms; Inverse protein folding; Profile methods

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; GENOME; HUMANS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030322814     PISSN: 13590278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00061-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Dayhoff, M.O., Barker, W.C. & Hunt, L.T. (1983). Establishing homologies in protein sequences. Methods Enzymol. 91, 254.
2. Vingron, M. & Waterman, M.S. (1994). Sequence alignment and penalty choices. Review of concepts, case studies and implications. J. Mol. Biol. 235(1), 1-12.
3. Orcutt, B.C., George, D.G. & Dayhoff, M.O. (1983). Protein and nucleic acid sequence database systems. Annu. Rev. Biochem. Biophys. 12, 419-441.
4. Gribskov, M., McLachlan, A.D. & Eisenberg, D. (1987). Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84(13), 4355-4388.
5. Abagyan, R., Frishman, D. & Argos, P. (1994). Recognition of distantly related proteins through energy calculations. Proteins 19(2), 132-140.
6. Bowie, J.U., Lüthy, R. & Eisenberg, D. (1991). A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253, 164-170.
7. Bryant, S.H. & Lawrence, C.E. (1993). An empirical energy function for threading protein sequences through the folding motif. Proteins 16(1), 92-112.
8. Fetrow, J.S. & Bryant, S.H. (1993). New programs for protein tertiary structure prediction. Biotechnology 11 (4), 479-484.
9. Flöckner, H., Braxenthaler, M., Lackner, P., Jaritz, M., Ortner, M. & Sippl, M.J. (1995). Progress in fold recognition. Proteins 23(3), 376-386.
10. Godzik, A., Kolinski, A. & Skolnick, J. (1992). Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 227-238.
11. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R. & Thornton, J.M. (1992). A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358, 86-89.
12. Kocher, J.-P.A., Rooman, M.J. & Wodak, S.J. (1994). Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify sequence-structure matches. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 1598-1613.
13. Ouzounis, C., Sander, C., Scharf, M. & Schneider, R. (1993). Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. Aligning sequences to contact profiles from three-dimensional structures. J. Mol. Biol. 232(3), 805-825.
14. Rooman, M.J., Kocher, J.-P.A. & Wodak, S.J. (1992). Extracting information from the amino acid sequence: accurate predictions for protein regions with preferred conformation in the absence of tertiary interactions. Biochemistry 31, 10226-10238.
15. Zhang, K.Y.J. & Eisenberg, D. (1994). The three-dimensional profile method using residue preferences as a continuous function of residue environment. Protein Sci. 3, 687-695.
16. Matsuo, Y. & Nishikawa, K. (1994). Protein structural similarities predicted by a sequence-structure compatibility method. Protein Sci. 3, 2055-2063.
17. Wilmanns, M. & Eisenberg, D. (1993). Three-dimensional profiles from residue-pair preferences: identification of sequences with β/α-barrel fold. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 1379-1383.
18. Wilmanns, M. & Eisenberg, D. (1995). Inverse protein folding by the residue pair preference profile method: estimating the correctness of alignments of structurally compatible sequences. Protein Eng. 8, 627-639.
19. Yi, T.M. & Lander, E.S. (1994). Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinement (IRT). Protein Sci. 3(8), 1315-1328.
20. Fischer, D. & Eisenberg, D. (1996). Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5, 947-955.
21. Henikoff, S. & Henikoff, J. (1992). Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 89, 10915-10919.
22. Gonnet, G.H., Cohen, MA & Benner, S.A. (1994). Analysis of aminoacid substitution during divergent evolution: the 400 by 400 dipeptide substitution matrix. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 199(2), 489-496.
23. Genetics Computer Group. (1982). GCG: Version 8.0. Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
24. Hendlich, M., et al., & Sippl, M.J. (1990). Identification of native folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 216, 167-180.
25. Lathrop, R.H. (1994). The protein threading problem with sequence amino acid interaction preferences is NP-complete. Protein Eng. 7(9), 1059-1068.
26. Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S. & Fitch, W.M. (1981). Comparative biosequence metrics. J. Mol. Evol. 18(1), 38-46.
27. Fischer, D., Elofsson, A., Rice, D.W. & Eisenberg, D. (1996). Assessing the performance of fold recognition methods by means of a comprehensive benchmark. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing '96. (Hunter, L., Klein, T.E., eds), pp. 300-318, World Scientific Publishers, New Jersey.
28. Pearson, W.R. (1995). Comparison of methods for searching protein databases. Protein Sci. 4, 1145-1160.
29. Fischer, D., Tsai, C.J., Nussinov, R. & Wolfson, H. (1995). A 3D sequence-independent representation of the protein data bank. Protein Eng. 8(10), 981-997.
30. Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S. & Sadler, J.R. (1983). Statistical characterization of nucleic acid sequence functional domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 11(7), 2205-2220.
31. Waterman, M.S., Smith, T.F. & Katcher, H.L. (1984). Algorithms for restriction map comparisons. Nucleic Acids Res. 11 (12), 237-242.
32. Bowie, J.U. & Eisenberg, D. (1994). An evolutionary approach to folding α-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91(10), 4436-4440.
33. Elofsson, A., Le Grand, S.M. & Eisenberg, D. (1995). Local moves: an efficient algorithm for simulation of protein folding. Proteins 23, 73-82.
34. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. & Chothia, C. (1995). SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247(4), 536-540.
35. Hobohm, U. & Sander, C. (1994). Enlarged representative set of proteins. Protein Sci. 3, 522-524.
36. Lee, B. & Richards, F.M. (1971). The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55(3), 379-400.
37. Sippl, M.J. (1993). Boltzmann's principle, knowledge based mean fields and protein folding. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 7, 473-501.